Fredericia vs Silkeborg: match statistics
Fredericia vs Silkeborg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fredericia played Silkeborg in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Fredericia: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Silkeborg: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fredericia scores 1.32 and concedes 2.16 goals per match. Silkeborg scores 1.29 and concedes 2.03. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fredericia 61%, Silkeborg 55%. Over 2.5: Fredericia 71%, Silkeborg 65%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Fredericia has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.34. Fredericia: 11.7 shots per match, Silkeborg: 11.5.
Match halves
Fredericia: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.61. Silkeborg: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Fredericia: 76-90+ (10 goals). Silkeborg: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Silkeborg is the favorite based on form: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (average 2.0 points per match), while Fredericia have not won any of their last 5 fixtures (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses, average 0.6 points per match). The visitors also show markedly better chance conversion — a 14% conversion rate away versus 8% for the home side, and Fredericia have 40% of home games without scoring compared to 27% for Silkeborg on the road. Defensively both teams are prone to conceding: Fredericia concede on average 2.13 goals at home (average xG against 1.90), Silkeborg 2.47 goals away (average xG against 2.02), however in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 9 goals (1.8 per match) versus 11 conceded by the hosts (2.2 per match). Fredericia create slightly more quality chances at home (average xG 1.47 and 13.07 shots) than Silkeborg do away (xG 1.21 and 10.53 shots), but lower conversion and a higher share of scoreless games limit their realistic prospects. Considering Silkeborg’s better form and efficiency and the tendency for high-scoring games between these sides (average 3.2 goals in Fredericia’s matches and 3.93 in Silkeborg’s away games), I estimate the probabilities as: away win 55%, draw 25%, home win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes at 68% probability because Silkeborg has a season BTTS rate of 67% versus Fredericia’s 44%, and both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches. The league average BTTS is 59% and clean sheets are rare: Fredericia kept a clean sheet in 13% of matches, Silkeborg only 7%, which raises the likelihood of goals from both sides. Fredericia posts xG 1.46 and averages 1.13 goals per match, while Silkeborg concedes 2.47 goals per match on average (xG against 2.02), meaning Fredericia creates chances against a vulnerable opponent. Countering this is the fact Fredericia failed to score in 50% of their season matches, but Silkeborg is more efficient (conversion 14% vs Fredericia 9%) and away fixtures feature 87% of Silkeborg’s matches with over 2.5 goals, which ultimately strengthens the BTTS signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The calculated expected goals are 1.74 for Fredericia and 1.46 for Silkeborg, giving a combined xG of 3.20 and suggesting a match around 3 goals. A Poisson model for total xG=3.20 yields probability of Over 1.5 goals at ~83% (at least 2 goals), Over 2.5 at ~62% (at least 3) and Over 3.5 at ~40% (at least 4). Seasonal data confirm a propensity for goals: Fredericia has Over 1.5 in 88% of matches, Silkeborg in 93%, and Silkeborg has Over 2.5 in 87% of fixtures, which further increases the chance of Over 2.5. Both-teams-to-score stats also support goals — Fredericia 44% and Silkeborg 67% on the season, with last 5-match averages of 1.4 and 1.8 goals respectively (combined 3.2). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 due to the high combined probability (~83%) and alignment of xG with seasonal indicators, therefore I recommend a bet on Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Silkeborg has a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they have won 60% of games, whereas Fredericia have won none (60% vs 0%). In the last 5 matches Silkeborg led at the break in 40% of cases, and Fredericia only in 20%, while Fredericia were trailing at the break in 60% of matches (40% vs 20% vs 60%), suggesting the visitors are more often leading after 45 minutes. In second halves Silkeborg average 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for Fredericia and have won the second half in 60% of games (1.0 vs 0.6; 60% vs 20%), so the visitors have a greater chance to maintain or achieve a turnaround after the break. Seasonal numbers support the visitors’ effectiveness: Silkeborg score an average 1.47 goals with a 14% conversion rate compared to Fredericia’s 1.13 goals with a 9% conversion rate; despite Fredericia having a higher xG (1.46 vs 1.21), the hosts’ poorer finishing translates into lower chances of a Full-Time victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fredericia | Silkeborg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Silkeborg is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Fredericia · 2 pts / match - Silkeborg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Silkeborg is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.16 goals / match - Fredericia · 2.03 goals / match - Silkeborg
Fredericia scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 matches).
Silkeborg scores in 61% of matches (19 of 31 matches), while Fredericia keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fredericia
Over / Under - Silkeborg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Silkeborg is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Fredericia · 1.16 pts / match - Silkeborg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fredericia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Silkeborg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fredericia
Silkeborg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Fredericia | Liga | Silkeborg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.48 | 3.04 | ▲ 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 59% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 23% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 78% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Fredericia 2 - 1 - 0 Silkeborg. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fredericia vs Silkeborg?
The Superliga match finished Fredericia 4:1 Silkeborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fredericia and Silkeborg?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fredericia won 2, Silkeborg won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fredericia vs Silkeborg?
Fredericia score 1.32 goals per game on average and Silkeborg 1.29. The Superliga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Fredericia's matches and 55% of Silkeborg's.
What form are Fredericia and Silkeborg in?
Over the last 5 games Fredericia have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Silkeborg 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fredericia vs Silkeborg?
The statistical background for Fredericia vs Silkeborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


