FS Jelgava vs Liepāja: match statistics
FS Jelgava vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FS Jelgava played Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Liepāja: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.27 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FS Jelgava 43%, Liepāja 55%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 39%, Liepāja 59%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Liepāja has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.30. FS Jelgava: 10.6 shots per match, Liepāja: 12.4.
Match halves
FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43. Liepāja: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-3. Average goals 2.17, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win: FS Jelgava averages 1.08 goals scored and concedes 1.67 at home, while Liepāja on the road records only 0.73 goals scored and 2.09 conceded. Visitors have higher away xG (1.57 vs 1.38 for Jelgava), more shots (13.64 vs 11.5) and 54% possession versus 45% for the hosts, but their conversion is only 5% compared to Jelgava’s 9%, which limits actual goals scored. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 goals and average 1.2 points, while Liepāja scored 8 goals and averages 1.8 points, yet the visitors’ away form is poor (64% losses away and away goal difference -15). Additionally, Jelgava has a higher clean sheet rate at home (17% vs 9%) and a lower home loss rate (50% vs the guests’ 64% away losses), so I expect better conversion and a more solid home defence to decide a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Jelgava averages 1.82 goals scored per match while Liepāja concedes 2.09 per match, putting the home side in a strong position to get on the scoresheet. Conversely, Liepāja only scores 0.73 goals per match, limiting their own scoring threat and providing a counterargument against BTTS - Yes. However, seasonal BTTS rates are 64% for Jelgava and 45% for Liepāja versus a league average of 56%, and the visitors have only 9% of matches with a clean sheet expected, which favors a Goal/Goal outcome. Additionally, xG of 1.42 (Jelgava) and 1.57 (Liepāja) yields a combined value of approximately 2.99 (league average 2.98), and Jelgava records 5.0 shots on target with a 16% conversion compared to 3.64 and 5% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the specific figures (1.82 vs 2.09, 64% BTTS for the home team and the low 9% clean sheet rate for the visitors), the strongest signal is BTTS - Yes with an estimated confidence of 62% versus 38% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal stats indicate a high probability of at least two goals: FS Jelgava score an average of 1.82 goals at home and 91% of their matches finish Over 1.5, while Liepāja have 73% of away matches Over 1.5. Teams' xG are similar (1.42 for Jelgava vs 1.57 for Liepāja) and a simple attack/defense average gives expected goals of 1.49 for the home side and 1.50 for the visitors, totaling 2.99 goals. Additionally, Liepāja concede 2.09 goals per match on average, and Jelgava have a much higher shot conversion (16% vs 5% for the away team), which raises the risk of home goals. Season-long over indicators confirm this: Over 2.5 occurred in 64% of Jelgava’s matches and 55% of Liepāja’s matches (the league average is 2.98 goals per game), so Over 2.5 also has an edge, however the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (the combination of 91% and 73% plus the expected 2.99 goals), hence the recommendation for the Over side on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The key signal is Jelgava's first-half advantage: the hosts led at the break in 7 of their matches to date (64%) and score an average of 1.00 goals by half-time versus 0.18 for Liepāja. Over the season Jelgava averages 1.82 goals per match while Liepāja has only 0.73; simultaneously the visitors concede an average of 2.09 goals per match, which further supports a home win. Although the visitors’ xG is 1.57 versus 1.42 for the hosts, Liepāja’s shot conversion is just 5% compared to 16% for Jelgava, so the visitors create chances but convert them poorly. Additionally, in the second half the hosts score an average of 0.82 goals and the visitors 0.55, suggesting that Jelgava’s lead at the break has a strong chance of holding and the match being closed out as a home victory (hence the HT/FT 1/1 recommendation).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FS Jelgava | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FS Jelgava is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 0.6 pts / match - Liepāja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Liepāja is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.27 goals / match - Liepāja
Liepāja is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.55 goals / match - Liepāja
FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
Over / Under - Liepāja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FS Jelgava is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.23 pts / match - Liepāja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FS Jelgava
Liepāja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| FS Jelgava | Liga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.74 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 56% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): FS Jelgava 0 - 3 - 3 Liepāja. Average goals 2.17, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Liepāja?
The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 0:2 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Liepāja?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 0, Liepāja won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Liepāja?
FS Jelgava score 1.04 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.27. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 55% of Liepāja's.
What form are FS Jelgava and Liepāja in?
Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Liepāja 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Liepāja?
The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Liepāja — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


