Gençlerbirliği vs Amed: match statistics
Gençlerbirliği vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gençlerbirliği played Amed in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Eryaman Stadyumu. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Gençlerbirliği: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Amed: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gençlerbirliği scores 0.83 and concedes 2.17 goals per match. Amed scores 2.50 and concedes 1.17. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gençlerbirliği 50%, Amed 50%. Over 2.5: Gençlerbirliği 67%, Amed 83%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.25. Gençlerbirliği: 12.0 shots per match, Amed: 14.7.
Match halves
Gençlerbirliği: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Amed: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.83.
Goals by minute
Gençlerbirliği: 46-60 (2 goals). Amed: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Süper Lig: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed sit 1st and have won 4 of their 6 matches this season, while Gençlerbirliği are 14th with 2 wins. In their last five matches, the visitors have scored 12 goals and collected 10 points, compared with just 3 goals and 4 points for the hosts, who have conceded as many as 12 goals. However, Amed’s advantage is less pronounced away from home: they have failed to win either of their two away matches, averaging 1 goal scored and 2 conceded, while Gençlerbirliği have averaged 1.33 goals both scored and conceded at home. Chance quality also slightly favours the hosts in their home matches: their average xG is 1.43, compared with Amed’s 1.29 away from home. Despite these caveats, Amed’s clearly superior finishing and results in recent weeks point to an away win, although the risk of a draw remains significant.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Amed’s recent form supports both teams to score: the visitors have averaged 2.4 goals across their last five matches, while Gençlerbirliği have also conceded an average of 2.4 goals over that span. The hosts have managed just 0.6 goals per match in their last five, but their home average stands at 3.25, while Amed concede an average of 2.0 goals away from home. Average xG over the last five matches—1.31 for the hosts and 1.55 for the visitors—suggests that both sides are capable of creating chances. The risk of one team failing to score remains significant, as Amed have failed to score in 50% of their away matches, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home games. Even so, Gençlerbirliği’s recent defensive struggles and Amed’s away goals conceded give a slight edge to BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In Gençlerbirliği’s last 5 matches, an average of 3.0 goals were scored, compared with 3.8 in Amed’s matches; at least 3 goals were scored in 60% and 80% of those games, respectively. An open game is suggested in particular by the hosts’ defence, which conceded an average of 2.4 goals during this period, while Amed scored 2.4 goals per match. On the other hand, the hosts average 3.25 goals scored at home, while the visitors concede 2.0 goals away, although Gençlerbirliği’s recent dip in scoring efficiency calls for a more cautious forecast. The estimated total of 3.20 goals supports backing the goals market, but given the discrepancy between the home figures and recent form, Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Gençlerbirliği’s home advantage: the hosts have won all 4 home matches, scoring an average of 3.25 goals, while Amed have failed to win either of their 2 away matches and have conceded an average of 2 goals. The hosts are likely to lead at the break, having done so in 2 of their 4 home matches, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in both of their away games so far. After the break, Gençlerbirliği have scored an average of 2.25 goals at home, supporting the expectation that they will maintain or extend their lead. The hosts’ average xG of 1.64 compared with the visitors’ 1.29, as well as 6.5 shots on target per match versus 2.5, also support the 1/1 HT/FT pick. However, confidence is tempered by the teams’ overall form in their last 5 matches: Amed have won 3, while Gençlerbirliği have won just 1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gençlerbirliği | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Amed is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Gençlerbirliği · 2 pts / match - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 201% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Gençlerbirliği · 2.5 goals / match - Amed
Amed is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.17 goals / match - Gençlerbirliği · 1.17 goals / match - Amed
Gençlerbirliği scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
Amed scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Gençlerbirliği keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gençlerbirliği
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Gençlerbirliği · 1.33 pts / match - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gençlerbirliği - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gençlerbirliği
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Gençlerbirliği | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 3.00 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
The Süper Lig match finished Gençlerbirliği 2:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
Gençlerbirliği score 0.83 goals per game on average and Amed 2.50. The Süper Lig average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Gençlerbirliği's matches and 50% of Amed's.
What form are Gençlerbirliği and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Gençlerbirliği have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Amed 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gençlerbirliği vs Amed?
The statistical background for Gençlerbirliği vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.