Gimhae City vs Daegu: match statistics
Gimhae City vs Daegu: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gimhae City play Daegu in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
Gimhae City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Daegu: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gimhae City scores 0.81 and concedes 2.06 goals per match. Daegu scores 2.12 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gimhae City 69%, Daegu 71%. Over 2.5: Gimhae City 56%, Daegu 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Daegu has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.21. Gimhae City: 9.3 shots per match, Daegu: 14.1.
Match halves
Gimhae City: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63. Daegu: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.29.
Goals by minute
Gimhae City: 76-90+ (5 goals). Daegu: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Daegu are the favorites: they sit 7th versus Gimhae City in 17th, with a 4-3-3 seasonal record compared to the hosts' 0-2-8, and have scored 18 goals versus Gimhae's 7. In home matches Gimhae averages only 0.5 goals and concedes 2.5 per game, while Daegu on the road score 1.5 and concede 1.75; the home goal difference is -8 for Gimhae versus -1 for Daegu away. The visitors generate more high-quality chances: average xG is 1.62 for Daegu versus 1.26 for the hosts, and shot conversion is 13% versus 5% with 5.0 shots on target vs 2.75 for Gimhae. Additionally Gimhae have not won any home game (100% losses) and have 50% of home matches without scoring, whereas Daegu have only 25% scoreless matches and average 1.2 points in the last 5 games versus 0.4 points for Gimhae. Based on this I forecast an away win, primarily due to superior attacking efficiency, higher quality of chances (xG) and more stable point accumulation.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gimhae City | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Daegu is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Gimhae City · 2.2 pts / match - Daegu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Daegu is 162% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Gimhae City · 2.12 goals / match - Daegu
Daegu is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.06 goals / match - Gimhae City · 1.35 goals / match - Daegu
Gimhae City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Daegu scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Gimhae City
Over / Under — Daegu
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Daegu is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / match - Gimhae City · 1.53 pts / match - Daegu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Daegu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gimhae City
Daegu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gimhae City | Liga | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.75 | ▲ 3.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 56% | 56% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Gimhae City vs Daegu?
The K League 2 match finished Gimhae City 1:4 Daegu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gimhae City vs Daegu?
Gimhae City score 0.81 goals per game on average and Daegu 2.12. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Gimhae City's matches and 71% of Daegu's.
What form are Gimhae City and Daegu in?
Over the last 5 games Gimhae City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Daegu 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimhae City vs Daegu?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gimhae City vs Daegu: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.