Geylang International vs Balestier Khalsa: match statistics
Geylang International vs Balestier Khalsa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Geylang International played Balestier Khalsa in S.League (Singapore). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Geylang International: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Balestier Khalsa: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Geylang International scores 1.12 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Balestier Khalsa scores 1.76 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Geylang International 47%, Balestier Khalsa 65%. Over 2.5: Geylang International 59%, Balestier Khalsa 94%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 74%.
xG, shots and style
Balestier Khalsa has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.40. Geylang International: 12.1 shots per match, Balestier Khalsa: 13.4.
Match halves
Geylang International: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.53. Balestier Khalsa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Geylang International: 61-75 (5 goals). Balestier Khalsa: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
S.League: 3.61 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 74%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hosts Geylang International have scored 19 goals this season and average 0.89 goals per home match, registering 10.67 shots per game of which 3.56 are on target and exhibiting a low conversion rate of 8%. Visitors Balestier Khalsa are markedly more productive – 30 goals this season and 2.29 goals per away match, with 15.86 shots (6.57 on target), higher conversion at 14%, superior possession (52% vs 46%) and xG 1.94 versus the hosts' 1.31. In the last 5 matches both teams scored respectively 4 (Geylang) and 6 (Balestier) goals, both conceded 8 goals and recorded 3 wins each, yielding 1.8 points per game in that period. Balestier’s key advantage therefore stems from creating more chances and better conversion, despite similar defensive vulnerability (Geylang concedes 1.78 goals at home vs Balestier 1.86 away). Considering these figures and the fact Balestier have a 57% away win rate versus Geylang’s 33% home win rate and a positive goal difference +3 compared to the hosts’ -8, I tip the visitors to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly favor BTTS: Geylang concedes an average of 2.6 goals per game (29 conceded this season), while Balestier scores an average of 2.29 goals (30 scored), indicating the away side regularly finds the net. xG and shooting data confirm chances will be created — Balestier has xG 1.94 with 6.57 on-target shots and 15.86 shots per game, whereas Geylang allows 2.33 xG and averages 4.1 on-target with 11.7 shots; conversion is around 14% for Balestier and 12% for Geylang. Season BTTS rates are 50% for Geylang and 86% for Balestier, hosts have 0% clean sheets at home, and Geylang’s home matches have finished over 2.5 goals 100% of the time, all strongly supporting a both teams to score scenario. Despite lower recent BTTS in the last 5 matches (20% for hosts, 40% for visitors), the away side’s xG advantage (1.94) and Geylang’s very high average goals conceded (2.6) lead me to pick BTTS - Yes with high confidence.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and seasonal figures point to strong goal potential: home xG is 1.36 versus away defensive xG 1.86, yielding ~1.61 expected goals for Geylang; away xG is 1.94 against home defense xG 2.33, implying ~2.14 goals for Balestier, totaling ~3.75 goals. Seasonal stats reinforce this exposure — both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, with over 2.5 rates at 100% for the home side and 86% for the away side; the league average is 3.61 goals per match. The hosts concede 2.6 goals per game on average while the visitors score 2.29, further increasing the likelihood of a high-scoring game. In the last 5 matches combined xG was lower (1.19+1.54=2.73), but seasonal signals are stronger. Therefore the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 goals, while Over 2.5 also has solid support (~80%), and Over 3.5 remains moderately likely (~57%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Balestier Khalsa possesses a clear offensive edge: they score an average of 2.29 goals per match versus Geylang’s 1.4, have a higher xG (1.94 vs 1.36), and register more shots (15.86 vs 11.7) and shots on target (6.57 vs 4.1). The home side have been trailing at the break in 6 of 10 matches (60%), while the visitors have been level at half-time in 4 of 7 games (57%), so a draw at half-time is a realistic outcome. Crucially, Balestier dominate after the break: the visitors score on average 1.57 goals in the second half and win 71% of their second halves, whereas Geylang average only 0.6 goals in second halves. Geylang concede on average 2.6 goals per match versus 1.86 conceded by Balestier and additionally have shipped 6 goals in the 31–45 minute window, highlighting their vulnerability before half-time. On this basis the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Balestier win at full-time (X/2), so I assign the highest probability to that outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Geylang International | Balestier Khalsa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Balestier Khalsa is 57% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Geylang International · 1.76 goals / match - Balestier Khalsa
Geylang International is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - Geylang International · 2.29 goals / match - Balestier Khalsa
Geylang International scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Balestier Khalsa keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).
Balestier Khalsa scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Geylang International keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Geylang International
Over / Under - Balestier Khalsa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Geylang International is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / match - Geylang International · 0.82 pts / match - Balestier Khalsa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Geylang International - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Balestier Khalsa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Geylang International
Balestier Khalsa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Geylang International | Liga | Balestier Khalsa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.82 | 3.61 | ▲ 4.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 59% | 74% | ▲ 94% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 76% | 86% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Geylang International 0 - 0 - 1 Balestier Khalsa. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Geylang International vs Balestier Khalsa?
The S.League match finished Geylang International 2:3 Balestier Khalsa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Geylang International vs Balestier Khalsa?
Geylang International score 1.12 goals per game on average and Balestier Khalsa 1.76. The S.League average is 3.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Geylang International's matches and 65% of Balestier Khalsa's.
What form are Geylang International and Balestier Khalsa in?
Over the last 5 games Geylang International have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Balestier Khalsa 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Geylang International vs Balestier Khalsa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


