Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

FS Jelgava vs Auda: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
2 : 3half-time 2:1
Auda crest
Auda

FS Jelgava vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Auda: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 0.57 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Auda scores 1.57 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 43%, Auda 71%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 29%, Auda 57%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.24. FS Jelgava: 9.7 shots per match, Auda: 13.3.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.14. Auda: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 0-15 (1 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the clear favorite in this fixture: they sit 3rd in the table versus FS Jelgava in 8th, and have scored 11 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 4. In attack the visitors show superior metrics — Auda averages 1.5 goals away, produces 13 shots (4.75 on target) and posts a 12% conversion rate, while Jelgava at home averages 0.5 goals, 9 shots (3 on target) and a 6% conversion. The quality of chances also favors Auda: average xG for the visitors on the road is 1.51 versus 1.21 xG for Jelgava at home, while xG against is 1.03 for Auda compared to 1.6 for Jelgava. The form trend is unambiguous — in the last 5 matches Jelgava have scored only 1 goal, failed to win any game (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses) and average 0.2 points per match, whereas Auda have scored 7 goals in their last 5, won 2 games and average 1.4 points per match. Additionally Auda have had no blanks on the road (0% goalless away performances) versus 75% of Jelgava’s home matches without a goal, therefore I forecast a win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches FS Jelgava have averaged only 0.2 goals scored and 2.4 goals conceded, with BTTS in their last 5 at 20%. Visitors Auda have BTTS at 80% in their last 5, averaging 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded per match, but seasonally Auda record 50% clean sheets and only 0.5 goals conceded per game. Seasonal xG indicates scoring potential: home xG 1.68 versus xG against Auda 1.03, and away xG 1.51 versus xG against the hosts 1.58, while the hosts’ seasonal BTTS rate is 100% against a league average of 60%. Despite these seasonal signals, the key factor is Jelgava’s form drop (0.2 goals in the last 5 vs season 1.67) and the high number of goals conceded by the hosts (2.4 in the last 5 and 2.0 seasonally), which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Therefore I assign a higher probability to the 'No' market at 60% versus 40% for 'Yes', because Jelgava’s poor finishing in the last 5 (0.2) and Auda’s solid seasonal defensive numbers (0.5 average conceded and 50% CS) outweigh the hosts’ seasonal BTTS rate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.36 for FS Jelgava and 1.54 for Auda (total 2.90); this valuation factors in both teams' xG: 1.68 (Jelgava) and 1.51 (Auda) as well as xG against: 1.03 (Auda) and 1.58 (Jelgava). A strong confirmation for Over is that the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 100% for the home side and 75% for the visitors, and both teams average 13+ shots (13.67 and 13.0) with 5.33 and 4.75 shots on target. Additionally, Jelgava has not kept a clean sheet this season (CS 0%) and has a season BTTS of 100%, while Auda has 50% clean sheets but scored 7 goals in the last 5 rounds (1.4 average) versus 1 goal for Jelgava (0.2 average), which increases the likelihood of goal volatility. The combined xG for both teams is 3.19 (1.68+1.51), and with equal 12% shooting conversion for both sides and the head-to-head and season history (high seasonOver1.5 and shot volumes), the strongest and safest pick is Over 1.5; the 2.5 line has a moderate probability (~60%), and 3.5 is risky (~25%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the away team leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time (2/2) — I assess its probability at 35%. Auda led at the break in 3 of 4 recorded cases (leadingAtHT_away = 3, leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 75%), scores on average 0.75 goals by Half-Time (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.75) and does not concede goals by Half-Time (concededAVGHT_away = 0.0), whereas Jelgava averages 0.67 scored and 0.67 conceded by Half-Time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.67, concededAVGHT_home = 0.67). After 90 minutes the favorite is the away side: Auda has seasonPPG_away = 2.5 and a 75% win rate (winPercentage_away = 75%), while Jelgava has seasonPPG_home = 1.0 with a 33% win rate (winPercentage_home = 33%), and hosts concede on average 2.0 goals per match versus 0.5 for the away side (seasonConcededAVG_home = 2.0, seasonConcededAVG_away = 0.5). The home team records 100% of home matches with both teams scoring (seasonBTTSPercentage_home = 100%), so alternative scenarios are Half-Time draw and away win (X/2 — 15%) or away leading at Half-Time and a turnaround to draw/hold (2/X — 10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
FS JelgavaAuda
5Shots16
FS JelgavaAuda
2Shots on target5
FS JelgavaAuda
0.73xG1.83
FS JelgavaAuda
1Corners5
FS JelgavaAuda
36Dangerous attacks65
FS JelgavaAuda
17Fouls23
FS JelgavaAuda
4Cards2
FS JelgavaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.57
FS JelgavaAuda
2Goals conceded / match1.14
FS JelgavaAuda
45%Average possession54%
FS JelgavaAuda
2.86Shots on target / match5
FS JelgavaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match13.29
FS JelgavaAuda
2.86Shots on target5
FS JelgavaAuda
5.9%Shot conversion11.8%
FS JelgavaAuda
45%Possession54%
FS JelgavaAuda
1.24xG for1.58
FS JelgavaAuda
1.7xG against1.27
FS JelgavaAuda

