Gangwon vs Pohang Steelers: match statistics
Gangwon vs Pohang Steelers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gangwon played Pohang Steelers in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 5 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Gangwon: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Pohang Steelers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gangwon scores 1.27 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Pohang Steelers scores 0.73 and concedes 0.82. League average: 2.38 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gangwon 45%, Pohang Steelers 27%. Over 2.5: Gangwon 36%, Pohang Steelers 9%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Gangwon has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.43. Gangwon: 13.2 shots per match, Pohang Steelers: 11.6.
Match halves
Gangwon: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64. Pohang Steelers: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Gangwon: 76-90+ (5 goals). Pohang Steelers: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.38 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-2. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Gangwon’s home xG is 1.98 versus Pohang’s away xG of 1.34, indicating higher quality in chance creation. The hosts average 15.4 shots and 5.2 on target per home match, compared to visitors’ 10.67 shots and 3 on target; in the last five matches Gangwon scored 8 and conceded 3, while Pohang scored 4 and conceded 6. Form also favors Gangwon — the hosts collected 10 points in their last five (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), averaging 2.0 points per match, whereas Pohang has 6 points (2 wins, 3 losses), averaging 1.2 points per match. Defensively Gangwon concedes 1.0 goal at home with an opposing xG of 0.92, while Pohang concedes 1.33 goals away with an opposing xG of 1.64. However, a high share of home draws (60% draws at home with 20% home wins) and Pohang’s superior conversion rate (13% vs 9%) increase the probability of a stalemate; therefore the proposed outcome is weighted accordingly.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario is more likely because visitors Pohang have a season BTTS of 67% and average 1.33 goals per away match. Hosts Gangwon, despite a low home goals average of 0.50 and a low shot conversion rate of 4%, generate xG 1.45 per match, and in the last 5 games had xG 1.63 and scored 8 goals (1.6 per match), indicating an offensive improvement. Pohang’s defense looks vulnerable — xG against 1.64 and average goals conceded 1.33 per match — so statistically there is a risk of conceding. Against that stands Gangwon’s high rate of clean sheets at home 50% and the hosts’ season BTTS of only 13%, which reduces the likelihood of BTTS, but the league average BTTS is 52% and recent results show an uptick in the hosts’ scoring. Considering the combination of Pohang’s 67%, Gangwon’s xG 1.45–1.63 and Pohang’s xG against 1.64, I estimate BTTS at 65% for 'Yes' (Goal/Goal) and 35% for 'No' (clean sheet expected/No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.54 goals for Gangwon (attacking xG 1.45 vs Pohang’s defensive xG 1.64) and 1.21 for Pohang (attacking xG 1.34 vs Gangwon’s defensive xG 1.08), totaling ~2.75 goals. The expected goals sum of 2.75 is clearly above 1.5 and slightly above 2.5 (by 0.25), and in the last 5 matches the combined xG was 3.09 (1.63+1.46), which further supports a scenario of at least two goals. Pohang shows high efficiency — a conversion rate of 13.0% with an average of 10.67 shots yields roughly 1.39 goals from their side, while Gangwon has a large negative differential: xG 1.45 vs actual 0.5 goals (difference 0.95), suggesting potential for improved finishing and more goals. Season metrics are mixed: Gangwon has 0% matches over 2.5, but only 25% over 1.5, whereas Pohang has 33% over 2.5 and 67% over 1.5; historically this favors the under for Gangwon, but recent form and xG favor the over. Considering the 2.75 expected goals, the 3.09 combined xG in the last 5 matches and Pohang’s high conversion, the strongest and most probable signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Gangwon leading at half-time and winning) because the strongest signal is the home side’s lead at the break and their form: in the last five matches Gangwon led at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and collected 9 points at the break versus 1 point for Pohang (average 1.13 pts vs 0.33). Offensively the hosts have averaged 1.6 goals per match over the last five compared to 0.8 for the visitors, and generated xG of 1.45 vs 1.34, indicating they create more chances. Gangwon’s defence also looks more stable: over the last five they concede 0.6 goals on average vs 1.2 for Pohang, with xG against 1.08 vs 1.64, which increases the likelihood of holding a lead. There is, however, a risk of a Pohang turnaround — the visitors have better shot conversion (13% vs 4%) and seasonally strong second-half entries (visitors’ second-half goals: over0.5 in 100%, 3 of 3) — but the last five matches show the hosts finish games better (second-half points: Gangwon 2.2 vs Pohang 1.2), so 1/1 appears the strongest scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gangwon | Pohang Steelers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gangwon is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Gangwon · 1.2 pts / match - Pohang Steelers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gangwon is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Gangwon · 0.73 goals / match - Pohang Steelers
Gangwon scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Pohang Steelers keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).
Pohang Steelers scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gangwon
Over / Under - Pohang Steelers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gangwon is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Gangwon · 0.91 pts / match - Pohang Steelers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gangwon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pohang Steelers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gangwon
Pohang Steelers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gangwon | Liga | Pohang Steelers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.09 | 2.38 | ▼ 1.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 50% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 38% | ▼ 9% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 29% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 66% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Gangwon 3 - 0 - 2 Pohang Steelers. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gangwon vs Pohang Steelers?
The K League 1 match finished Gangwon 1:1 Pohang Steelers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gangwon and Pohang Steelers?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Gangwon won 3, Pohang Steelers won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gangwon vs Pohang Steelers?
Gangwon score 1.27 goals per game on average and Pohang Steelers 0.73. The K League 1 average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Gangwon's matches and 27% of Pohang Steelers's.
What form are Gangwon and Pohang Steelers in?
Over the last 5 games Gangwon have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pohang Steelers 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gangwon vs Pohang Steelers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


