Scotland - League TwoStation ParkData current as of 03 November 2026

Forfar Athletic vs Annan Athletic: match statistics

Forfar Athletic vs Annan Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Forfar Athletic played Annan Athletic in League Two (Scotland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Station Park. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Forfar Athletic: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Annan Athletic: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Forfar Athletic scores 1.00 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Annan Athletic scores 1.29 and concedes 1.29. League average: 3.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Forfar Athletic 43%, Annan Athletic 43%. Over 2.5: Forfar Athletic 57%, Annan Athletic 43%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Annan Athletic has higher xG: 1.07 vs 0.95. Forfar Athletic: 6.6 shots per match, Annan Athletic: 7.0.

Match halves

Forfar Athletic: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Annan Athletic: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Forfar Athletic: 61-75 (3 goals). Annan Athletic: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 3.51 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Annan Athletic head into this fixture in clearly superior recent form, having collected 10 points from their last five matches, including 3 wins, while Forfar Athletic have managed just 2 points and remain without a victory. The visitors have scored 11 goals during this period, compared with only 3 for the hosts, while Forfar have conceded as many as 13 goals across their five appearances. Forfar’s season-long home figures are nevertheless solid, with the team winning 67% of their home matches, averaging 1.33 goals scored and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of fixtures. Annan have a weaker away record, averaging 0.67 goals and losing 67% of their matches, but their recent attacking efficiency and defensive improvement—only 4 goals conceded in five matches—support a narrow away win. Annan’s advantage in current form and finishing quality should outweigh Forfar’s home advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes scenario does not have a clear edge, mainly due to Forfar Athletic’s significant offensive regression: over their last 5 matches, the team has scored just 0.6 goals per game from 0.70 xG. Annan Athletic have defended very solidly recently, conceding an average of 0.8 goals per match with 0.93 xG against, and have conceded only 4 goals in total across their last 5 fixtures. The visitors should nevertheless find the net, as they are currently scoring 2.2 goals per match, while Forfar are conceding 2.6 goals and have allowed 13 goals in their last 5 appearances. Seasonal BTTS figures stand at just 50% for Forfar and 33% for Annan, below the league average of 54%. Therefore, it is more likely that at least one team—most notably the hosts—will fail to score, making BTTS - No the more probable outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Annan are in clearly better form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.2 goals scored and just 0.8 conceded, while Forfar have scored 0.6 goals and allowed opponents 2.6. The hosts created just 0.70 xG per match during this period, whereas Annan allowed opponents 0.93 xG, which limits the forecast for Forfar’s goal tally. The visitors have a case for around 1.65 goals, but their season-long away average is only 0.67 goals, so a very high-scoring game is not the most likely scenario. Over 3.5 goals landed in only 25% of Forfar’s matches and in none of Annan’s, while both teams have seen at least three goals in 60% of their recent matches. Therefore, the safest pick is Under 3.5 goals, as Annan’s form supports goals, but the data does not confirm regular four-goal outcomes.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points toward Annan Athletic, who have averaged 2.2 goals scored and just 0.8 conceded over their last five matches, while Forfar have scored only 0.6 and allowed opponents 2.6. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 80% of their recent matches, failing to score in the first half of any of them, whereas the visitors were leading at the break in 40% of those games and averaged 0.8 first-half goals. Full-season first-half data also calls for caution regarding Annan’s attacking output, as they averaged no goals in that period, but Forfar’s poor current form clearly shifts the balance of power. After the break, Annan have averaged 1.4 goals across their last five appearances, while Forfar have conceded 1.2 in this period, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will maintain or extend their lead. Therefore, the most likely scenario is Annan leading at the break and going on to win at the final whistle: HT/FT 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14Shots12
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
4Shots on target4
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1.5xG1.39
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
3Corners5
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
47Dangerous attacks50
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
21Fouls7
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1Cards0
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1Goals scored / match1.29
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1.86Goals conceded / match1.29
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
50%Average possession51%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
3.57Shots on target / match3.57
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.57Shots per match7
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
3.57Shots on target3.57
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
15.2%Shot conversion18.4%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
50%Possession51%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0.95xG for1.07
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1.17xG against1.08
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Shooting quality

Forfar Athletic: Efficient finishingAnnan Athletic: Efficient finishing
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)54%51%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Annan Athletic is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Forfar Athletic · 1.2 pts / match - Annan Athletic

Forfar Athletic
WLDLL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Annan Athletic
LLWLW
Season result split
43% W0% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-4
1.29 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Annan Athletic is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Forfar Athletic · 1.29 goals / match - Annan Athletic

Annan Athletic is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - Forfar Athletic · 1.29 goals / match - Annan Athletic

Forfar Athletic scoring profile: strong

Forfar Athletic scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Annan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Annan Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Annan Athletic scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Forfar Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

7Goals scored (season)9
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
13Goals conceded (season)9
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
2.86Average goals in match2.57
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
12Goals conceded (last 5)5
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%2 goals43%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%3 goals0%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0%4 goals0%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal57%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%2 goals43%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%3 goals14%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%4 goals14%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%Scored in both halves29%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
40%BTTS - last 540%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Annan Athletic is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Forfar Athletic · 1.43 pts / match - Annan Athletic

Forfar Athletic - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Annan Athletic - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.43
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1.57Average goals (1st half)0.71
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
57%No goal before half-time57%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)1.43
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.86
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic
57%No goal after half-time29%
Forfar AthleticAnnan Athletic

Forfar Athletic - second-half results

14% W43% D43% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Annan Athletic - second-half results

43% W14% D43% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Forfar Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Annan Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Forfar Athletic
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
0
1
46-60
3
3
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Annan Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Forfar Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Annan Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Forfar AthleticLigaAnnan Athletic
Average goals in match▼ 2.863.51▼ 2.57
Both teams scored▼ 43%54%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 57%66%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 29%23%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%83%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%89%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.51
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+62%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defence advantage
+43%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Forfar AthleticGoalLuca PerrieAssist: Blair Alston
  2. Forfar AthleticYellow cardEthan Crombie
  3. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Rocco Hickey-FugacciaOff: Luca Perrie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Forfar Athletic 2 - 1 - 1 Annan Athletic. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Forfar Athletic vs Annan Athletic?

The League Two match finished Forfar Athletic 1:0 Annan Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Forfar Athletic and Annan Athletic?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Forfar Athletic won 2, Annan Athletic won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Forfar Athletic vs Annan Athletic?

Forfar Athletic score 1.00 goals per game on average and Annan Athletic 1.29. The League Two average is 3.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Forfar Athletic's matches and 43% of Annan Athletic's.

What form are Forfar Athletic and Annan Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Forfar Athletic have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Annan Athletic 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forfar Athletic vs Annan Athletic?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.