Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa: match statistics
Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Garudayaksa FC played Adhyaksa in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Garudayaksa FC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Adhyaksa: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Garudayaksa FC scores 1.82 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Adhyaksa scores 2.45 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Garudayaksa FC 45%, Adhyaksa 68%. Over 2.5: Garudayaksa FC 36%, Adhyaksa 55%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Adhyaksa has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.61. Garudayaksa FC: 10.9 shots per match, Adhyaksa: 12.3.
Match halves
Garudayaksa FC: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.95. Adhyaksa: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Garudayaksa FC: 16-30 (9 goals). Adhyaksa: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 2: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Adhyaksa sits 1st in the table and has scored 24 goals in the last 5 matches (4.8 per match) while averaging 2.6 points per game, whereas Garudayaksa is 2nd and scored 6 goals in those 5 games (1.2 per match) with 1.6 points per match. At home Garudayaksa averages 2.73 goals scored and concedes only 0.91 goals per match, registers 6.73 shots on target from 14.36 attempts, has a conversion rate of 19% and wins 64% of home matches, indicating high efficiency in front of their fans. Adhyaksa away averages 1.4 goals and 1.1 conceded per match, 5.11 shots on target from 9.56 attempts and a 13% conversion, so they create fewer chances and are less clinical than the hosts at home. Quality-of-chance metrics show home xG 1.80 versus away xG 1.33, yet Adhyaksa still has more goals this season (54 vs 40) and a better recent form (4 wins and 1 draw). Considering the guests’ recent attacking dynamics (24 goals in 5 matches) and the fact that the hosts fail to score in only 9% of home games, I project a narrow victory for Adhyaksa, although I expect a closely contested match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics strongly favor BTTS: the home side has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and the away side 60%, which is a strong signal for both teams to score. The home team averages 3.33 goals per game with xG 1.89 on 15.42 shots and 6.25 on target, while the away team averages 1.4 goals and xG 1.33 on 9.56 shots and 5.11 on target; the home side is more efficient (22% vs 13%). Defensively, the home team concedes 1.25 goals seasonally and the away team 1.1, and the chance of a clean sheet is low: only 17% for the home side and 20% for the away side, which increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. The last 5 matches give a mixed signal: the home side have BTTS in only 20% recently and average 1.2 goals, but the away side have BTTS 80% recently and average 4.8 goals, so at least the away team is in clear attacking form. Considering the seasonal 75%/60%, low clean sheet percentages of 17%/20%, xG 1.89 vs 1.33 and recent form, I assign BTTS 72% vs 28% and recommend the 'yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Garudayaksa has a very high scoring potential: averaging 3.33 goals at home with xG 1.89, 15.42 shots and a 22% conversion rate (which implies ~3.39 goals by simple multiplication), while Adhyaksa records 1.4 goals away with xG 1.33, 9.56 shots and 13% conversion (~1.24). Both teams frequently see BTTS (75% for the home side, 60% for the visitors) and seasonal Over1.5 rates are 92% for the home team and 80% for the away team, which already suggests at least 2 goals in the match. A blended estimate accounting for xG, recent form and conversion yields a forecast of 2.07 goals for the home team and 1.54 for the away team (total 3.61). With lambda=3.61, the Poisson distribution gives roughly an 88% chance of Over1.5, ~70% for Over2.5 and ~49% for Over3.5; therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Garudayaksa leads at the break in 58% of matches and scores on average 1.75 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.58, whereas Adhyaksa averages 0.6 goals before the break — a strong signal for the home lead. Over the full match the hosts score on average 3.33 goals versus 1.4 for the visitors, have xG of 1.89 against 1.33 and a higher shot conversion rate (22% vs 13%), which increases the likelihood of maintaining the advantage. After the break the hosts score on average 1.58 goals and concede 0.67, and 83% of their matches see at least one goal in the second half, so the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of leading at the break and winning at full-time has the strongest data support (hence 45% for 1/1). The away side have a good run in their last 5 games (80% wins), which justifies some risk of a turnaround (e.g. X/1 12% or 2/2 7%), but seasonal Half-Time metrics and xG favour the hosts as the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Garudayaksa FC | Adhyaksa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Adhyaksa is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Garudayaksa FC · 2.6 pts / match - Adhyaksa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Adhyaksa is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.82 goals / match - Garudayaksa FC · 2.45 goals / match - Adhyaksa
Garudayaksa FC is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - Garudayaksa FC · 1.18 goals / match - Adhyaksa
Garudayaksa FC scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Adhyaksa keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
Adhyaksa scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Garudayaksa FC keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Garudayaksa FC
Over / Under - Adhyaksa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Garudayaksa FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Adhyaksa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 2.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Garudayaksa FC
Adhyaksa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Garudayaksa FC | Liga | Adhyaksa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.55 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 49% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 48% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 30% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▲ 91% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Garudayaksa FC 1 - 0 - 1 Adhyaksa. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa?
The Liga 2 match finished Garudayaksa FC 0:0 Adhyaksa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Garudayaksa FC and Adhyaksa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Garudayaksa FC won 1, Adhyaksa won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa?
Garudayaksa FC score 1.82 goals per game on average and Adhyaksa 2.45. The Liga 2 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Garudayaksa FC's matches and 68% of Adhyaksa's.
What form are Garudayaksa FC and Adhyaksa in?
Over the last 5 games Garudayaksa FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Adhyaksa 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa?
The statistical background for Garudayaksa FC vs Adhyaksa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


