Gateshead vs Wealdstone: match statistics
Wealdstone is the clear favorite in this matchup. Gateshead occupies a very low 23rd position in the table with a disastrous record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and 21 defeats this season. The hosts have a dreadful home record - only an 11% win rate, a 67% loss rate, and a goal difference of -22. Additionally, they failed to score in 44% of their home matches. In contrast, Wealdstone shows much better form, especially in their last five matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 defeat), scoring an impressive 15 goals. The visitors boast better xG stats (1.52 vs 1.57 for the hosts), higher shooting efficiency (11% vs 8%), and a superior average of away goals scored (1.28 vs 0.94 for the hosts at home). The qualitative and form advantage points towards a Wealdstone win, although the visitors' instability on the road (50% loss rate) and the similar average ball possession of both teams (55-56%) mean a draw cannot be ruled out.
Gateshead vs Wealdstone: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gateshead played Wealdstone in National League (England). The match was played on 17 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Gateshead: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Wealdstone: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gateshead scores 1.19 and concedes 2.14 goals per match. Wealdstone scores 1.47 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gateshead 57%, Wealdstone 61%. Over 2.5: Gateshead 68%, Wealdstone 58%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Wealdstone has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.42. Gateshead: 10.7 shots per match, Wealdstone: 12.8.
Match halves
Gateshead: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.57. Wealdstone: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Gateshead: 0-15 (10 goals). Wealdstone: 61-75 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wealdstone is the clear favorite in this matchup. Gateshead occupies a very low 23rd position in the table with a disastrous record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and 21 defeats this season. The hosts have a dreadful home record - only an 11% win rate, a 67% loss rate, and a goal difference of -22. Additionally, they failed to score in 44% of their home matches. In contrast, Wealdstone shows much better form, especially in their last five matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 defeat), scoring an impressive 15 goals. The visitors boast better xG stats (1.52 vs 1.57 for the hosts), higher shooting efficiency (11% vs 8%), and a superior average of away goals scored (1.28 vs 0.94 for the hosts at home). The qualitative and form advantage points towards a Wealdstone win, although the visitors' instability on the road (50% loss rate) and the similar average ball possession of both teams (55-56%) mean a draw cannot be ruled out.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gateshead | Wealdstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wealdstone is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Gateshead · 2.4 pts / match - Wealdstone
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wealdstone is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Gateshead · 1.47 goals / match - Wealdstone
Wealdstone is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.14 goals / match - Gateshead · 1.67 goals / match - Wealdstone
Gateshead scores in 62% of matches (23 of 37 matches), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).
Wealdstone scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Gateshead keeps a clean sheet in 8% (3 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gateshead
Over / Under - Wealdstone
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wealdstone is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Gateshead · 0.92 pts / match - Wealdstone
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gateshead - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wealdstone - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gateshead
Wealdstone
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Gateshead | Liga | Wealdstone | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.32 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 58% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 57% | • 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 23% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 72% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Gateshead 0 - 1 - 0 Wealdstone. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gateshead vs Wealdstone?
The National League match finished Gateshead 1:0 Wealdstone. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gateshead vs Wealdstone?
Gateshead score 1.19 goals per game on average and Wealdstone 1.47. The National League average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Gateshead's matches and 61% of Wealdstone's.
What form are Gateshead and Wealdstone in?
Over the last 5 games Gateshead have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wealdstone 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gateshead vs Wealdstone?
The statistical background for Gateshead vs Wealdstone — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.