South Korea - K League 2Gimhae Civil StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Gimhae City vs Cheongju: match statistics

Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Cheongju crest
Cheongju

Gimhae City vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimhae City played Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 24 July 2026. Venue: Gimhae Civil Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gimhae City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimhae City scores 0.81 and concedes 2.06 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimhae City 69%, Cheongju 76%. Over 2.5: Gimhae City 56%, Cheongju 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Cheongju has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.21. Gimhae City: 9.3 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.3.

Match halves

Gimhae City: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63. Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Gimhae City: 76-90+ (5 goals). Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win because Cheongju averages 1.38 goals scored and concedes 1.25 on the road, while Gimhae at home scores only 0.71 and concedes 2.71 per match. The visitors have not lost away (0% defeats) and record a high away draw rate (88%); in the last 5 matches Cheongju has 3 wins and an average of 2.0 points per match versus the hosts' 2 wins and 1.4 points per match. Offensively Cheongju averages 4.25 shots on target with a 14% conversion rate, while Gimhae has 3.43 shots on target and only 7% conversion, despite both sides having xG around 1.3 in these conditions. The hosts’ decisive weakness is their defense and home instability: they have lost all home matches (100% defeats), kept 0 clean sheets and have a negative home goal differential (-14), making them vulnerable to opponent attacks. Considering the possession advantage (55% vs 44%) and the visitors’ superior efficiency and defensive stability, I estimate Cheongju win probability at 60%, draw 30% and Gimhae win 10%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong indicator is the seasonal BTTS: Gimhae City 78% and Cheongju 75%, versus the league average 61%. The hosts average 1.0 goals scored and concede 1.89 per match, the visitors score 1.38 and concede 1.25, so both teams are capable of scoring and conceding. The last 5 matches further confirm this tendency — both sides average 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, and clean sheets are rare: 22% and 25%. Chance-quality metrics show Gimhae produces xG 1.53 and 3.56 shots on target on average, while Cheongju has xG 1.30, 4.25 shots on target and a higher conversion rate 14% versus 8% for the hosts, which favors goal exchange. Taking all this into account (78%/75% BTTS, low clean sheets 22%/25%, last 5 matches 1.8-1.4) I pick BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability around 78% vs 22%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals are 1.40 for Gimhae City and 1.32 for Cheongju (total 2.72), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.53 and away conceded xG 1.27, and away attack xG 1.30 and home conceded xG 1.34. Both teams have a high percentage of matches with total goals over 1.5: home 78% and away 75%, and additionally both teams record BTTS in 78% and 75% of matches; this yields a strong signal for Over 1.5 (estimated 80% probability). At the 2.5 line the picture is more balanced: Gimhae has 44% of matches over 2.5, Cheongju 63%, the league average is 56%, and the last 5 matches for both teams show 60% Over 2.5, so I assign a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (56%). The 3.5 line is less likely to be breached — hosts have 33% of matches over 3.5, visitors 50%, but the expected 2.72 goals (league average 2.75) suggest Under 3.5 is more probable (65%). Based on this, the best line to play is Over 1.5 — season rates 78%/75% on Over 1.5, high BTTS incidence and predicted 2.72 goals provide the strongest signal for Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). The away team draws 88% of their matches, the home team 44%, which strongly indicates a propensity for points being shared in regulation. At the break the home side were level in 56% of their matches and the visitors in 25% (approximately 41% on average), so a draw HT is the single most reliable outcome. xG shows a slight home advantage, 1.53 versus 1.30, while the proportion of matches in which both teams scored is 78% and 75%, suggesting a scoring draw (e.g. 1–1) rather than 0–0. Additionally the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate, 14% versus the home side’s 8%, and the home team concedes more goals after the break (1.22 vs 0.75), all of which reinforce X/X as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Gimhae CityCheongju
12Shots10
Gimhae CityCheongju
2Shots on target2
Gimhae CityCheongju
1.48xG1.17
Gimhae CityCheongju
4Corners1
Gimhae CityCheongju
82Dangerous attacks54
Gimhae CityCheongju
13Fouls9
Gimhae CityCheongju
1Cards0
Gimhae CityCheongju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.81Goals scored / match1.18
Gimhae CityCheongju
2.06Goals conceded / match1.59
Gimhae CityCheongju
45%Average possession55%
Gimhae CityCheongju
3.56Shots on target / match3.88
Gimhae CityCheongju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.25Shots per match11.35
Gimhae CityCheongju
3.56Shots on target3.88
Gimhae CityCheongju
8.8%Shot conversion10.4%
Gimhae CityCheongju
45%Possession55%
Gimhae CityCheongju
1.21xG for1.42
Gimhae CityCheongju
1.91xG against1.31
Gimhae CityCheongju

