England - National LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Forest Green Rovers vs Morecambe: match statistics

Forest Green Rovers vs Morecambe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Forest Green Rovers played Morecambe in National League (England). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Forest Green Rovers: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Morecambe: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Forest Green Rovers scores 1.71 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Morecambe scores 1.47 and concedes 2.18. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Forest Green Rovers 67%, Morecambe 58%. Over 2.5: Forest Green Rovers 51%, Morecambe 69%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Forest Green Rovers has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.39. Forest Green Rovers: 16.1 shots per match, Morecambe: 11.4.

Match halves

Forest Green Rovers: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. Morecambe: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Forest Green Rovers: 61-75 (16 goals). Morecambe: 46-60 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National League: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Forest Green Rovers have a potent attack and good form – 77 goals this season and 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per match), and at home they score 2.0 goals on average with an xG of 2.29. Morecambe have clear defensive issues: 98 goals conceded this season and 14 in the last 5 matches (2.8 per match), and away they concede 2.36 goals on average with xG against 1.93. The hosts create significantly more opportunities – 19.55 shots and 6.91 on target per home match versus 10.45 shots and 4.18 on target for the visitors, while also enjoying higher possession (57% vs 49%). Forest Green keep a clean sheet in 27% of home games and fail to score in only 5% of matches, whereas Morecambe have 14% clean sheets away and fail to score in 27% of away matches, exacerbating the visitors’ defensive problems. Considering the xG advantage (2.29 vs 1.35), lower average goals conceded by the hosts at home (1.00 vs 2.36) and better form (2.0 vs 0.8 points in the last 5), I assess probabilities as: Home 70%, Draw 18%, Morecambe win 12%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'BTTS - Yes' scenario is more likely: season BTTS rates are 57% for Forest Green and 59% for Morecambe versus a league average of 56%. In the last 5 matches Forest Green had BTTS in 80% of games, scoring an average of 2.6 goals per match, while Morecambe had BTTS in 60% and conceded an average of 2.8 goals. Season totals show Forest Green scored 77 and conceded 52 (avg 2.0 per match), and Morecambe scored 66 and conceded 98 (avg 2.36 per match), which materially increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Additionally, attacking xG is 1.43 for Forest Green vs 1.35 for Morecambe, xG against is 1.76 and 1.93, and shots on target per match are 3.91 vs 4.18. Low clean sheet expected rates (13% and 14%) and Morecambe’s higher shot conversion (16% vs 10%) further support BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect approximately 3.24 total goals (1.68 for Forest Green, 1.56 for Morecambe) — values derived from xG: Forest Green’s 1.43 attacking xG against Morecambe’s 1.93 defensive xG yields 1.68, and Morecambe’s 1.35 xG versus Forest Green’s 1.76 defensive xG yields 1.56. Seasonal metrics strongly support the over: Forest Green had Over 1.5 in 91% of matches, Morecambe in 86%, while Over 2.5 occurred in 70% and 68% of cases. In the last 5 matches Forest Green scored 13 goals (2.6 avg.), and Morecambe conceded 14 goals (2.8 avg.), increasing the likelihood of a high-scoring game; additionally both teams scored in 57% (Forest Green) and 59% (Morecambe) of matches. Given these figures and an expected 3.24 total goals, the safest signal is a bet on Over 1.5 (I assess 88% probability), although Over 2.5 also has strong support (~75%), and Over 3.5 remains moderately likely (~52%). Morecambe have conceded 98 goals this season (2.36 per game) and Forest Green average 12.39 shots with an xG of 1.43, further supporting a goal-rich match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1). Draws at half-time are common for both teams: Forest Green were level at the break in 35% of matches and Morecambe in 32%. In 78–82% of games at least one goal is scored before half-time, indicating an active but balanced HT. After the break the home side clearly dominates in the last five fixtures — they average 2.0 goals in second halves, win 80% of second halves and collect 2.6 points after the interval, whereas the visitors average 0.8 goals and 0.6 points in second halves. Additionally, the home xG is 1.43 versus 1.35 for the away side, and Morecambe concedes 1.93 xG on average compared with 1.76 for Forest Green, which supports the thesis that after an HT draw Forest Green are more likely to turn the result in their favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
21Shots5
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
12Shots on target3
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
2.57xG0.66
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
6Corners2
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
56Dangerous attacks17
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
8Fouls8
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
0Cards0
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.71Goals scored / match1.47
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.16Goals conceded / match2.18
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
54%Average possession49%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
5.87Shots on target / match4.04
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.11Shots per match11.44
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
5.87Shots on target4.04
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
10.6%Shot conversion12.8%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
54%Possession49%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.95xG for1.39
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.2xG against1.84
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Shooting quality

