Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 23 July 2026

Giana Erminio vs Renate: match statistics

Giana Erminio crest
Giana Erminio
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Renate crest
Renate
130%(2.28)
X30%(2.72)
240%(3.40)

Renate displays better form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG for Giana Erminio) and has remained undefeated in this period (2 wins, 3 draws). The visiting team boasts a positive goal difference on the road (+2) compared to the hosts' negative home record (-2). Renate is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.9 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 40% of fixtures. Giana Erminio shows weaker efficiency in home games (40% wins, 30% losses) and concedes an average of 1.2 goals per match. Considering all statistics, Renate holds the advantage, although balanced possession and shooting metrics suggest that a draw is also a realistic scenario.

Giana Erminio vs Renate: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Giana Erminio play Renate in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match date is 10 January 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Giana Erminio: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Renate: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Giana Erminio scores 1.00 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Renate scores 1.39 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Giana Erminio 39%, Renate 55%. Over 2.5: Giana Erminio 32%, Renate 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Renate has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.38. Giana Erminio: 10.1 shots per match, Renate: 12.0.

Match halves

Giana Erminio: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.63. Renate: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Giana Erminio: 76-90+ (11 goals). Renate: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Renate displays better form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG for Giana Erminio) and has remained undefeated in this period (2 wins, 3 draws). The visiting team boasts a positive goal difference on the road (+2) compared to the hosts' negative home record (-2). Renate is characterized by a solid defense in away matches, conceding an average of only 0.9 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 40% of fixtures. Giana Erminio shows weaker efficiency in home games (40% wins, 30% losses) and concedes an average of 1.2 goals per match. Considering all statistics, Renate holds the advantage, although balanced possession and shooting metrics suggest that a draw is also a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Giana ErminioRenate
13Shots8
Giana ErminioRenate
5Shots on target4
Giana ErminioRenate
1.97xG1.34
Giana ErminioRenate
9Corners3
Giana ErminioRenate
109Dangerous attacks75
Giana ErminioRenate
12Fouls14
Giana ErminioRenate
3Cards4
Giana ErminioRenate

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Giana ErminioRenate
1Goals scored / match1.39
Giana ErminioRenate
1.03Goals conceded / match0.97
Giana ErminioRenate
51%Average possession48%
Giana ErminioRenate
3.63Shots on target / match4.39
Giana ErminioRenate

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.11Shots per match12
Giana ErminioRenate
3.63Shots on target4.39
Giana ErminioRenate
9.9%Shot conversion11.6%
Giana ErminioRenate
51%Possession48%
Giana ErminioRenate
1.38xG for1.53
Giana ErminioRenate
1.22xG against1.47
Giana ErminioRenate

Shooting quality

Giana Erminio: BalancedRenate: Balanced
Giana ErminioRenate
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Renate is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Giana Erminio · 2.2 pts / match - Renate

Giana Erminio
LDLWW
Season result split
37% W26% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-14
1.37 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-7
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Renate
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W34% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-13-8
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-8-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Renate is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Giana Erminio · 1.39 goals / match - Renate

Renate is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Giana Erminio · 0.97 goals / match - Renate

Giana Erminio scoring profile: strong

Giana Erminio scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Renate keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

Renate scoring profile: strong

Renate scores in 82% of matches (31 of 38 matches), while Giana Erminio keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

38Goals scored (season)53
Giana ErminioRenate
39Goals conceded (season)37
Giana ErminioRenate
2.03Average goals in match2.37
Giana ErminioRenate
7Goals scored (last 5)10
Giana ErminioRenate
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Giana ErminioRenate

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal82%
Giana ErminioRenate
26%2 goals37%
Giana ErminioRenate
5%3 goals18%
Giana ErminioRenate
3%4 goals3%
Giana ErminioRenate

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal63%
Giana ErminioRenate
29%2 goals24%
Giana ErminioRenate
13%3 goals11%
Giana ErminioRenate
0%4 goals0%
Giana ErminioRenate

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time16%
Giana ErminioRenate
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Giana ErminioRenate
18%Scored in both halves32%
Giana ErminioRenate

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Giana ErminioRenate
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Giana ErminioRenate
40%BTTS - last 580%
Giana ErminioRenate

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Giana ErminioRenate
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Giana ErminioRenate
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Giana ErminioRenate

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Giana ErminioRenate
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Giana ErminioRenate
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Giana ErminioRenate

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Renate is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Giana Erminio · 1.79 pts / match - Renate

Giana Erminio - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Renate - half-time state
47% leading37% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.79
Giana ErminioRenate
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.68
Giana ErminioRenate
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Giana ErminioRenate
0.82Average goals (1st half)1
Giana ErminioRenate
61%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Giana ErminioRenate
63%No goal before half-time37%
Giana ErminioRenate

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Giana ErminioRenate
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Giana ErminioRenate
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Giana ErminioRenate
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.37
Giana ErminioRenate
61%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Giana ErminioRenate
53%No goal after half-time50%
Giana ErminioRenate

Giana Erminio - second-half results

24% W50% R26% P
45
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Renate - second-half results

32% W47% R21% P
68
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding96%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 45%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Giana Erminio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Renate - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Giana Erminio
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
8
9
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Renate
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
9
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
13
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Giana Erminio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Renate

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

Giana ErminioLigaRenate
Average goals in match 2.032.34 2.37
Both teams scored 39%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%43% 50%
Clean sheets 39%30% 37%
Goal before half-time 63%66% 79%
Goal after half-time 63%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Giana Erminio 0 - 1 - 0 Renate. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Renate
1 : 1
Giana Erminio

FAQ

What was the result of Giana Erminio vs Renate?

The Serie C Group A match finished Giana Erminio 0:1 Renate. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Giana Erminio vs Renate?

Giana Erminio score 1.00 goals per game on average and Renate 1.39. The Serie C Group A average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Giana Erminio's matches and 55% of Renate's.

What form are Giana Erminio and Renate in?

Over the last 5 games Giana Erminio have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Renate 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Giana Erminio vs Renate?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Giana Erminio vs Renate: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.