Norway - EliteserienData current as of 06 September 2026

FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde: match statistics

FK Bodo - Glimt crest
FK Bodo - Glimt
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Molde crest
Molde

FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FK Bodo - Glimt played Molde in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

FK Bodo - Glimt: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Molde: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FK Bodo - Glimt scores 2.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Molde scores 2.17 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FK Bodo - Glimt 17%, Molde 67%. Over 2.5: FK Bodo - Glimt 67%, Molde 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

FK Bodo - Glimt has higher xG: 2.21 vs 1.54. FK Bodo - Glimt: 16.3 shots per match, Molde: 13.3.

Match halves

FK Bodo - Glimt: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.33. Molde: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

FK Bodo - Glimt: 16-30 (4 goals). Molde: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-0. Average goals 4.25, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FK Bodo - Glimt holds a clear advantage: at home they have won 100% of matches and score an average of 4.0 goals per game (14 goals this season, 13 in the last 5), with 10 shots on target and 25.5 shots overall, xG for 3.13 and 100% clean sheets, despite average xG against of 1.19. Molde have no away wins yet (Win% 0), score on average 1.0 goal and concede 2.5 goals per away match, with xG for 1.33 and xG against 1.5 and 0% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 13 goals and average 2.6 points per game (4 wins, 1 draw), while the visitors have 11 goals and 1.4 points per game (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses) with 8 goals conceded. Bodo additionally dominate in chance quality: possession 67% vs 62%, shot conversion 16% vs 9% and shots difference 25.5 vs 11.5 suggest more clear-cut opportunities for the hosts. Based on this I tip a home win, with estimated probabilities of 75% for Bodo, 15% for a draw and 10% for a Molde win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS indicators strongly favor Yes: Molde has a season BTTS rate of 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while FK Bodo - Glimt has 50% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, with the league average BTTS at 51%. Offensively Bodo looks stronger by the numbers: 2.75 goals per match and xG 1.64 versus Molde’s season 1.0 goals and xG 1.33; Bodo averages 14.25 shots (5.0 on target) with a 19% conversion rate versus Molde’s 11.5 shots (4.5 on target) and 9%. Molde, however, concedes a lot — 2.5 goals per match seasonally and 8 conceded in the last 5 (1.6 per match), but Molde also scored 11 goals in their last 5 (2.2 per match), showing the visitors can also find the net. Bodo has the better defense (0.75 goals conceded seasonally and 0.4 in the last 5), yet Molde’s lack of clean sheets seasonally (0% clean sheets) and high seasonal and last-5 BTTS results suggest both teams are highly likely to score. Based on this data I assign 78% to Yes (BTTS - Yes) and 22% to No (No Goal) — the strongest signals are Molde’s 100% season BTTS, Molde’s high goals conceded (2.5), and the visitors’ 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Bodo averages 2.75 goals per home match, while Molde averages 1.00 goal and concedes 2.5 goals away with Molde’s defense allowing 0.75 at home, indicating significant home scoring potential. In xG terms the baseline is 1.64 xG for Bodo vs 1.50 xG against Molde (approx. 1.57 for the home side), and for Molde the baseline is 1.33 xG vs 1.25 xG Bodo (approx. 1.29 for the away side). Form confirms this direction: in the last 5 matches Bodo has 2.61 xG and scored 13 goals (2.6 average), Molde has 1.52 xG and scored 11 goals, and Bodo’s shot conversion is 19% vs Molde’s 9%, so I increase the forecast for the hosts. Based on this I project 1.82 goals for Bodo and 1.22 for Molde (total 3.04), which implies a strong probability for Over 1.5 goals (90%), moderate for Over 2.5 (62%) and lower for Over 3.5 (42%). The best betting signal is Over 1.5 due to the combination of the 2.75 home goal average, Molde’s 2.5 away defensive weakness and Bodo’s current form (13 scored and 2 conceded in the last 5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FK Bodo-Glimt has a clear numerical advantage: they average 2.75 goals per match versus Molde’s 1.00, and at half-time the hosts average 1.25 scored and 0.25 conceded, while Molde average 0.50 scored and 2.00 conceded. This season the hosts led at the break in 2 of 4 matches (50%), and in Bodo’s last 5 matches they held a lead at the break in 60% of games, whereas Molde led at the break 0 times this season and only in 20% of their last 5 matches. The hosts win at home 75% of matches and average 2.25 points per game versus Molde’s 0.50; additionally xG is 1.64 for Bodo versus 1.33 for Molde and shot conversion is 19% vs 9%, indicating higher efficiency for the hosts. Bodo frequently score before and just before half-time (2 goals in 0–15 min and 2 goals in 31–45 min this season); moreover 75% of the hosts’ matches have seen at least one goal by half-time, while Molde have seen this in all of their matches (100%). Therefore the strongest scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break for Bodo and a Bodo win at Full-Time) — I assign it a 58% probability; the alternatives 1/X (12%) and X/1 (10%) are less likely, and situations where Molde lead at the break I estimate at roughly 8% in total.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
25Shots4
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
8Shots on target3
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
2.97xG0.46
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
11Corners1
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
117Dangerous attacks0
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
10Fouls12
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
0Cards3
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
2.33Goals scored / match2.17
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1Goals conceded / match1.33
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%Average possession61%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
6.33Shots on target / match4.83
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.33Shots per match13.33
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
6.33Shots on target4.83
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
14.3%Shot conversion16.3%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%Possession61%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
2.21xG for1.54
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1.36xG against1.33
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

