Fleury 91 vs Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: match statistics
Fleury 91 vs Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fleury 91 played Le Puy F.43 Auvergne in National (France). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Fleury 91: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fleury 91 scores 1.45 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Le Puy F.43 Auvergne scores 1.45 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.39 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fleury 91 41%, Le Puy F.43 Auvergne 55%. Over 2.5: Fleury 91 48%, Le Puy F.43 Auvergne 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Fleury 91 has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.28. Fleury 91: 10.3 shots per match, Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: 10.6.
Match halves
Fleury 91: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.83. Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Fleury 91: 76-90+ (9 goals). Le Puy F.43 Auvergne: 16-30 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National: 2.39 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fleury 91 appears to be the favorite: both teams have 42 goals this season, but Fleury sits 3rd versus Le Puy in 7th. In the last 5 matches Fleury has 4 wins and 1 draw, scoring 12 and conceding 3 (avg 2.4 scored and 0.6 conceded per match; 2.6 points per match), while Le Puy has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, scoring 9 and conceding 6 (1.8/1.2; 1.6 points per match). At home Fleury averages 11.15 shots and 4.92 on target with 60% possession, whereas Le Puy away posts 9.21 shots and 3.79 on target with 49% possession, giving a clear edge in chance creation. In terms of chance quality Fleury has higher home xG (1.47 vs 1.18 xG for Le Puy away) and lower average xG against (1.28 vs 1.51), plus more clean sheets (50% vs 36%), although Le Puy is slightly more efficient on shots (16% conversion vs 14%). Therefore I tip a home win: probabilities estimated at ~62% for Fleury, 22% for a draw and 16% for a Le Puy win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis slightly favors BTTS 'Yes': Fleury has a season BTTS rate of 67% versus Le Puy's 43%, with the league average at 52%. In the last 5 matches Fleury has only a 40% BTTS rate and concedes on average 0.6 goals (3 goals in 5 matches), while Le Puy has a 60% BTTS rate and concedes on average 1.2 goals (6 goals in 5 matches). In terms of chance quality Fleury generates 1.38 xG with 4.07 on-target shots, and Le Puy 1.18 xG with 3.79 on-target shots; at the same time Le Puy allows opponents 1.51 xG, which indicates a risk of conceding. Additionally Le Puy keeps a clean sheet in 36% of matches and Fleury in 20%, so the risk of a No Goal outcome is not zero, yet both teams have scored 42 goals this season. Considering a combined expected xG around 2.56 (1.38+1.18), the season BTTS levels and current form of both sides, I estimate BTTS 'Yes' at 56% versus 44% for 'No' and recommend a bet on 'Yes' as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Fleury scores on average 1.4 goals (xG 1.38), Le Puy 1.5 goals (xG 1.18); defensively Fleury concedes 1.06 xG, Le Puy 1.51 xG, yielding projected 1.45 goals for the home side and 1.12 for the away side, total 2.57 goals. Season rates show Over 1.5 in 87% of home matches and 79% of away matches (avg 83%), Over 2.5 in 53%/43% (avg 48%) and Over 3.5 in 13%/14% (avg 13.5%). A Poisson model with lambda=2.57 gives ~72.7% chance for Over 1.5, ~47.4% for Over 2.5 and ~25.8% for Over 3.5; combining these estimates with season frequencies (weight 60/40) yields a final probability for Over 1.5 of about 79%. Over 2.5 hovers around the decision threshold (approx. 48% vs 52% Under), so it offers no clear edge, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~18% after accounting for the low season share of 13.5%). Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 bet as the strongest signal: high season frequency (87% at home), positive xG balance and a forecast of 1.45+1.12=2.57 goals provide a market edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Le Puy is particularly dangerous before the break: it led at the break in 50% of matches and averages 1.07 goals by half-time, whereas Fleury scores only 0.40 goals in the first half and led at the break in just 13% of games. Additionally, Le Puy keeps a clean sheet at half-time in 71% of matches and has a +11 half-time goal difference, which increases the likelihood it will be leading after 45 minutes. However, Fleury has a clear advantage in second halves: it averages 1.00 goals after the break, records an average of 1.47 goals in the second half and in 87% of its matches there is at least one goal after the break, and in this part of the season it earns 1.73 points per game. Considering that Le Puy often leads at the break (50%) and Fleury regularly stages turnarounds in the second half (last 5 matches: an average of 1.6 goals after the break and 100% wins in matches with post-break goals), the strongest signal is 2/1 — the visitors leading at half-time and the home side winning after 90 minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fleury 91 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fleury 91 is 63% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Fleury 91 · 1.6 pts / match - Le Puy F.43 Auvergne
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fleury 91 is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.9 goals / match - Fleury 91 · 1.03 goals / match - Le Puy F.43 Auvergne
Fleury 91 scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Le Puy F.43 Auvergne keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
Le Puy F.43 Auvergne scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while Fleury 91 keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fleury 91
Over / Under - Le Puy F.43 Auvergne
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fleury 91 is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Fleury 91 · 1.41 pts / match - Le Puy F.43 Auvergne
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fleury 91 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Le Puy F.43 Auvergne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fleury 91
Le Puy F.43 Auvergne
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National).
Teams vs league
| Fleury 91 | Liga | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.34 | 2.39 | • 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 52% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 47% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 30% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 69% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fleury 91 0 - 0 - 1 Le Puy F.43 Auvergne. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fleury 91 vs Le Puy F.43 Auvergne?
The National match finished Fleury 91 4:0 Le Puy F.43 Auvergne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fleury 91 vs Le Puy F.43 Auvergne?
Fleury 91 score 1.45 goals per game on average and Le Puy F.43 Auvergne 1.45. The National average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Fleury 91's matches and 55% of Le Puy F.43 Auvergne's.
What form are Fleury 91 and Le Puy F.43 Auvergne in?
Over the last 5 games Fleury 91 have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Le Puy F.43 Auvergne 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fleury 91 vs Le Puy F.43 Auvergne?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.