Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise: match statistics
Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Forward Madison played Athletic Club Boise in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Forward Madison: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Athletic Club Boise: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Forward Madison scores 1.33 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Athletic Club Boise scores 1.58 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Forward Madison 44%, Athletic Club Boise 58%. Over 2.5: Forward Madison 56%, Athletic Club Boise 58%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Athletic Club Boise has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.34. Forward Madison: 10.9 shots per match, Athletic Club Boise: 14.0.
Match halves
Forward Madison: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.33. Athletic Club Boise: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Forward Madison: 16-30 (5 goals). Athletic Club Boise: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Forward Madison: they have a 100% win rate at home and average 3.0 goals scored per match with 0.0 conceded, giving them a clear edge over Athletic Club Boise. Madison generates an average home xG of 2.29 per match with an average of 21 shots and 11 on target, and their home shot conversion rate is 14%, while Boise on the road has xG 1.47, averages 11.8 shots with 4.2 on target and 1.4 goals per match. Defensively the hosts are superior as well: Madison concedes an average xG against of 0.76 and 0.0 goals conceded at home, whereas Boise concedes 1.6 goals away and has xG against of 1.74. Recent form over the last 5 matches is mixed — Madison scored 4 goals with a 1W/4L record, and Boise scored 6 and conceded 10 with a 1W/1D/3L record. Considering Madison’s perfect home record, the xG advantage (2.29 vs 1.47) and substantially more shots on target (11 vs 4.2), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have similar BTTS rates this season: Forward Madison 57% and Athletic Club Boise 60%, matching the league BTTS average of 57% and indicating a propensity for mutual scoring. The signal from Boise is particularly strong: in the last 5 matches they have BTTS 80% (4 of 5), score on average 1.2 goals and concede 2.0 goals, and their recent xG for is 1.99, demonstrating simultaneous offensive activity and defensive vulnerability. Madison seasonally scores 1.71 goals, has xG 1.75 and averages 15.57 shots (4.86 on target) while conceding 1.14 goals — combined with the seasonal xG against Boise of 1.74 and 1.6 goals conceded this suggests both teams can find the net. A counterargument is Madison’s weaker attacking form in the last 5 matches (0.8 goals and only 20% BTTS), which lowers confidence, but given the seasonal 57–60% and Boise’s strong signal (80% in last 5 and xG 1.99) I project BTTS at 70% (Yes) versus 30% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Forward Madison has xG_for 1.75, Athletic has xG_against 1.74 — implying ~1.75 expected goals for the home side; Athletic has xG_for 1.47 and the hosts xG_against 1.18, giving ~1.33 for the visitors, totaling 3.08 expected goals. Seasonal metrics confirm attacking tendencies: Forward Madison has 100% of matches with >0.5 goals and 100% with >1.5, Athletic has 100% >0.5 and 60% >1.5, and Over 2.5 occurs this season in 57% and 60% respectively (average ~58.5%), versus a league average of 59%. BTTS occurs in 57% of home matches and 60% of away matches, and shot and conversion stats (Forward 15.57 shots and 4.86 SOT with 11% conversion, Athletic 11.8 and 4.2 SOT with 12% conversion) increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. A Poisson model with λ=3.08 yields about a 59% chance for Over 2.5 and ~37% for Over 3.5; accounting for recent form over the last 5 (Athletic has 80% Over 2.5 and last5 xG_for 1.99) I adjust the Over 2.5 probability to ~65%. In summary, Over 1.5 is rated ~92% (practically certain), but the best value play is Over 2.5 given xG 3.08, season Over 2.5 rates of 57%/60% and high BTTS 57%/60%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side led at the break in 4 matches (57%) and average 1.0 goals by half-time while conceding just 0.29, which is a strong signal for a Forward Madison lead at the break. Over 90 minutes the hosts average 1.71 goals and record 57% wins versus Athletic Club Boise’s 1.4 goals and 20% wins, and the points per game average of 1.86 vs 1.0 confirms Madison’s advantage. xG also favors the home team: xG 1.75 vs 1.47, while the visitors’ defense allows 1.74 xG against them; the hosts average 15.57 shots (vs 11.8) and 4.86 on target (vs 4.2), increasing the likelihood of maintaining a lead and securing a full-time victory. Additionally, the hosts’ HTPoints are 13 versus the visitors’ 4 and the half-time goal difference is +5 vs -1, therefore the strongest scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break and home win).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Forward Madison | Athletic Club Boise | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Athletic Club Boise is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Forward Madison · 1.4 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Club Boise is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Forward Madison · 1.58 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise
Forward Madison is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.22 goals / match - Forward Madison · 1.33 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise
Forward Madison scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Athletic Club Boise scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Forward Madison keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Forward Madison
Over / Under - Athletic Club Boise
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forward Madison is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Forward Madison · 1.42 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forward Madison - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Athletic Club Boise - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Forward Madison
Athletic Club Boise
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Forward Madison | Liga | Athletic Club Boise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.56 | 2.89 | • 2.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 58% | • 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 59% | • 58% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise?
The USL League One match finished Forward Madison 5:1 Athletic Club Boise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise?
Forward Madison score 1.33 goals per game on average and Athletic Club Boise 1.58. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Forward Madison's matches and 58% of Athletic Club Boise's.
What form are Forward Madison and Athletic Club Boise in?
Over the last 5 games Forward Madison have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Athletic Club Boise 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise?
The statistical background for Forward Madison vs Athletic Club Boise — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


