Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 12 September 2026

Giana Erminio vs Inter II: match statistics

Giana Erminio crest
Giana Erminio
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Inter II crest
Inter II

Giana Erminio vs Inter II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Giana Erminio played Inter II in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Giana Erminio: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Inter II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Giana Erminio scores 0.94 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Inter II scores 1.11 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.32 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Giana Erminio 42%, Inter II 56%. Over 2.5: Giana Erminio 33%, Inter II 39%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Inter II has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.37. Giana Erminio: 9.9 shots per match, Inter II: 12.4.

Match halves

Giana Erminio: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.58. Inter II: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Giana Erminio: 76-90+ (10 goals). Inter II: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an Inter II win: the visitors have scored 40 goals this season versus the hosts' 34, averaging 1.44 goals per away match with a shot conversion rate of 14%, while Giana at home only averages 0.94 goals per game with a 10% conversion. The visitors win 50% of their away matches, whereas the hosts win 39% of home games, and the goal difference is +5 for Inter II away compared to -4 for the hosts. Giana produces a slightly higher home xG (1.43) than Inter II away (1.36), but this does not translate into goals — the hosts fail to score in 33% of home matches, while Inter II fail to score in only 11% of away fixtures. Both teams concede on average 1.17 goals per game, however the visitors' higher average of shots on target (4.06 vs 3.89) and superior conversion favor Inter II, so I give them about a 55% chance to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The primary signal for BTTS comes from Inter II: season-long share of matches with both teams scoring is 67%, and in the last 5 matches it is 60%, indicating Inter frequently scores and concedes. Giana Erminio averages only 0.78 goals per game this season, but their xG_for is 1.68 (higher than the visitors' xG 1.36), meaning they create chances they fail to convert due to a low conversion rate of 5.0%. Clean sheets are rare: the home side has 28% of matches without conceding, and the visitors 22%, so in 72% and 78% of matches respectively they concede at least one goal. Additionally, in the last 5 games both teams scored and conceded on average 1.2 goals (6 scored and 6 conceded), which confirms a tendency for goal exchange; therefore I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65% versus 35%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG and defensive metrics indicate combined offensive pressure: home xG 1.68, away xG 1.36, and xG against 1.26 for Giana and 1.49 for Inter, yielding expected goals of 1.59 for Giana Erminio and 1.31 for Inter II (total 2.90). This 2.90 expected goals exceeds the league average of 2.32, and Inter II shows high shot conversion of 14% versus the home side's 5% and averages 4.06 shots on target per match, increasing the likelihood of goals. Seasonal indicators confirm the trend: Over 1.5 occurred in 50% of Giana’s matches and 89% of Inter’s matches, while both-teams-to-score rates are 44% and 67% respectively. A Poisson model with a 2.90 total estimates over 1.5 ≈79% and over 2.5 ≈55%, whereas over 3.5 is less likely (~33%). Based on this, the best selection is Over 1.5 (back the over at 1.5): high expected total goals, low clean sheet rates (28% and 22%), and Inter’s strong efficiency support at least two goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a lead at the break and a Full-Time win for Inter II: Inter II led at half-time in 50% of matches, versus Giana Erminio in only 22%, while Inter’s overall win rate is 50% compared to the hosts’ 17%. At half-time Inter II average 0.89 goals vs the hosts’ 0.39, and over the full match Inter score 1.44 goals against Giana’s 0.78, indicating an advantage for the visitors in both the first and second halves. Although the hosts’ xG is 1.68 versus 1.36 for the visitors, the hosts have a very low conversion rate of 5% compared to Inter’s 14% and a lower number of shots on target (3.78 vs 4.06), so the hosts’ xG advantage does not translate into goals. On this basis I assign a 27% probability to the 2/2 scenario, 18% to the Half-Time draw / Full-Time Inter win scenario (X/2), and 9% each to the scenarios where Inter lead at the break but draw (2/X) or lose (2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Giana ErminioInter II
16Shots11
Giana ErminioInter II
7Shots on target6
Giana ErminioInter II
1.96xG1.66
Giana ErminioInter II
4Corners1
Giana ErminioInter II
65Dangerous attacks77
Giana ErminioInter II
13Fouls13
Giana ErminioInter II
4Cards2
Giana ErminioInter II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Giana ErminioInter II
0.94Goals scored / match1.11
Giana ErminioInter II
1.08Goals conceded / match1.06
Giana ErminioInter II
51%Average possession48%
Giana ErminioInter II
3.53Shots on target / match3.92
Giana ErminioInter II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.89Shots per match12.42
Giana ErminioInter II
3.53Shots on target3.92
Giana ErminioInter II
9.6%Shot conversion8.9%
Giana ErminioInter II
51%Possession48%
Giana ErminioInter II
1.37xG for1.52
Giana ErminioInter II
1.22xG against1.38
Giana ErminioInter II

