Fredrikstad vs Sandefjord: match statistics
Fredrikstad vs Sandefjord: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fredrikstad played Sandefjord in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Fredrikstad: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Sandefjord: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fredrikstad scores 1.15 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Sandefjord scores 1.00 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fredrikstad 69%, Sandefjord 54%. Over 2.5: Fredrikstad 62%, Sandefjord 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Sandefjord has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.31. Fredrikstad: 11.4 shots per match, Sandefjord: 14.1.
Match halves
Fredrikstad: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.62. Sandefjord: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Fredrikstad: 31-45+ (4 goals). Sandefjord: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-2-0. Average goals 1.60, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fredrikstad are the favorites for this match: at home they have a 50% win rate, while Sandefjord win only 29% of away games, and the goal difference is +1 for the hosts versus -5 for the visitors. The hosts score on average 1.5 goals per home game (average xG 1.54), while Sandefjord score 1.0 goals away (xG 1.41); additionally Fredrikstad concede 1.33 goals at home on average versus 1.71 conceded by Sandefjord away. In the last 5 matches Fredrikstad scored 3 and conceded 9, averaging 0.8 points per game, whereas Sandefjord scored 5 and conceded 10, earning 0.4 points per game, so the visitors are currently less efficient in points. Shot statistics are similar (13.67 vs 13.57 attempts), but Fredrikstad have better conversion at 11% versus Sandefjord’s 7% and a similar number of shots on target (3.83 vs 4.0); however the hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet at home (0%) compared to 14% clean sheets for the visitors away. Based on this, I expect a home win, with a moderate chance of a draw and a small chance of an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal profiles of the two teams diverge: Fredrikstad has BTTS in 29% of home matches, while Sandefjord records BTTS in 71% of their games; the league average BTTS is 55%. In the last five matches Fredrikstad had BTTS in 40% of cases, and Sandefjord in 80%, with both teams conceding on average 1.8 and 2.0 goals respectively in those five fixtures. xG metrics indicate both teams create chances: Fredrikstad’s attacking xG is 1.49 versus Sandefjord’s defensive xG of 1.65, and Sandefjord’s attacking xG is 1.41 versus Fredrikstad’s defensive xG of 1.63. Fredrikstad scores on average 0.86 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 43% of home matches, while Sandefjord scores 1.0 goal per game and concedes 1.71 goals seasonally with only 14% clean sheets; this gives a mixed signal but favors a Both Teams To Score scenario due to Sandefjord’s greater vulnerability to conceding. Considering Sandefjord’s dominant signal (71% seasonally and 80% in the last 5) alongside the league BTTS average of 55% and similar xG and shots on target averages (4.29 vs 4.0), I back BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 70% versus 30% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I assess expected goals at 1.57 for Fredrikstad and 1.52 for Sandefjord, totaling 3.09 expected goals. Both teams generate relatively high xG: Fredrikstad 1.49 xG and Sandefjord 1.41 xG, while conceding 1.63 and 1.65 xG respectively, which suggests potential for goals from both sides. Historically both teams register 71% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and in the last 5 fixtures Sandefjord had 80% of matches over 2.5 versus 40% for Fredrikstad, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. A Poisson model with lambda=3.09 yields approximately 81% for Over 1.5, ~60% for Over 2.5 and ~37% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5. I therefore recommend backing the Over side on the 1.5 line as the safest choice, since the combined xG of 3.09 and the historical 71% of matches >1.5 strongly support this option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fredrikstad score an average of 0.86 goals and concede 1.14 per home match, while Sandefjord score 1.0 and concede 1.71, indicating greater susceptibility of the visitors to conceding. xG is similar (1.49 for Fredrikstad vs. 1.41 for Sandefjord), but Sandefjord lose 71% of matches and concede on average 1.0 goal before the break, suggesting problems for the visitors already in the first half. Fredrikstad have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 71% of home games and were leading at the break in 29% of appearances with 43% draws, so the most likely HT signal is a home lead or a draw with the hosts’ statistical edge. The hosts scored 3 goals in the 61–75 minute window and have a higher total half-time points tally (9 points total, average 1.29 vs. 6 points and 0.86 for the visitors), which reinforces the scenario of maintaining a lead. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the variant of Fredrikstad leading at half-time and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fredrikstad | Sandefjord | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fredrikstad is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Fredrikstad · 0.4 pts / match - Sandefjord
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fredrikstad is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Fredrikstad · 1 goals / match - Sandefjord
Sandefjord is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.77 goals / match - Fredrikstad · 1.31 goals / match - Sandefjord
Fredrikstad scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Sandefjord keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
Sandefjord scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Fredrikstad keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Fredrikstad
Over / Under — Sandefjord
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sandefjord is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Fredrikstad · 1.15 pts / match - Sandefjord
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fredrikstad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sandefjord - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fredrikstad
Sandefjord
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Fredrikstad | Liga | Sandefjord | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.92 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 57% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 77% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 78% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Fredrikstad 3 - 2 - 0 Sandefjord. Average goals 1.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fredrikstad vs Sandefjord?
The Eliteserien match finished Fredrikstad 1:0 Sandefjord. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fredrikstad and Sandefjord?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Fredrikstad won 3, Sandefjord won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fredrikstad vs Sandefjord?
Fredrikstad score 1.15 goals per game on average and Sandefjord 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Fredrikstad's matches and 54% of Sandefjord's.
What form are Fredrikstad and Sandefjord in?
Over the last 5 games Fredrikstad have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sandefjord 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fredrikstad vs Sandefjord?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


