FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: match statistics
FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FUS Rabat played CODM Meknès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 29 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
FUS Rabat: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. CODM Meknès: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
FUS Rabat scores 1.19 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. CODM Meknès scores 0.75 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FUS Rabat 56%, CODM Meknès 25%. Over 2.5: FUS Rabat 44%, CODM Meknès 19%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
FUS Rabat has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.04. FUS Rabat: 10.4 shots per match, CODM Meknès: 8.8.
Match halves
FUS Rabat: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.56. CODM Meknès: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
FUS Rabat: 31-45+ (5 goals). CODM Meknès: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FUS Rabat holds a clear offensive edge in this matchup: at home they average 1.29 goals per game (19 total this season), have an average xG of 1.45 and 4.57 shots on target per match, while CODM Meknès score only 0.43 goals away, have xG 1.04 and just 1.57 shots on target. In the last five matches FUS scored 8 goals, won 3 games and average 1.8 points per match, whereas CODM have scored only 2 goals, won 2 matches and average 1.4 points per match in this period. Defensively the visitors are stronger on the road — they concede 1.0 goal per away game and kept a clean sheet in 43% of away appearances, while FUS at home concede 1.29 goals and have only 14% clean sheets. The difference in efficiency is significant: FUS converts about 12% of shots into goals versus 5% for CODM, and the share of matches without a goal is 14% for the hosts against 71% for the visitors, indicating the hosts more regularly turn created chances into goals. Considering the higher xG (1.45 vs 1.04), greater number of shots on target (4.57 vs 1.57) and better form over the last five games, I predict a FUS Rabat win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show low BTTS rates this season: FUS Rabat only 22% and CODM Meknès 29%, both well below the league average of 48%, indicating Goal/Goal outcomes are rare. FUS keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concedes on average 0.56 goals per match this season, while CODM scores only 0.43 goals per match season-to-date and has scored 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 avg), which significantly reduces the visitors' chances. In the last 5 fixtures FUS scored 8 and conceded 8 goals (1.6 avg) and registered 60% BTTS in that period, but CODM has 0% BTTS in the last 5, i.e. recently failed to produce matches with both teams scoring. Offensive metrics favor the home side: 2.89 SOT and 12% conversion versus 1.57 SOT and 5% conversion for the visitors, with similar xG 1.05 vs 1.04, suggesting CODM’s realistic ability to score is limited. Therefore I forecast BTTS - No (No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.10 goals for the home side and 0.60 for the visitors (total 1.70), which is clearly below the 2.5 line. Seasonal averages show FUS Rabat scores 1.0 and concedes 0.56 per match, while CODM Meknès scores 0.43 and concedes 1.0; xG for both teams is similar (1.05 for FUS and 1.04 for CODM). The strongest argument for Under 2.5 is the seasonal percentages: 89% of FUS matches and 71% of CODM matches finish below 2.5 goals, with FUS keeping 67% clean sheets and low BTTS rates of 22%/29%. In the last 5 matches FUS scored 8 goals (1.6 per game) and has last5 xG_for 1.45, which increases the overs risk, but the seasonal indicators (89%/71% under2.5) and the projected 1.70 goals give a clear edge to the Under 2.5 option, hence that line is my pick (I estimate its probability at ~84%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FUS Rabat is the clear favorite: they have a 67% win rate and average 1.0 goals scored per match versus 0.43 for CODM, with an average of 0.56 conceded for the home side vs 1.0 for the visitors. Both teams rarely score before half-time — the hosts are level at the break in 78% of matches, the visitors in 71%, and first-half goals average only 0.44 (FUS) and 0.43 (CODM). In the second half FUS is markedly stronger: they score an average of 0.78 goals after the break, record more than 0.5 goals in 89% of 2H matches and win 56% of second halves, while CODM in 2H score on average 0.29 and win only 14%. xG is similar (1.05 vs 1.04), but the hosts have more shots on target (2.89 vs 1.57) and better conversion (12% vs 5%), which supports a turnaround after half-time. Therefore I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the break and a FUS victory at full-time (X/1) as the most likely, assigning it roughly a 50% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FUS Rabat | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FUS Rabat is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.4 pts / match - CODM Meknès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FUS Rabat is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 0.75 goals / match - CODM Meknès
CODM Meknès is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 0.75 goals / match - CODM Meknès
FUS Rabat scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 matches).
CODM Meknès scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FUS Rabat
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FUS Rabat is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.13 pts / match - CODM Meknès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FUS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FUS Rabat
CODM Meknès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FUS Rabat | Liga | CODM Meknès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.69 | 2.14 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 48% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 37% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 32% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 59% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 74% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FUS Rabat 0 - 0 - 1 CODM Meknès. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
The Botola Pro match finished FUS Rabat 1:0 CODM Meknès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
FUS Rabat score 1.19 goals per game on average and CODM Meknès 0.75. The Botola Pro average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FUS Rabat's matches and 25% of CODM Meknès's.
What form are FUS Rabat and CODM Meknès in?
Over the last 5 games FUS Rabat have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and CODM Meknès 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FUS Rabat vs CODM Meknès?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