Shooting quality

Giana Erminio: BalancedInter II: Balanced
Giana ErminioInter II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Giana Erminio is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Giana Erminio · 1.2 pts / match - Inter II

Giana Erminio
WWLDL
Season result split
33% W28% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-14
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Inter II
LLWWL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-12-12
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter II is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Giana Erminio · 1.11 goals / match - Inter II

Giana Erminio scoring profile: strong

Giana Erminio scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Inter II scoring profile: strong

Inter II scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while Giana Erminio keeps a clean sheet in 36% (13 of 36 matches).

34Goals scored (season)40
Giana ErminioInter II
39Goals conceded (season)38
Giana ErminioInter II
2.03Average goals in match2.17
Giana ErminioInter II
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Giana ErminioInter II
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Giana ErminioInter II

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal72%
Giana ErminioInter II
22%2 goals36%
Giana ErminioInter II
6%3 goals3%
Giana ErminioInter II
3%4 goals0%
Giana ErminioInter II

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal75%
Giana ErminioInter II
31%2 goals25%
Giana ErminioInter II
14%3 goals3%
Giana ErminioInter II
0%4 goals3%
Giana ErminioInter II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
Giana ErminioInter II
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Giana ErminioInter II
17%Scored in both halves19%
Giana ErminioInter II

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Giana ErminioInter II
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Giana ErminioInter II
40%BTTS - last 560%
Giana ErminioInter II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Giana ErminioInter II
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Giana ErminioInter II
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Giana ErminioInter II

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Giana ErminioInter II
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Giana ErminioInter II
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Giana ErminioInter II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter II is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Giana Erminio · 1.44 pts / match - Inter II

Giana Erminio - half-time state
22% leading47% draw31% trailing
Inter II - half-time state
36% leading36% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.44
Giana ErminioInter II
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Giana ErminioInter II
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Giana ErminioInter II
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.06
Giana ErminioInter II
58%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Giana ErminioInter II
64%No goal before half-time50%
Giana ErminioInter II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Giana ErminioInter II
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Giana ErminioInter II
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Giana ErminioInter II
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Giana ErminioInter II
58%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Giana ErminioInter II
56%No goal after half-time58%
Giana ErminioInter II

Giana Erminio - second-half results

19% W53% D28% L
41
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter II - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
52
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Giana Erminio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Inter II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Giana Erminio
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
5
16-30
2
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
9
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Inter II
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
8
3
16-30
7
8
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
11
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Giana Erminio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Inter II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

Giana ErminioLigaInter II
Average goals in match 2.032.32 2.17
Both teams scored 42%50% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%42% 39%
Clean sheets 36%30% 25%
Goal before half-time 64%66% 72%
Goal after half-time 61%72% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.32
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Giana ErminioYellow cardLuigi Samele
  2. Inter IIYellow cardChristos Alexiou
  3. Giana ErminioGoalLuigi Samele
  4. Giana ErminioYellow cardDaniele Pinto
  5. Giana ErminioSubstitutionOn: Alessandro AlbertiniOff: Vincenzo Vitale
  6. Giana ErminioSubstitutionOn: Alessio RizzoOff: Luigi Samele
  7. Giana ErminioYellow cardLuca Ferri
  8. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Matteo LavelliOff: Christos Alexiou
  9. Giana ErminioYellow cardMatteo Marotta
  10. Inter IIYellow cardMatteo Lavelli
  11. Giana ErminioGoalAlessandro Galeandro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Gianluca GuitaldiMatches officiated: 8
4.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 225%Home wins50%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Giana Erminio 1 - 0 - 0 Inter II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Giana Erminio vs Inter II?

The Serie C Group A match finished Giana Erminio 2:0 Inter II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Giana Erminio vs Inter II?

Giana Erminio score 0.94 goals per game on average and Inter II 1.11. The Serie C Group A average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Giana Erminio's matches and 56% of Inter II's.

What form are Giana Erminio and Inter II in?

Over the last 5 games Giana Erminio have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Inter II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Giana Erminio vs Inter II?

The statistical background for Giana Erminio vs Inter II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.