Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph: match statistics
Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fort Wayne played Greenville Triumph in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Fort Wayne: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Greenville Triumph: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fort Wayne scores 1.40 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Greenville Triumph scores 1.08 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fort Wayne 47%, Greenville Triumph 38%. Over 2.5: Fort Wayne 40%, Greenville Triumph 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.39. Fort Wayne: 13.1 shots per match, Greenville Triumph: 11.8.
Match halves
Fort Wayne: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.67. Greenville Triumph: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Fort Wayne: 0-15 (5 goals). Greenville Triumph: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fort Wayne has a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.67 goals scored and concede only 0.5 goals per game, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and remaining unbeaten at home (0% loss rate). Greenville performs poorly away — they average 0.67 goals scored and concede 1.67 per match, and fail to score in 67% of away games. The difference in chance quality is significant: Fort Wayne’s home xG is 1.77 versus the visitors’ 1.22 away xG, hosts average 5.83 shots on target per game compared to 2.83 for the opponents and have higher finishing efficiency (11% vs 7%). In the last 5 matches Fort Wayne has scored 8 goals and averages 1.4 points per game, while Greenville has scored 5 goals and averages 0.8 points per game, indicating better form and effectiveness for the hosts. Considering the league positions (6 vs 15), the hosts’ markedly better defense and superiority in chance creation, I predict a Fort Wayne win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Fort Wayne at home averages 1.43 goals scored and concedes 1.57, while Greenville away scores only 0.67 and concedes 1.67. xG supports this: Fort Wayne has xG 1.54 vs Greenville 1.22, with xG against 1.33 vs 1.57, plus more shots on target (4.86 vs 2.83) and higher conversion (11% vs 7%). Season BTTS rates show a divergence: Fort Wayne records BTTS in 57% of home games (league 55%), whereas Greenville away only 17%; in the last 5 matches it's 60% and 40% respectively. Interpretation: the stronger signal favors BTTS - Yes — Fort Wayne regularly scores and has a high share of BTTS games, and Greenville concedes frequently away (1.67), which increases the likelihood the hosts will score. The counterargument is Greenville’s low away goals average 0.67, which lowers the probability they score themselves, but the numerical balance and xG favor the Both Teams To Score scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Forecast based on xG and match statistics gives 1.56 expected goals for Fort Wayne (attack xG average 1.54 while Greenville concedes 1.57 xG) and 1.28 for Greenville (attack xG average 1.22 while Fort Wayne concedes 1.33), totaling 2.84 goals. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: Fort Wayne 71% and Greenville 83%; therefore I estimate Over 1.5 at about 78%. Fort Wayne averages 13.29 shots and 4.86 on target with a conversion rate of 11%, while Greenville averages 10.0 shots and 2.83 on target with 7% — this increases the chance of home goals. The 2.5 line is moderately likely: Fort Wayne has 71% of matches over 2.5 goals, Greenville 33%, so I estimate Over 2.5 at about 56%. The best pick is Over at 1.5 because the combined xG of 2.84 and high seasonal Over 1.5 rates (71%/83%) provide the strongest signal; Over 3.5 is rated unlikely (~24%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (Fort Wayne leads at the break and wins), which I assign a 38% probability. The basis is concrete figures: the home side average 1.0 goals by half-time versus Greenville’s 0.17, have 10 first-half goals versus 5 for the opposition, and led at the break in 43% of matches compared to 17% for their opponents. Over the full match Fort Wayne’s superiority is visible in their season averages of 1.43 goals versus 0.67, xG 1.54 versus 1.22, and 4.86 shots on target versus 2.83, so I also assign a meaningful probability to X/1 (22%) and 1/X (12%) as alternatives. However, the second half can produce goals and turnarounds — the hosts concede an average of 1.14 goals after the break, and the hosts’ second halves feature a goal in 71% of cases (83% for the away side), so I give 1/2 and X/2 low but non-zero chances (4% and 3%). Greenville have weaker overall numbers (season 0.67 goals and only a 17% win rate), so scenarios beginning with the visitors leading are least likely (13% combined).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fort Wayne | Greenville Triumph | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fort Wayne is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.4 pts / match - Greenville Triumph
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fort Wayne is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.08 goals / match - Greenville Triumph
Fort Wayne is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.62 goals / match - Greenville Triumph
Fort Wayne scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Greenville Triumph keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Greenville Triumph scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fort Wayne
Over / Under - Greenville Triumph
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fort Wayne is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.38 pts / match - Greenville Triumph
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Greenville Triumph - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fort Wayne
Greenville Triumph
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Fort Wayne | Liga | Greenville Triumph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 58% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 80% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph?
The USL League One match finished Fort Wayne 3:0 Greenville Triumph. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph?
Fort Wayne score 1.40 goals per game on average and Greenville Triumph 1.08. The USL League One average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Fort Wayne's matches and 38% of Greenville Triumph's.
What form are Fort Wayne and Greenville Triumph in?
Over the last 5 games Fort Wayne have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Greenville Triumph 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fort Wayne vs Greenville Triumph: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


