Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Forward Madison played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 30 July 2026. Final score: 5:2.
Current form
Forward Madison: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Forward Madison scores 1.93 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.87 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Forward Madison 53%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 53%. Over 2.5: Forward Madison 60%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 60%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Forward Madison: 12.5 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.1.
Match halves
Forward Madison: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.80. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.07.
Goals by minute
Forward Madison: 16-30 (10 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Forward Madison has a clear home advantage — averaging 3.2 goals scored and only 0.6 conceded, with average xG per match 2.06 versus xG against 0.96, and unbeaten in the last 5 home fixtures (wwdww). Visitors Chattanooga score 1.71 goals away and concede the same (1.71); their away xG is 1.54 with xG against 1.61, indicating weaker defensive efficiency. Additionally, the hosts register substantially more shots and shots on target: 19.4 shots and 7.2 on target per home match versus the visitors' 12.86 shots and 5.0 on target per away match, and 52% possession vs 36% demonstrates control of the game. Defensive metrics further bolster Forward’s edge — 40% clean sheets at home and a home goal difference of +13, while Chattanooga have 0% clean sheets on the road and concede 1.71 goals per away game. Considering the hosts’ 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus the visitors’ 8 and the recent points per game of 2.6 for Forward vs 1.8 for Chattanooga over the last 5, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics show mixed signals but with a slight lean toward BTTS: Chattanooga has a seasonal BTTS rate of 86% and 0% clean sheets away, while Forward Madison has a seasonal BTTS 29% and 57% clean sheets at home. Forward Madison averages 2.14 goals scored and 0.71 conceded per match for the season, but in the last 5 matches they average 2.6 scored and 1.0 conceded (13 goals for and 5 against in the last 5), indicating their defense has recently been less watertight. Chattanooga has offensive xG 1.54 and xG against 1.61, and averages 1.71 goals for and 1.71 against per match, with 86% of their games finishing over 2.5 goals; although their BTTS in the last 5 matches dropped to 40%, the away lack of clean sheets (0%) points to a high likelihood of conceding. Both teams generate similar chances: xG 1.51 (Forward Madison) vs 1.54 (Chattanooga) and average shots 12.14 vs 12.86, and FM’s 18% finishing vs the visitors’ 13% increases the real chance of goals from both sides. Considering Chattanooga’s 86% BTTS, the rise in Forward Madison’s BTTS to 60% in the last 5 (vs season 29%) and 57% vs 0% clean sheets, the 'both teams to score' play looks stronger — forecast: yes 66% / no 34%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis points to a match with elevated goal potential: Forward Madison scores on average 2.14 goals per home match and concedes 0.71, while Chattanooga scores 1.71 goals per away match and concedes 1.71. xG comparison shows the home side xG at 1.51 versus the away opponents’ xG of 1.61 (average 1.56 xG for the home team in this matchup), and the visitors’ xG is 1.54 versus 1.51 for the hosts (approx. 1.53 xG for the away side). Averaging actual goals (2.14 and 1.71) with xG values yields projected ~1.77 goals for the home team and ~1.42 for the visitors, i.e. about 3.19 goals in total. Additionally, Chattanooga has 86% of matches Over 2.5 this season, Forward Madison 43%, and the league average is 60% Over 2.5; in the last 5 matches Forward had 60% Over 2.5 while Chattanooga had 40%. Forward has 57% clean sheets at home, whereas Chattanooga has none on the road (0%), so despite the hosts’ defensive quality I project Over 2.5 as the best option — estimated probability for Over 2.5 is ~62%, Over 1.5 ~83%, and Over 3.5 ~40%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics favor the home side: Forward Madison scores an average of 2.14 goals per match versus 1.71 for the visitors and concedes only 0.71 goals per match, while Chattanooga concedes on average 1.71. At half-time the home team scores on average 1.0 goal and leads at the break in 43% of matches, and in the last 5 fixtures they led at the break in 100% of cases; visitors score 0.71 by half-time on average and lead at the break in only 29% of matches. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.51 for the home side vs 1.54 for the away side), but Forward Madison has higher efficiency (conversion rate 18% vs 13%) and a superior home win rate (71% wins versus 43% for the visitors). Additionally, the home team has 57% clean sheets this season, while the visitors have 0% clean sheets, which increases the probability that Forward Madison will maintain the lead and win; hence the choice HT/FT = 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Forward Madison | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forward Madison is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Forward Madison · 2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forward Madison is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Forward Madison · 1.13 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Forward Madison scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Forward Madison keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Forward Madison
Over / Under — Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forward Madison is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.13 pts / match - Forward Madison · 1.47 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Forward Madison - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 60%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Forward Madison
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Forward Madison | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.93 | 2.85 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Forward Madison 1 - 0 - 1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Forward Madison 5:2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Forward Madison and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Forward Madison won 1, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Forward Madison score 1.93 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.87. The USL League One average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Forward Madison's matches and 53% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Forward Madison and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Forward Madison have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The statistical background for Forward Madison vs Chattanooga Red Wolves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