Shooting quality

FK Bodo - Glimt: DominantMolde: Efficient finishing
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - FK Bodo - Glimt · 1.4 pts / match - Molde

FK Bodo - Glimt
LDWWW
Season result split
67% W17% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-1
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.22Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Molde
LLWDW
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

2.33 goals / match - FK Bodo - Glimt · 2.17 goals / match - Molde

FK Bodo - Glimt is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - FK Bodo - Glimt · 1.33 goals / match - Molde

FK Bodo - Glimt scoring profile: very strong

FK Bodo - Glimt scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Molde keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Molde scoring profile: mixed

Molde scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while FK Bodo - Glimt keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

14Goals scored (season)13
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
6Goals conceded (season)8
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
3.33Average goals in match3.5
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
11Goals scored (last 5)11
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%2 goals50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
50%3 goals33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%4 goals33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal83%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%2 goals17%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%3 goals17%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%4 goals17%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%Scored in both halves50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
20%BTTS - last 580%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - FK Bodo - Glimt · 1.33 pts / match - Molde

FK Bodo - Glimt - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
Molde - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.33
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1Goals scored (1st half)1
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.83
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
33%No goal before half-time33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

After half-time (2nd half)

2.5Points per match (2nd half)1.67
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
83%Clean sheet after half-time50%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde
17%No goal after half-time33%
FK Bodo - GlimtMolde

FK Bodo - Glimt - second-half results

83% W0% R17% P
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Molde - second-half results

50% W17% R33% P
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FK Bodo - Glimt - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Molde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FK Bodo - Glimt
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Molde
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
5
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FK Bodo - Glimt

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.85
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Molde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
190%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

FK Bodo - GlimtLigaMolde
Average goals in match 3.332.89 3.50
Both teams scored 17%52% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%52% 50%
Clean sheets 67%26% 17%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 83%
Goal after half-time 100%79% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MoldeYellow cardAlbert Posiadała
  2. MoldeYellow cardSondre Milian Granaas
  3. FK Bodo - GlimtSubstitutionOn: Sondre Brunstad FetOff: Hakon Evjen
  4. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Blerton IsufiOff: Sondre Milian Granaas
  5. FK Bodo - GlimtSubstitutionOn: Andreas Klausen HelmersenOff: Ole Didrik Blomberg
  6. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Oskar Spiten-NysæterOff: Eirik Hestad
  7. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Eirik HauganOff: Mats Møller Dæhli
  8. MoldeYellow cardEirik Hestad

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): FK Bodo - Glimt 1 - 3 - 0 Molde. Average goals 4.25, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Bodo - Glimt
4 : 1
Molde FK
Molde FK
2 : 2
FK Bodo - Glimt
Molde
3 : 3
FK Bodo - Glimt
FK Bodo - Glimt
1 : 1
Molde

FAQ

What was the result of FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde?

The Eliteserien match finished FK Bodo - Glimt 0:1 Molde. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FK Bodo - Glimt and Molde?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches FK Bodo - Glimt won 1, Molde won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde?

FK Bodo - Glimt score 2.33 goals per game on average and Molde 2.17. The Eliteserien average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 17% of FK Bodo - Glimt's matches and 67% of Molde's.

What form are FK Bodo - Glimt and Molde in?

Over the last 5 games FK Bodo - Glimt have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Molde 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde?

The statistical background for FK Bodo - Glimt vs Molde — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.