Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead: match statistics
Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Forest Green Rovers played Gateshead in National League (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: The New Lawn. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Forest Green Rovers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Gateshead: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Forest Green Rovers scores 1.17 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Gateshead scores 0.83 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Forest Green Rovers 50%, Gateshead 50%. Over 2.5: Forest Green Rovers 67%, Gateshead 50%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Forest Green Rovers has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.10. Forest Green Rovers: 13.7 shots per match, Gateshead: 6.8.
Match halves
Forest Green Rovers: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Gateshead: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Forest Green Rovers: 46-60 (4 goals). Gateshead: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Forest Green Rovers have a clear attacking edge at home, averaging 1.74 xG and 14.33 shots per match, while Gateshead manage just 0.88 xG and 4.67 shots away from home. The hosts score 1.33 goals per home game, compared with just 0.67 for the visitors, who average only 2.33 shots on target. However, Forest Green’s defence is prone to errors, conceding 2.33 goals per home match and yet to keep a clean sheet, which increases Gateshead’s chances of scoring. Despite this, Gateshead have lost all 3 of their away matches so far, with their opponents creating an average of 1.92 xG against them. Both teams have won 2 of their last 5 matches, but the hosts’ advantage in chance creation and the visitors’ extremely poor away run point to a 1 result.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is weakened primarily by the limited attacking output of both teams: Forest Green score an average of 1.00 goal at home, while Gateshead manage just 0.67 away from home. In their last five matches, each team averaged only 0.8 goals, and BTTS occurred in just 40% of matches for both sides during this period. Gateshead have yet to keep a clean sheet away from home and concede as many as 2.33 goals per match there, making a home goal highly probable; however, the visitors create few chances, averaging 4.67 shots and 2.33 shots on target per match. Forest Green have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their home matches, while Gateshead’s away xG is just 0.88, increasing the risk that the visitors will fail to score. Although the league-wide BTTS average stands at 65%, the current scoring form of both teams points more clearly towards a scenario in which at least one side fails to score — BTTS No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.32 xG at home, while Gateshead allows opponents as much as 1.92 xG away from home and concedes an average of 2.33 goals. Forest Green has generated 1.55 xG per match across its last five fixtures, while the visitors’ defense has allowed opponents 1.79 xG. Gateshead scores only 0.67 goals away from home, but Forest Green has conceded an average of 1.6 goals in its last five matches, giving the visitors a realistic chance to contribute to the scoreline. At least two goals have been scored in 67% of the hosts’ matches and in every Gateshead away fixture so far. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.75 goals and Gateshead’s particularly vulnerable defense clearly support surpassing this low line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Forest Green Rovers win, as the hosts have been level at the break in all three of their home matches so far, while Gateshead had a half-time draw in 80% of their last five games. A cautious opening is expected: Forest Green have yet to score before half-time in their home matches, while Gateshead have averaged 0.0 goals in the first half both across the season and in their last five appearances. After the break, the hosts should gain the upper hand, averaging 1.0 second-half goal at home, whereas Gateshead concede 1.67 goals per match in that period and have failed to keep a clean sheet in the second half of any away game. The hosts’ victory is also supported by their superior attacking xG, 1.32 compared with 0.88, as well as Gateshead’s significantly weaker record: they have lost every away match so far and concede an average of 2.33 goals on the road. A full-time draw remains a realistic alternative, but Forest Green average 9.0 shots per match compared with their opponents’ 4.67, strengthening the hosts’ chances of turning a balanced start in their favour.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Forest Green Rovers | Gateshead | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forest Green Rovers is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers · 0.8 pts / match - Gateshead
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers · 0.83 goals / match - Gateshead
Gateshead is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers · 1.5 goals / match - Gateshead
Forest Green Rovers scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Gateshead keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Gateshead scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
Over / Under - Gateshead
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forest Green Rovers is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers · 0.67 pts / match - Gateshead
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gateshead - second-half results
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Forest Green Rovers
Gateshead
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Forest Green Rovers | Liga | Gateshead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.83 | 3.07 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 17% | 17% | • 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Forest Green Rovers 2 - 0 - 0 Gateshead. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead?
The National League match finished Forest Green Rovers 4:0 Gateshead. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Forest Green Rovers and Gateshead?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Forest Green Rovers won 2, Gateshead won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead?
Forest Green Rovers score 1.17 goals per game on average and Gateshead 0.83. The National League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Forest Green Rovers's matches and 50% of Gateshead's.
What form are Forest Green Rovers and Gateshead in?
Over the last 5 games Forest Green Rovers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gateshead 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead?
The statistical background for Forest Green Rovers vs Gateshead — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