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedAuda: Balanced
FS JelgavaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)29%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.4 pts / match - Auda

FS Jelgava
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W29% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
WLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Auda
LWWLD
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 away
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 175% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.57 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.14 goals / match - Auda

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

4Goals scored (season)11
FS JelgavaAuda
14Goals conceded (season)8
FS JelgavaAuda
2.57Average goals in match2.71
FS JelgavaAuda
1Goals scored (last 5)7
FS JelgavaAuda
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal100%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%2 goals57%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%3 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal71%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%2 goals29%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%3 goals14%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Scored in both halves43%
FS JelgavaAuda

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%BTTS - last 580%
FS JelgavaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
FS JelgavaAuda
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FS JelgavaAuda

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 2 pts / match - Auda

FS Jelgava - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Auda - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)2
FS JelgavaAuda
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.71
FS JelgavaAuda
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
FS JelgavaAuda
1.14Average goals (1st half)1
FS JelgavaAuda
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
FS JelgavaAuda
57%No goal before half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.14
FS JelgavaAuda
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
FS JelgavaAuda
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
FS JelgavaAuda
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.71
FS JelgavaAuda
43%Clean sheet after half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda
86%No goal after half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda

FS Jelgava - second-half results

14% W29% R57% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - second-half results

14% W71% R14% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 2.572.75 2.71
Both teams scored 43%61% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%47% 57%
Clean sheets 0%19% 29%
Goal before half-time 86%78% 86%
Goal after half-time 71%83% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.56
Away goals / match
+-24%
Home attack advantage
+-31%
Home defence advantage
+-19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaGoalAlans KangarsAssist: Leo's Prior
  2. AudaYellow cardOskars Rubenis
  3. FS JelgavaGoalRoberts MeļķisAssist: Glebs Žaleiko
  4. FS JelgavaYellow cardGļebs Kačanovs
  5. AudaGoalJosé MendietaAssist: Tin Hrvoj
  6. FS JelgavaYellow cardArtūrs Janovskis
  7. AudaYellow cardWally Fofana
  8. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Gļebs PatikaOff: Roberts Meļķis
  9. FS JelgavaYellow cardAlans Kangars
  10. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Aleksandrs ButovskisOff: Glebs Žaleiko
  11. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ousmane CamaraOff: José Mendieta
  12. FS JelgavaYellow cardAleksandrs Butovskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): FS Jelgava 1 - 1 - 2 Auda. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 2:3 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Auda?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, Auda won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Auda?

FS Jelgava score 0.57 goals per game on average and Auda 1.57. The Virsliga average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 71% of Auda's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Auda 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.