Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg: match statistics
Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fortuna Düsseldorf played Elversberg in 2. Bundesliga (Germany). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Fortuna Düsseldorf: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Elversberg: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fortuna Düsseldorf scores 0.94 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Elversberg scores 1.88 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fortuna Düsseldorf 53%, Elversberg 56%. Over 2.5: Fortuna Düsseldorf 53%, Elversberg 56%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Elversberg has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.43. Fortuna Düsseldorf: 12.8 shots per match, Elversberg: 15.1.
Match halves
Fortuna Düsseldorf: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.56. Elversberg: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.06.
Goals by minute
Fortuna Düsseldorf: 61-75 (7 goals). Elversberg: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. Bundesliga: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Elversberg is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd and have scored 60 goals this season versus Fortuna Düsseldorf’s 30. In the last 5 matches the visitors have netted 13 goals (2.6 per match) and averaged 1.6 points per game, while Fortuna have only 4 goals in their last 5 (0.8 per match) and 0.6 points per game. Elversberg averages 14.19 shots and 5.0 on target per match with a 12% conversion rate; Fortuna at home record 12.88 shots and 4.25 on target with a 9% conversion. Average xG is 1.59 for the visitors versus 1.48 for the hosts, indicating higher quality chances for the away side. Defensively Fortuna concede 1.56 goals on average at their stadium, while Elversberg concede 1.38 on the road; Fortuna’s home goal difference is -6 compared to the visitors’ +6 away, and in the last 5 matches Fortuna have let in 9 goals versus 7 conceded by Elversberg. Considering the shooting advantage (60 vs 30), superior xG and form (1.6 vs 0.6 pts in the last 5) and efficiency (12% vs 9%), I assign higher probability to the visitors’ victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I rate BTTS - Yes at 66% vs No at 34% because the league average BTTS is 59%, and the teams have season BTTS of 50% (Fortuna) and 63% (Elversberg), which already favors both teams scoring. Elversberg is a strong signal: in the last 5 matches BTTS is 80% and they average 2.6 goals scored (13 goals in 5), while Fortuna concedes on average 1.8 goals in the last 5, so the visitors have a real chance to score. Fortuna defends reasonably well over the season (0.88 goals conceded on average and 44% clean sheets), but their attack in the last 5 is only 0.8 goals per match, which reduces the chances of keeping a clean sheet. xG confirms the dynamic: xG for Fortuna 1.79 vs 1.59 for Elversberg, and xG against 1.16 and 1.38 suggests both teams generate ~1–2 expected goals, therefore the 'yes' scenario is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and form-based model indicates an advantage for the over markets: expected xG is about 1.59 for Fortuna and 1.37 for Elversberg, totaling ~2.96 goals. Fortuna score an average of 2.0 goals at home, Elversberg score 1.75 goals away (combined 3.75), and season percentages of matches over 1.5 are 69% for Fortuna and 94% for Elversberg, which strongly favors Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches both teams have averaged 3.4 goals combined (Fortuna 4 goals, Elversberg 13), although Fortuna is in weaker form (0.8 goals per match in the last 5). Season frequencies for Over 2.5 are 63% for Fortuna and 50% for Elversberg, so Over 2.5 is reasonable (estimated probability ~68%), whereas Over 3.5 is less certain (only ~38% seasonally). The strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-Time statistics show Elversberg led at the break in 8 matches (50%), while Fortuna led in 6 matches (38%) and the hosts were level at half-time in 7 cases (44%), so the strongest HT signal is an away lead at the break. Nevertheless, Fortuna is clearly stronger after the break — they have 63% wins in second halves, score an average of 1.63 goals after the break and have accumulated 34 points in second halves, which suggests a high capability for turnarounds. xG and defensive metrics confirm the hosts’ advantage — hosts’ xG is 1.79 versus 1.59 for the away side, Fortuna’s average conceded goals is 0.88 versus 1.38 for Elversberg, and the hosts average 15.94 shots versus 14.19 for the opponent with a higher conversion rate (13% vs 12%), all favoring a Fortuna victory in the final outcome. Minute-by-minute trends support the pattern: Elversberg scored 8 goals in minutes 31–45, whereas Fortuna scored 12 goals in minutes 76–90 while Elversberg conceded 5 goals in that phase, therefore the most likely scenario is an away lead at Half-Time and a Fortuna win Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fortuna Düsseldorf | Elversberg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Elversberg is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Fortuna Düsseldorf · 1.6 pts / match - Elversberg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Elversberg is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Fortuna Düsseldorf · 1.88 goals / match - Elversberg
Elversberg is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - Fortuna Düsseldorf · 1.13 goals / match - Elversberg
Fortuna Düsseldorf scores in 63% of matches (20 of 32 matches), while Elversberg keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).
Elversberg scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Fortuna Düsseldorf keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fortuna Düsseldorf
Over / Under - Elversberg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Elversberg is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Fortuna Düsseldorf · 1.63 pts / match - Elversberg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fortuna Düsseldorf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Elversberg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fortuna Düsseldorf
Elversberg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Fortuna Düsseldorf | Liga | Elversberg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.92 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 60% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 57% | • 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 23% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 70% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 85% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fortuna Düsseldorf 0 - 0 - 1 Elversberg. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg?
The 2. Bundesliga match finished Fortuna Düsseldorf 3:1 Elversberg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg?
Fortuna Düsseldorf score 0.94 goals per game on average and Elversberg 1.88. The 2. Bundesliga average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Fortuna Düsseldorf's matches and 56% of Elversberg's.
What form are Fortuna Düsseldorf and Elversberg in?
Over the last 5 games Fortuna Düsseldorf have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Elversberg 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg?
The statistical background for Fortuna Düsseldorf vs Elversberg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


