Fratria vs Dunav 2010: match statistics
Fratria vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fratria played Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 11 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Fratria: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Dunav 2010: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fratria scores 1.83 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.69 and concedes 0.41. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fratria 55%, Dunav 2010 28%. Over 2.5: Fratria 48%, Dunav 2010 34%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Fratria has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.47. Fratria: 12.0 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.2.
Match halves
Fratria: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.93. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Fratria: 61-75 (15 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win: Fratria average 2.29 goals per home match, registering 13.36 shots of which 7.5 are on target and maintaining a 17% conversion rate; they have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches. Visitors Dunav 2010 lead the table (position 1) with a season record of 19 wins, 8 draws and 2 losses and an excellent defense (only 12 goals conceded in the season and 0.64 goals conceded away), yielding 50% clean sheets on the road. Despite that, Fratria post higher expected goals at home (xG 1.83 vs xG 1.37 for Dunav away) and a much lower percentage of matches without scoring (7% vs 21% for the visitors), indicating superior quality and consistency in chance creation for the hosts. Additionally Fratria have averaged 1.6 points and 2.0 goals (10 goals) over the last 5 matches, while Dunav have scored only 4 goals in their last 5 and average 1.2 points, suggesting the hosts are in better attacking form. Considering Fratria’s advantages in chance creation (higher xG and more shots on target) and Dunav’s recent drop in effectiveness, I assign Fratria a 60% probability to win, 23% for a draw and 17% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict No BTTS. Fratria at home has a seasonal BTTS rate of 13% and keeps a clean sheet in 87% of home matches, conceding an average of 0.2 goals per home game. Dunav scores an average of 1.5 goals on the road and has an away BTTS of 43%, but in the last 5 matches they averaged only 0.8 goals and generated xG around 1.1, indicating reduced attacking efficiency. xG comparison shows Dunav’s away xG at 1.37 versus Fratria’s home xG against at 0.67 — a 0.70 difference suggesting Dunav’s scoring potential will be limited by Fratria’s defense. Although Fratria had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and conceded 1.2 goals on average in that period, the dominant seasonal defensive indicators (CS 87%, 0.2 goals conceded at home, seasonal BTTS only 13%) are decisive, so I rate the ‘No’ scenario as more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG-based forecast: Fratria has xG_for 1.56 and Dunav xG_against 1.35 — yielding an expected 1.46 goals for Fratria; Dunav has xG_for 1.37 versus Fratria xG_against 0.67, yielding an expected 1.02 goals for Dunav; total 2.48 expected goals. Season-long metrics support Over 1.5: Fratria has 73% of matches with more than 1.5 goals, Dunav 64%, and the league averages 2.49 goals per match, so the 1.5 line is naturally favorable for the Over. The 2.5 line is less certain — season Over2.5 rates are 33% (Fratria) and 36% (Dunav), and with 2.48 expected goals the model gives roughly a 45% chance for Over 2.5, indicating an edge to the Under. Over 3.5 is unlikely: season values 20%/21% and a model probability ~24% argue against that line. Additionally, Fratria averages 7.2 shots on target versus Dunav’s 5.29 and has 87% clean sheets this season, so the strongest and most justified signal is Over 1.5 (approx. 71% probability).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fratria led at half-time in 9 matches (60% of appearances) and scores on average 0.93 goals by the break, indicating frequent leads by half-time. Fratria wins 73% of home matches and has 87% clean sheets for the season and 100% clean sheets at half-time, so a lead at the break is rarely lost. Offensive-defensive metrics support this: home xG is 1.56 versus Dunav 2010's 1.37, while xG conceded against Fratria is only 0.67 versus 1.35 for the visitors; the home side also registers more shots on target (7.2 vs 5.29). A half-time draw occurs for the home team in 40% of matches, so the Half-Time/Full-Time draw/home (X/1) scenario receives the second-highest weight, whereas an away win is considered unlikely given Fratria's 0% home defeats and the low both-teams-to-score rate for the hosts (13%). In the last 5 matches Fratria led at the break in 80% of cases and averaged 1.2 goals before half-time, further strengthening the signal for 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fratria | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 56% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fratria is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Fratria · 1.2 pts / match - Dunav 2010
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fratria is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - Fratria · 1.69 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Dunav 2010 is 127% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Fratria · 0.41 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Fratria scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 69% (20 of 29 matches).
Dunav 2010 scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while Fratria keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fratria
Over / Under - Dunav 2010
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dunav 2010 is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.9 pts / match - Fratria · 2.07 pts / match - Dunav 2010
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fratria - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dunav 2010 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fratria
Dunav 2010
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Fratria | Liga | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.76 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 45% | ▼ 28% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | • 34% | 33% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FratriaGoalIvan BriknerAssist: Daniel Todorov Halachev
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Fratria 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fratria vs Dunav 2010?
The Second League match finished Fratria 2:2 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fratria vs Dunav 2010?
Fratria score 1.83 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.69. The Second League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Fratria's matches and 28% of Dunav 2010's.
What form are Fratria and Dunav 2010 in?
Over the last 5 games Fratria have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Dunav 2010 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fratria vs Dunav 2010?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