Forest Green Rovers: AttackingMorecambe: Balanced
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Forest Green Rovers is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers · 0.8 pts / match - Morecambe

Forest Green Rovers
WWDWL
Season result split
49% W27% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-12-11
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-5-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Morecambe
LWDLL
Season result split
20% W24% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-25
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-12
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Forest Green Rovers is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.71 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers · 1.47 goals / match - Morecambe

Forest Green Rovers is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers · 2.18 goals / match - Morecambe

Forest Green Rovers scoring profile: very strong

Forest Green Rovers scores in 87% of matches (39 of 45 matches), while Morecambe keeps a clean sheet in 13% (6 of 45 matches).

Morecambe scoring profile: very strong

Morecambe scores in 69% of matches (31 of 45 matches), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 24% (11 of 45 matches).

77Goals scored (season)66
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
52Goals conceded (season)98
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
2.87Average goals in match3.64
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
13Goals scored (last 5)7
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
6Goals conceded (last 5)14
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal69%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
53%2 goals42%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
20%3 goals18%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
11%4 goals16%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal87%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
29%2 goals67%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
9%3 goals38%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
2%4 goals18%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Forest Green Rovers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.30 of 45 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
7%BTTS in both halves22%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
38%Scored in both halves42%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS49%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
80%BTTS - last 560%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forest Green Rovers is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers · 1.13 pts / match - Morecambe

Forest Green Rovers - half-time state
36% leading31% draw33% trailing
Morecambe - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.13
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.69
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.6
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
49%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
44%No goal before half-time51%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)0.96
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
1.44Average goals (2nd half)2.04
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
62%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe
31%No goal after half-time38%
Forest Green RoversMorecambe

Forest Green Rovers - second-half results

56% W22% R22% P
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
85
Second-half points
+25
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 49%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Morecambe - second-half results

22% W29% R49% P
51
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Forest Green Rovers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.62.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Morecambe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Forest Green Rovers
ScoredConceded
8
11
0-15
12
8
16-30
12
13
31-45
15
3
46-60
16
10
61-75
14
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Morecambe
ScoredConceded
5
12
0-15
13
8
16-30
13
21
31-45
16
15
46-60
8
16
61-75
11
26
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (26). Late-goal balance (76-90): -15 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Forest Green Rovers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Morecambe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).

Teams vs league

Forest Green RoversLigaMorecambe
Average goals in match 2.872.92 3.64
Both teams scored 67%56% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 51%57% 69%
Clean sheets 24%24% 13%
Goal before half-time 82%71% 80%
Goal after half-time 84%81% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Forest Green RoversGoalJili BuyabuAssist: Jayden Clarke
  2. Forest Green RoversGoalKyle McAllister
  3. Forest Green RoversGoalGabe KircoughAssist: Jayden Clarke
  4. Forest Green RoversSubstitutionOn: Christian DoidgeOff: D'Mani Lucell Bughail-Mellor
  5. MorecambeSubstitutionOn: Jake CainOff: Yann Songo'o
  6. MorecambeSubstitutionOn: Kyle JamesonOff: Paul Lewis
  7. Forest Green RoversGoalRicardo ReesAssist: Tre Pemberton
  8. MorecambeSubstitutionOn: Ma'kel Bogle-CampbellOff: Benjamin Lee Tollitt
  9. Forest Green RoversGoalRicardo Rees

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Forest Green Rovers 1 - 0 - 0 Morecambe. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Morecambe FC
1 : 3
Forest Green Rovers FC

FAQ

What was the result of Forest Green Rovers vs Morecambe?

The National League match finished Forest Green Rovers 5:0 Morecambe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Forest Green Rovers vs Morecambe?

Forest Green Rovers score 1.71 goals per game on average and Morecambe 1.47. The National League average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Forest Green Rovers's matches and 58% of Morecambe's.

What form are Forest Green Rovers and Morecambe in?

Over the last 5 games Forest Green Rovers have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Morecambe 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forest Green Rovers vs Morecambe?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.