Fleetwood Town vs Barnet: match statistics
Fleetwood Town vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fleetwood Town played Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 2:5.
Current form
Fleetwood Town: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Barnet: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fleetwood Town scores 1.20 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Barnet scores 1.27 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fleetwood Town 63%, Barnet 51%. Over 2.5: Fleetwood Town 44%, Barnet 41%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Barnet has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.41. Fleetwood Town: 12.4 shots per match, Barnet: 13.8.
Match halves
Fleetwood Town: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.71. Barnet: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66.
Goals by minute
Fleetwood Town: 76-90+ (13 goals). Barnet: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet enters the match in superior offensive form and with better points return: in the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 8 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Fleetwood have scored only 2 goals and average 1.0 point per game. Defensively Barnet also performs better — they concede an average of 1.00 goal in away matches and keep a clean sheet in 40% of away games, whereas Fleetwood concede 1.35 goals at home and have only 15% clean sheets. The hosts, however, hold an advantage in finishing efficiency: Fleetwood have a 12% conversion rate versus 9% for Barnet and average 1.5 goals per home game compared to 1.15 away for the visitors, indicating Fleetwood are more efficient with fewer chances. xG slightly favors Barnet (1.54 vs 1.43) and the visitors attempt more shots (13.05 vs 12.1) and more shots on target (4.25 vs 4.15), which confirms Barnet are creating marginally better opportunities despite the lower conversion. Considering the superior form (1.6 vs 1.0), stronger defense (1.00 conceded vs 1.35) and 40% clean sheets, I give the edge to the visitors and back a Barnet victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators are mixed: Fleetwood has BTTS at 57% versus Barnet 45%, averaging roughly 51% in line with the league level of 51%. Seasonal xG are 1.71 for Fleetwood and 1.54 for Barnet with xG against of 1.09 and 1.21 respectively, which theoretically suggests both teams generate ~1.3–1.7 xG and have chances to score. However, in the last 5 matches Fleetwood have scored just 2 goals (0.4 per game) and had BTTS in 20% of fixtures, while Barnet have scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and had BTTS in 80% of matches, indicating a significant offensive imbalance. Additionally, Barnet have 40% season clean sheets and 30% goalless games, while Fleetwood only 33% clean sheets, so despite the seasonal xG I lean toward a No Goal scenario (assessment: BTTS 'No' 54% vs 'Yes' 46%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals by xG are 1.46 for Fleetwood and 1.32 for Barnet, totalling 2.78, which is clearly above the 1.5 line and slightly above 2.5. This season Fleetwood has gone over 1.5 in 76% of matches, Barnet in 70% – average 73% – therefore I assess Over 1.5 as very likely (90%). Additionally Fleetwood generates xG_for 1.71 versus Barnet’s xG_against 1.21 (hence ~1.46 expected home goals), and Barnet has xG_for 1.54 versus Fleetwood’s xG_against 1.09 (hence ~1.32 for the visitors), which shows both teams create chances. On-target shots 4.71/4.25 and conversion 10%/9% confirm the realism of these xG numbers; in the last 5 matches Barnet scored 8 goals and Fleetwood 2, which raises the chance of Over 2.5 to around 60%. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation); Over 3.5 is rated low (approx. 28%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time: draws occurred for Fleetwood in 38% of matches and for Barnet in 60%, averaging around a 49% chance of a draw after 45 minutes, and in the last 5 matches both teams had 80% draws at the break. After the break Barnet is stronger — seasonally the away side wins 40% of matches compared to 38% for hosts, and in the last 5 Barnet averaged 1.6 goals per game vs 0.4 for Fleetwood and posted higher points per game in second halves (1.6 vs 1.4). On paper Fleetwood have higher xG and more shots (xG 1.71 vs 1.54, on average 14.52 shots and 4.71 on target vs 13.05 and 4.25 for the visitors), but that advantage does not translate into form — in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 0.4 goals and 0.0 goals at half-time. Given the high share of half-time draws (about 49%) and Barnet’s superior second-half performance, I view a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and an away win after 90 minutes (X/2) as the strongest signal; I estimate roughly a 22% probability for this outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fleetwood Town | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Barnet is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Fleetwood Town · 1.6 pts / match - Barnet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Fleetwood Town · 1.27 goals / match - Barnet
Barnet is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Fleetwood Town · 1.1 goals / match - Barnet
Fleetwood Town scores in 78% of matches (32 of 41 matches), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 37% (15 of 41 matches).
Barnet scores in 78% of matches (32 of 41 matches), while Fleetwood Town keeps a clean sheet in 22% (9 of 41 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fleetwood Town
Over / Under - Barnet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Fleetwood Town · 1.37 pts / match - Barnet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fleetwood Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fleetwood Town
Barnet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Fleetwood Town | Liga | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 51% | • 51% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 66% | • 66% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 78% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fleetwood Town 1 - 0 - 0 Barnet. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fleetwood Town vs Barnet?
The EFL League Two match finished Fleetwood Town 2:5 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fleetwood Town vs Barnet?
Fleetwood Town score 1.20 goals per game on average and Barnet 1.27. The EFL League Two average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Fleetwood Town's matches and 51% of Barnet's.
What form are Fleetwood Town and Barnet in?
Over the last 5 games Fleetwood Town have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Barnet 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fleetwood Town vs Barnet?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


