General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary: match statistics
General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
General Caballero JLM played Tacuary in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 17 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Leandro Ovelar. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
General Caballero JLM: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Tacuary: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
General Caballero JLM scores 2.06 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Tacuary scores 1.22 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: General Caballero JLM 67%, Tacuary 61%. Over 2.5: General Caballero JLM 67%, Tacuary 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
General Caballero JLM has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.22. General Caballero JLM: 12.4 shots per match, Tacuary: 8.1.
Match halves
General Caballero JLM: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.06. Tacuary: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
General Caballero JLM: 76-90+ (13 goals). Tacuary: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
General Caballero JLM sit 2nd, while Tacuary are 14th, and the quality gap is further underlined by their season records: 11 home wins compared with just 3 victories for the visitors. The hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded only 3 goals during that run, whereas Tacuary have recorded 1 win, drawn three times and scored 5 goals in the same period. At home, General Caballero JLM win 78% of their matches, score an average of 2.56 goals and register 7.11 shots on target per game, compared with Tacuary’s 1.22 goals and 3.22 shots on target away from home. The hosts also create more high-quality chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.71 versus 1.09 for their opponents, while the visitors concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home. Tacuary draw as many as 56% of their away matches, so they may keep the margin of defeat under control, but the clear advantage in form, attacking output and home advantage points strongly towards a General Caballero JLM win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is supported by the seasonal profile of both teams: General Caballero have recorded this outcome in 56% of their matches, while Tacuary have done so in as many as 67%, compared with the league average of 56%. The hosts score an average of 1.22 goals, while Tacuary concede 1.67 per match, which clearly increases the home side’s chances of finding the net. The visitors have lower attacking potential, averaging 1.22 goals with an xG of 1.09, but General Caballero’s defence allows an average of 1.33 goals and opposition xG of 1.44. The hosts’ recent form has been defensively stronger, as they conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches and BTTS landed in 40% of cases. Therefore, the advantage for the “Yes” scenario is moderate rather than decisive. Nevertheless, Tacuary have scored in an average of one of their last five matches, while their BTTS rate over that period stands at 60%, making both teams to score the most probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
General Caballero averages 1.22 goals per match, improving to 1.60 across their last five games, while Tacuary conceded just 1.20 goals per match over the same period. The home side have been highly consistent defensively of late, conceding only 3 goals in total across five matches, or 0.60 per game. The combined xG averages of both teams point to approximately 2.44 goals, suggesting a scoreline in the two- or three-goal range rather than an open, high-scoring game with four goals. The Under 3.5 goals line is further supported by General Caballero’s data, with 67% of their matches ending with a maximum of three goals, while neither team averages even 1.3 goals per match. Therefore, Under 3.5 is the strongest pick, although the 2.5 line remains finely balanced.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
General Caballero JLM are in clearly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding just 0.6, while Tacuary have recorded only a 20% win rate. The hosts held a lead at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 0.8 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2; over the same period, the visitors conceded an average of 0.6 goals in the first half. Tacuary often go into the interval level, as occurred in 60% of their recent matches, but their full-season away figures show an average of only 1.22 goals scored and 1.67 conceded. General Caballero’s advantage is also reflected in their xG, standing at 1.35 compared with the opponents’ 1.09, as well as in their average of 3.89 shots on target per match versus 3.22. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts will take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, corresponding to an HT/FT 1/1 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| General Caballero JLM | Tacuary | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
General Caballero JLM is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - General Caballero JLM · 1.2 pts / match - Tacuary
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
General Caballero JLM is 69% better for: goals scored per match.
2.06 goals / match - General Caballero JLM · 1.22 goals / match - Tacuary
General Caballero JLM is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - General Caballero JLM · 1.5 goals / match - Tacuary
General Caballero JLM scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Tacuary keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
Tacuary scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while General Caballero JLM keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - General Caballero JLM
Over / Under - Tacuary
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
General Caballero JLM is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - General Caballero JLM · 1 pts / match - Tacuary
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
General Caballero JLM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tacuary - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
General Caballero JLM
Tacuary
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| General Caballero JLM | Liga | Tacuary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 26% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 67% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: General Caballero JLM 1 - 0 - 0 Tacuary. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary?
The Division Intermedia match finished General Caballero JLM 4:1 Tacuary. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary?
General Caballero JLM score 2.06 goals per game on average and Tacuary 1.22. The Division Intermedia average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 67% of General Caballero JLM's matches and 61% of Tacuary's.
What form are General Caballero JLM and Tacuary in?
Over the last 5 games General Caballero JLM have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tacuary 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for General Caballero JLM vs Tacuary: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


