Fram vs Valur: match statistics
Fram vs Valur: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fram play Valur in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 8 May 2026 at 21:15. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Valur: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fram scores 2.73 and concedes 1.87 goals per match. Valur scores 1.63 and concedes 2.00. League average: 4.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fram 73%, Valur 69%. Over 2.5: Fram 73%, Valur 69%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Fram has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.67. Fram: 17.7 shots per match, Valur: 14.0.
Match halves
Fram: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.40. Valur: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). Valur: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 3-0-1. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 75%.
Match description
Fram holds an edge in chance quality and game control: home average xG is 1.84 versus Valur’s 1.51, and possession is 50% vs 38%. At home Fram averages 3.67 goals with 5.67 on-target shots and a 24% conversion rate, while Valur away averages 4.00 goals with 6.0 on-target shots and a higher conversion of ~29%. Defensively the hosts are more stable — Fram concedes 1.67 goals per home match with xG against 1.32, whereas Valur concedes 2.00 away with xG against 2.38, indicating greater risk from the visitors. Form is similar (Fram 3-1-1 in the last 5, averaging 2.0 points per game; Valur 3-0-2 averaging 1.8 points), but Fram remains unbeaten at home (0% losses, 67% wins), which favors the hosts. Considering Fram’s superior xG and game control I forecast a home win, though I expect an open, high-scoring game given average total goals of 5.33 for Fram and 6.0 for Valur.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fram | Valur | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fram is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Fram · 0.8 pts / match - Valur
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 67% better for: goals scored per match.
2.73 goals / match - Fram · 1.63 goals / match - Valur
Fram is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.87 goals / match - Fram · 2 goals / match - Valur
Fram scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
Valur scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Fram
Over / Under — Valur
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Fram · 1.31 pts / match - Valur
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fram - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Valur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fram
Valur
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Fram | Liga | Valur | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.60 | 4.04 | ▼ 3.63 |
| Both teams scored | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 73% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Clean sheets | • 13% | 14% | • 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 82% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Fram 3 - 0 - 1 Valur. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fram vs Valur?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 3:2 Valur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fram and Valur?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Fram won 3, Valur won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs Valur?
Fram score 2.73 goals per game on average and Valur 1.63. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Fram's matches and 69% of Valur's.
What form are Fram and Valur in?
Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Valur 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs Valur?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Fram vs Valur: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.