Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 23 July 2026

FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

FUS Rabat crest
FUS Rabat
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger

FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FUS Rabat play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FUS Rabat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

FUS Rabat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FUS Rabat 53%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: FUS Rabat 30%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

FUS Rabat has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.30. FUS Rabat: 10.3 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.

Match halves

FUS Rabat: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.50. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

FUS Rabat: 31-45+ (9 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back a home win: FUS Rabat have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches versus Ittihad Tanger’s 4 in the same period. At home FUS average 1.25 goals per game with an average xG of 1.41, while the visitors average only 0.89 goals and xG 1.36 on the road, indicating the hosts create and convert slightly better chances. FUS register 4.13 shots on target per match with a conversion rate of 12%, compared to Ittihad’s 3.56 shots on target and 8% conversion, so the attacking quality edge is measurable. Defensively FUS concede 1.13 goals per home match with a 25% clean sheet rate, whereas Ittihad concede 1.33 goals away, have 0% clean sheets and fail to score in 44% of away games, which facilitates the hosts’ game management. Considering form (2.4 points per match for FUS in the last 5 vs 1.2 for Ittihad) and home win rate 50% vs visitors’ 22% away win rate, I estimate probabilities: home 62%, draw 22%, away 16%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
15Shots7
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
5Shots on target1
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.87xG0.81
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
5Corners1
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
79Dangerous attacks40
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
16Fouls13
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
2Cards3
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.03Goals scored / match0.9
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.2Goals conceded / match1.03
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
50%Average possession49%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
3.67Shots on target / match3.27
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.27Shots per match10.4
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
3.67Shots on target3.27
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
10.1%Shot conversion8.7%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
50%Possession49%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.34xG for1.3
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.31xG against1.48
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

FUS Rabat: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

FUS Rabat
LLWDL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FUS Rabat is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

FUS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

FUS Rabat scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

31Goals scored (season)27
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
36Goals conceded (season)31
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
2.23Average goals in match1.93
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
3Goals scored (last 5)4
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
27%2 goals23%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
10%3 goals0%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
27%2 goals20%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%3 goals3%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%4 goals0%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time10%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
3%BTTS in both halves0%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
27%Scored in both halves10%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
40%BTTS - last 540%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FUS Rabat is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

FUS Rabat - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.07
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.33
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.1Average goals (1st half)0.83
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
53%Clean sheet before half-time57%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
53%No goal before half-time70%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.37
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.1
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger
53%No goal after half-time53%
FUS RabatIttihad Tanger

FUS Rabat - second-half results

23% W43% R33% P
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FUS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FUS Rabat
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
9
9
31-45
2
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FUS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

FUS RabatLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 2.232.17 1.93
Both teams scored 53%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%38% 27%
Clean sheets 20%30% 20%
Goal before half-time 73%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 70%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FUS Rabat 1 - 0 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ittihad Tanger
0 : 3
FUS Rabat

FAQ

What was the result of FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished FUS Rabat 1:1 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

FUS Rabat score 1.03 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of FUS Rabat's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are FUS Rabat and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games FUS Rabat have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger?

The statistical background for FUS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.