Gandzasar vs Van: match statistics
Gandzasar vs Van: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gandzasar played Van in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Gandzasar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Van: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gandzasar scores 0.82 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Van scores 1.04 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gandzasar 41%, Van 57%. Over 2.5: Gandzasar 32%, Van 61%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Gandzasar has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.14. Gandzasar: 11.4 shots per match, Van: 10.1.
Match halves
Gandzasar: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.32. Van: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Gandzasar: 0-15 (4 goals). Van: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gandzasar holds a clear advantage in recent form and efficiency: in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while Van has scored only 4 goals and averages 0.6 points per game. At home Gandzasar averages 11.73 shots and 4.09 on target per match with a conversion rate of around 9%, whereas Van away averages 9.82 shots, 2.82 on target and a conversion of about 7%, indicating higher quality of attacking situations for the hosts. Defensively the hosts also perform better: Gandzasar concedes 1.09 goals on average at home, while Van concedes 1.73 on the road; the visitors fail to score in 55% of away matches, whereas the hosts are held goalless in only 36% of home games. xG confirms a moderate advantage for the hosts — 1.37 xG for Gandzasar at home versus 1.13 xG for Van away — and Van’s lower number of shots on target (2.82) and high away loss rate (64%) limit their chances. Considering the higher PPG (1.4 vs 0.6), more goals in the last 5 matches (8 vs 4) and Van’s high away loss percentage (64%), I predict a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes scenario appears more likely because Gandzasar has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, with goals scored average 1.33 for the season and 1.6 in the last 5. Van have a seasonal BTTS of 36% but improved to 60% in the last 5; however Van average only 0.73 goals in the season (0.8 in the last 5) and failed to score in 55% of season matches, which reduces confidence. xG indicates similar attacking strength: xG_for 1.16 for Gandzasar vs 1.13 for Van, and xG_against 1.5 vs 1.58, meaning both teams create chances and have defensive gaps. Additionally Gandzasar have higher shot conversion 13% vs 7% for Van and 75% of matches over 2.5 goals (Van 45%), while clean sheets occur in only 17% and 18% of matches, all of which points to backing BTTS - Yes (70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The sum of expected goals by xG is around 2.29 (1.16 xG for Gandzasar vs 1.13 xG for Van), placing the match just below the 2.5 line. Gandzasar scores on average 1.33 goals per game and concedes 1.5, while Van away scores 0.73 and concedes 1.73, so the hosts’ offensive edge and the visitors’ defensive issues increase the risk of goals. Home stats confirm this: for Gandzasar 83% of matches ended Over 1.5 and 75% Over 2.5, and in the last 5 home games the hosts averaged 1.68 xG with Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Van have a low shot conversion (7% vs 13% for the hosts) and only 0.77 xG in their last 5 matches, so they don’t generate many goals themselves; however the visitors’ high concession rate (1.73) and the fact that both teams scored at Gandzasar in 75% of matches favor a combined goals outcome. As a result, the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5 — combining 2.29 xG, the high Over 1.5 share for the hosts (83%) and 75% both-teams-to-score at Gandzasar, the probability of exceeding 1.5 goals is highest.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-Time statistics analysis indicates hosts are level at the break in 58% of matches, scoring an average of 0.50 goals in the first half versus just 0.09 for the visitors; visitors have not led at half-time in any match (leadingAtHT_away=0%). Additionally, hosts keep a clean sheet at half-time in 50% of cases (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=50%), while visitors are trailing at half-time in 73% of matches (trailingAtHTPercentage_away=73%). After the break hosts display stronger metrics — average second-half goals for hosts are 1.75 versus 1.18 for visitors (AVG_2hg_home=1.75 vs AVG_2hg_away=1.18) and a better shot conversion rate 13% versus 7% (shot_conversion_rate_home=13 vs shot_conversion_rate_away=7), which favors comebacks and goal scoring after half-time. Considering hosts win 33% of matches while visitors lose 64% (winPercentage_home=33; losePercentage_away=64), I estimate the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) at approximately 32%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gandzasar | Van | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gandzasar is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Gandzasar · 0.6 pts / match - Van
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Van is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
0.82 goals / match - Gandzasar · 1.04 goals / match - Van
Gandzasar is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Gandzasar · 1.61 goals / match - Van
Gandzasar scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Van keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
Van scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Gandzasar keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gandzasar
Over / Under - Van
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gandzasar is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / match - Gandzasar · 0.7 pts / match - Van
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gandzasar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Van - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gandzasar
Van
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Gandzasar | Liga | Van | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.18 | 2.57 | • 2.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 49% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- GandzasarYellow cardJerzino Ntolo Nchoutmboube
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Gandzasar 1 - 0 - 1 Van. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gandzasar vs Van?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Gandzasar 0:1 Van. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gandzasar and Van?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Gandzasar won 1, Van won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gandzasar vs Van?
Gandzasar score 0.82 goals per game on average and Van 1.04. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Gandzasar's matches and 57% of Van's.
What form are Gandzasar and Van in?
Over the last 5 games Gandzasar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Van 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gandzasar vs Van?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gandzasar vs Van: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


