Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraCCM Kirumba StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

Geita Gold vs Azam: match statistics

Geita Gold crest
Geita Gold
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Azam crest
Azam

Geita Gold vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Geita Gold played Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Geita Gold: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match. Azam: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Geita Gold scores 2.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Azam scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Geita Gold 33%, Azam 100%. Over 2.5: Geita Gold 33%, Azam 67%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Geita Gold has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.57. Geita Gold: 10.0 shots per match, Azam: 9.0.

Match halves

Geita Gold: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.00. Azam: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Geita Gold: 16-30 (2 goals). Azam: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam remain unbeaten in the league, recording 2 wins and a draw, while in their last five matches they have won 4 times and drawn just once. The visitors are also clearly more solid defensively: they have conceded 3 goals in their last five games, whereas Geita Gold have allowed 7 and lost 3 of those five fixtures. The hosts are very dangerous at home, where they average 6 goals from 16 shots and 9 shots on target per match, but they also concede an average of 2 goals, with opponents creating chances worth 2.96 xG against them. Azam generate just 0.84 xG away from home and average 1 goal, so the hosts have genuine arguments for finding the net. However, the visitors' superior current form and greater defensive consistency slightly favour an Azam win. The match is expected to be closely contested, but Azam's edge in recent results justifies backing outcome 2.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS at 100% across the teams’ matches to date, combined with the absence of clean sheets on either side, points to a clear tendency for both teams to score. Geita Gold average 2.0 goals at home, with an xG of 1.94 and 6.5 shots on target per match, while Azam’s defence concedes an average of 1.0 goal and allows 1.69 xG. Azam have a weaker season-long attacking profile, with an xG of just 0.84, but they have improved their recent average to 1.8 goals and 1.62 xG over their last five matches. During the same period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per match, while their xGA stood at 1.61, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. The latest BTTS figures—40% for Geita Gold and 60% for Azam—reduce confidence, but the hosts’ attacking edge and the visitors’ current scoring form support the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Geita Gold create chances worth an average of 1.94 xG at home and register 6.5 shots on target per match, while Azam concede as much as 1.69 xG away from home. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals, while Azam, despite a lower away xG of 0.84, average 1.0 goal, and both teams have scored in every match played so far. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 100% of both teams’ matches to date, clearly supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Caution regarding higher lines is warranted by the last five matches, in which each team recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of cases, while Azam conceded just 0.6 goals per game during that period. The projected 2.70 goals gives Over 1.5 the safest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Azam victory at the final whistle, as the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 80% of them and scoring an average of 1.8 goals. Azam were level at half-time in 60% of those fixtures, while conceding just 0.2 goals per match before the break, which points to a cautious opening. Geita Gold do have a home average xG of 1.94 and register an average of 6.5 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.0, but they have lost three of their last five outings and conceded an average of 1.4 goals. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 40% of their recent matches, whereas Azam have not been behind at the break in any of them. After half-time, the visitors score an average of 0.8 goals, and their current run of four wins in five matches further strengthens the likelihood of a turnaround in their favour in what could be an evenly balanced contest.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Geita GoldAzam
15Shots22
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target10
Geita GoldAzam
1.8xG2.93
Geita GoldAzam
1Corners9
Geita GoldAzam
81Dangerous attacks118
Geita GoldAzam
15Fouls10
Geita GoldAzam
0Cards0
Geita GoldAzam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.33Goals scored / match1.67
Geita GoldAzam
1Goals conceded / match1
Geita GoldAzam
51%Average possession54%
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target / match5.33
Geita GoldAzam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match9
Geita GoldAzam
4Shots on target5.33
Geita GoldAzam
23.3%Shot conversion18.5%
Geita GoldAzam
51%Possession54%
Geita GoldAzam
1.64xG for1.57
Geita GoldAzam
1.73xG against1.42
Geita GoldAzam

Shooting quality

Geita Gold: Efficient finishingAzam: Efficient finishing
Geita GoldAzam
Accuracy (shots on target)40%59%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.580.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Geita Gold · 2.33 pts / match - Azam

Geita Gold
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Azam
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Geita Gold is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

2.33 goals / match - Geita Gold · 1.67 goals / match - Azam

Geita Gold scoring profile: very strong

Geita Gold scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Geita Gold keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

7Goals scored (season)5
Geita GoldAzam
3Goals conceded (season)3
Geita GoldAzam
3.33Average goals in match2.67
Geita GoldAzam
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Geita GoldAzam
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
Geita GoldAzam

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%2 goals67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%3 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%4 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%2 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
0%3 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam
0%4 goals0%
Geita GoldAzam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
33%BTTS in both halves0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Scored in both halves33%
Geita GoldAzam

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Geita GoldAzam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Geita GoldAzam
33%BTTS - last 5100%
Geita GoldAzam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Geita GoldAzam

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Geita GoldAzam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Geita Gold is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Geita Gold · 1.67 pts / match - Azam

Geita Gold - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing
Azam - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.67
Geita GoldAzam
1.33Goals scored (1st half)1
Geita GoldAzam
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Geita GoldAzam
2Average goals (1st half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Geita GoldAzam
33%No goal before half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Geita GoldAzam
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Geita GoldAzam
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Geita GoldAzam
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam
67%No goal after half-time33%
Geita GoldAzam

Geita Gold - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Geita Gold - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.67
Goals scored / match1.31.0
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match2.01.3
1 goal100%33%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 4
Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.671.33
Goals scored / match1.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.30.7
Average goals in match1.31.3
1 goal67%100%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Geita Gold
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Geita Gold

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Geita GoldLigaAzam
Average goals in match 3.332.48 2.67
Both teams scored 33%52% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%41% 67%
Clean sheets 33%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 67%
Goal after half-time 33%74% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Geita Gold vs Azam?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Geita Gold 2:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Geita Gold vs Azam?

Geita Gold score 2.33 goals per game on average and Azam 1.67. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Geita Gold's matches and 100% of Azam's.

What form are Geita Gold and Azam in?

Over the last 5 games Geita Gold have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Azam 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Geita Gold vs Azam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.