FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: match statistics
FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FUS Rabat played RSB Berkane in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
FUS Rabat: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. RSB Berkane: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
FUS Rabat scores 1.04 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. RSB Berkane scores 1.37 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FUS Rabat 52%, RSB Berkane 52%. Over 2.5: FUS Rabat 30%, RSB Berkane 41%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
RSB Berkane has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.39. FUS Rabat: 10.7 shots per match, RSB Berkane: 10.9.
Match halves
FUS Rabat: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.52. RSB Berkane: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
FUS Rabat: 76-90+ (8 goals). RSB Berkane: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RSB Berkane are favorites on paper: they sit 4th with 13 wins and a goal difference of 37:25, while FUS Rabat are 9th with 8 wins and a 28:33 record. In their last five matches RSB have scored 5 goals, collected 2 wins and average 1.6 points per game, whereas FUS have scored 3 goals, won only once and average 1.0 point per game. The visitors’ defense looks more compact — RSB concede 0.85 goals per away match versus 1.08 conceded by FUS at home, and clean sheets for the away side occur in 31% of trips compared to 23% for hosts. However, the hosts create better chances: FUS record 1.52 xG and 4.23 shots on target per home match, while RSB away post 1.22 xG and 2.69 shots on target; FUS’s issue is poorer finishing — only 1.00 goal at home with around 9% conversion, versus 1.15 goals and 11% conversion for the visitors. Considering RSB’s higher efficiency and superior defensive numbers (fewer goals conceded and more wins this season), I predict a narrow victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates a slight edge for the "both teams to score" scenario — season BTTS rates are 57% for FUS Rabat and 46% for RSB Berkane versus a league average of 50%. A strong signal is that clean-sheet rates are 14% for the home side and 31% for the away side, meaning FUS scores in ~86% of matches and Berkane in ~69%; the product yields roughly a 59% chance both teams score. Additionally, FUS posts higher xG (1.65) and more SOT (4.5) than Berkane (xG 1.22, SOT 2.69), and Berkane’s average xG against is 1.37 — this favors goals from the hosts and a response from the visitors. The counterargument is form: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 40% for both teams, and FUS scored 3 and conceded 6 (0.6 and 1.2 per match) in that period, which slightly undermines the reliability of long-term signals. Considering the 86%×69% ≈59% estimate from clean-sheet rates, the home season BTTS of 57% and FUS’s xG and SOT advantage, I recommend 'BTTS - Yes' with a probability of 60% (No 40%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and seasonal numbers point to a match with an elevated number of scoring opportunities: FUS Rabat has xG_for 1.65, while RSB Berkane as the away team concedes xG 1.37, yielding ~1.51 expected goals for the home side; RSB has xG_for 1.22, and the hosts concede xG 1.18, giving about 1.20 for the visitors, total expected goals = 2.71. Using a Poisson model with λ=2.71 the probability of Over 1.5 is roughly 75% (1 - P(0 or 1) ≈ 0.75), Over 2.5 about 51% (1 - P(≤2) ≈ 0.51), and Over 3.5 about 29%. Additionally, FUS registers more on-target shots (4.5 vs 2.69) and has a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%), and seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 64% of home matches and 54% of away matches, which supports the Over 1.5 scenario. However, one must account for FUS’s recent inefficiency in the last 5 games (3 goals, 0.6 avg), despite a recent xG of 1.75, suggesting a lack of finishing rather than a lack of chances. Therefore the strongest signal is betting Over 1.5 (line 1.5) — it has about a 75% probability and the highest confidence margin among the analyzed lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the home side record draws at half-time in 57% of matches and the away side in 54% (average ~55%), which strongly favors a score of X at 45 minutes. After the break the home team predominates — they score on average 1.57 goals per match versus 1.15 for the visitors, generate 1.65 xG compared to 1.22 for opponents and register 4.5 shots on target per match versus 2.69, all of which increases their chances of a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the home side score on average 1.36 goals in the second half and notch 6 goals in the 61–75 minute window, while visitors concede 6 goals in minutes 76–90, which favors a home victory after the break. Taking into account the homes’ 57% win rate this season versus 38% for the away teams, the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FUS Rabat | RSB Berkane | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RSB Berkane is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.6 pts / match - RSB Berkane
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RSB Berkane is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 1.37 goals / match - RSB Berkane
RSB Berkane is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.22 goals / match - FUS Rabat · 0.93 goals / match - RSB Berkane
FUS Rabat scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
RSB Berkane scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FUS Rabat
Over / Under - RSB Berkane
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RSB Berkane is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - FUS Rabat · 1.67 pts / match - RSB Berkane
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FUS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RSB Berkane - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FUS Rabat
RSB Berkane
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| FUS Rabat | Liga | RSB Berkane | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.26 | 2.13 | ▲ 2.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 38% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 61% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 72% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: FUS Rabat 0 - 0 - 1 RSB Berkane. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?
The Botola Pro match finished FUS Rabat 2:1 RSB Berkane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?
FUS Rabat score 1.04 goals per game on average and RSB Berkane 1.37. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 52% of FUS Rabat's matches and 52% of RSB Berkane's.
What form are FUS Rabat and RSB Berkane in?
Over the last 5 games FUS Rabat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RSB Berkane 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?
The statistical background for FUS Rabat vs RSB Berkane — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


