Gangwon vs Gwangju: match statistics
Gangwon vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gangwon played Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Gangwon: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Gwangju: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gangwon scores 0.60 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Gwangju scores 0.80 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gangwon 60%, Gwangju 40%. Over 2.5: Gangwon 20%, Gwangju 40%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Gangwon has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.16. Gangwon: 11.8 shots per match, Gwangju: 9.4.
Match halves
Gangwon: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40. Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Gangwon: 76-90+ (2 goals). Gwangju: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a draw between Gangwon and Gwangju, as both teams frequently share points. Gangwon at home averages 15 shots and 4.5 on target with an xG of 1.97 and on average 1.00 goals scored, while Gwangju away averages 11.67 shots (3 on target), has an xG of 1.29 but only 0.33 goals scored and fails to score in 67% of away matches. The home defense looks better in terms of expected chances and concessions — hosts concede 1.00 goal at home on average with an xG against of 0.81, whereas visitors concede 2.00 goals on average away with an xG against of 1.4. Additionally, the hosts have 67% possession versus 55% for their opponents, more goal-scoring opportunities and higher shot efficiency (around 7% vs 3%), but Gangwon have yet to win at home (0% wins, 100% draws), and Gwangju also have no away wins (0%). Taking into account the hosts’ advantage in chances and xG but the strong draw tendency of both teams, I assess the probabilities as: home 35%, draw 50%, away 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS - Yes comes from Gwangju: they average only 0.33 goals per match and fail to score in 67% of games, which markedly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Gangwon at home scores 1.5 goals per match and keeps clean sheets in 50% of games, meaning hosts frequently finish matches with a clean sheet expected. Gwangju attempt more shots (11.67 vs 6.0) but with only 3% finishing this yields ~0.35 goals (11.67·0.03≈0.35), whereas Gangwon with 6 shots and 25% conversion gives ~1.5 goals, which aligns with seasonal figures. Although xG indicates Gwangju creates chances (xG 1.29 away) and the league has a high BTTS rate of 62%, the divergence between xG and actual finishing (Gwangju’s low conversion and high share of no-goal matches) limits the probability of both teams scoring. Therefore I assess BTTS at 30% Yes / 70% No and pick 'No Goal' as the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 2.45 total goals in the match: 1.45 for Gangwon and 1.00 for Gwangju. Gangwon score on average 1.5 goals per home game and show a high shot conversion rate of 25% from roughly 6 shots (3.5 on target), while Gwangju concede on average 2.0 goals away, creating pressure for the hosts. xG metrics paint a mixed picture: xG_for Gangwon is 0.97 versus xG_against Gwangju 1.40 (adjusting the hosts toward ~1.45), and xG_for Gwangju 1.29 versus xG_against Gangwon 2.18 indicate an away scoring potential that is, however, suppressed by Gwangju’s low conversion rate of 3% and seasonal 0.33 goals per away match. The total ~2.45 sits closer to the 2.5 threshold than 1.5, but given Gangwon have had Over 1.5 in 50% of their matches this season and Gwangju in 67%, the strongest signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 is less convincing (~45% chance), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~15%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time: Gangwon has been level at the break in 100% of their matches, and Gwangju in 67%, so HT/FT outcomes starting with a draw are favored. After the break I expect the home side to take the lead and win: the season average goals scored is 1.5 for Gangwon versus 0.33 for Gwangju, and points per game are 2.0 vs 0.67, which strongly supports the hosts. Second-half statistics confirm this scenario — the hosts score on average 1.0 goals after the break, while Gwangju concedes an average of 1.67 goals in the second half and notably concedes in the 46–60 and 76–90 minute intervals (2 goals in each), which favors a turnaround in Gangwon’s favor. The difference in finishing is clear: the home side’s shot conversion rate is 25% with an average of 6.0 shots per match, whereas the visitors have a 3% conversion on 11.67 shots, so Gwangju’s greater volume of chances does not translate into goals. For these reasons I back X/1 (draw at half-time, Gangwon win after 90 minutes) as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gangwon | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gwangju is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Gangwon · 1.2 pts / match - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gwangju is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
0.6 goals / match - Gangwon · 0.8 goals / match - Gwangju
Gangwon is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Gangwon · 1.6 goals / match - Gwangju
Gangwon scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
Gwangju scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gangwon
Over / Under - Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gwangju is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / match - Gangwon · 0.8 pts / match - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gangwon - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gwangju - second-half results
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gangwon
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gangwon | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.80 | 2.10 | ▲ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 58% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 32% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 52% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 71% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Gangwon 3 - 0 - 0 Gwangju. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gangwon vs Gwangju?
The K League 1 match finished Gangwon 3:0 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gangwon and Gwangju?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gangwon won 3, Gwangju won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gangwon vs Gwangju?
Gangwon score 0.60 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.80. The K League 1 average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Gangwon's matches and 40% of Gwangju's.
What form are Gangwon and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Gangwon have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Gwangju 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gangwon vs Gwangju?
The statistical background for Gangwon vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