Shooting quality

Gimhae City: BalancedCheongju: Balanced
Gimhae CityCheongju
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimhae City
WLDLW
Season result split
13% W19% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-11
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-7
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 2.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cheongju
LWLDW
Season result split
12% W65% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-0
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cheongju is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Gimhae City · 1.18 goals / match - Cheongju

Cheongju is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.06 goals / match - Gimhae City · 1.59 goals / match - Cheongju

Gimhae City scoring profile: very strong

Gimhae City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

13Goals scored (season)20
Gimhae CityCheongju
33Goals conceded (season)27
Gimhae CityCheongju
2.88Average goals in match2.76
Gimhae CityCheongju
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Gimhae CityCheongju
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Gimhae CityCheongju

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal82%
Gimhae CityCheongju
0%2 goals35%
Gimhae CityCheongju
0%3 goals0%
Gimhae CityCheongju
0%4 goals0%
Gimhae CityCheongju

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
Gimhae CityCheongju
63%2 goals47%
Gimhae CityCheongju
38%3 goals18%
Gimhae CityCheongju
19%4 goals12%
Gimhae CityCheongju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time24%
Gimhae CityCheongju
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Gimhae CityCheongju
0%Scored in both halves24%
Gimhae CityCheongju

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Gimhae CityCheongju
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Gimhae CityCheongju
60%BTTS - last 580%
Gimhae CityCheongju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Gimhae CityCheongju
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Gimhae CityCheongju
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Gimhae CityCheongju

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Gimhae CityCheongju
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Gimhae CityCheongju
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Gimhae CityCheongju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cheongju is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.69 pts / match - Gimhae City · 1.29 pts / match - Cheongju

Gimhae City - half-time state
13% leading31% draw56% trailing
Cheongju - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.69Points per match (1st half)1.29
Gimhae CityCheongju
0.19Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Gimhae CityCheongju
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Gimhae CityCheongju
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.12
Gimhae CityCheongju
38%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Gimhae CityCheongju
81%No goal before half-time47%
Gimhae CityCheongju

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Gimhae CityCheongju
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Gimhae CityCheongju
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Gimhae CityCheongju
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Gimhae CityCheongju
25%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Gimhae CityCheongju
38%No goal after half-time47%
Gimhae CityCheongju

Gimhae City - second-half results

13% W44% R44% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding41%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
7
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimhae CityLigaCheongju
Average goals in match 2.882.75 2.76
Both teams scored 69%61% 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%56% 53%
Clean sheets 13%24% 24%
Goal before half-time 75%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 88%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimhae CityYellow cardJun-Young Cha
  2. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Jae LeeOff: Jun-Gyu Lee
  3. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Yoo-Chan LeeOff: Geon-Hee Pyo
  4. Gimhae CityGoalJe-Wook WooAssist: Sung-Wook Kwak
  5. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Min MoonOff: Kang-Uk Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Gimhae City 0 - 1 - 0 Cheongju. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Gimhae City vs Cheongju?

The K League 2 match finished Gimhae City 1:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimhae City vs Cheongju?

Gimhae City score 0.81 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Gimhae City's matches and 76% of Cheongju's.

What form are Gimhae City and Cheongju in?

Over the last 5 games Gimhae City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cheongju 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimhae City vs Cheongju?

The statistical background for Gimhae City vs Cheongju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.