South Korea - K League 2Gimhae Civil StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City
1 : 3half-time 0:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimhae City played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Venue: Gimhae Civil Stadium. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Gimhae City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimhae City scores 0.79 and concedes 2.14 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.67 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimhae City 71%, Seoul E-Land 60%. Over 2.5: Gimhae City 57%, Seoul E-Land 73%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.22. Gimhae City: 9.2 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 12.6.

Match halves

Gimhae City: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.64. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Gimhae City: 46-60 (4 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd, have 8 wins this season and 25 goals scored, and on the road they average 1.43 goals with 12% shot conversion and 4.71 shots on target per match. Gimhae City still has no home wins (0 wins, 100% defeats), scores only 0.67 goals and concedes an average of 2.67 goals per home match, yielding a -12 home goal difference. The quality gap in chances is confirmed by xG: the hosts register 1.30 xG at home versus 1.45 xG for the visitors away, and shot conversion is twice as high for the visitors (12% vs 6%). Seoul E-Land also shows better form and defense — averaging 2.0 points per match in the last 5 fixtures (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) versus 0.8 points for Gimhae (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), and 43% clean sheets away compared to 0% for the hosts. On this basis I assign a high probability to the away win: 75% for Seoul E-Land win, 17% for draw and 8% for a home upset.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes looks more likely: Gimhae City has a seasonal BTTS of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, averaging 1.88 goals scored and 1.38 conceded per match. Seoul E-Land has a seasonal BTTS of 43%, but this rose to 60% in the last 5 matches; the visitors scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches (1.6 avg) while Gimhae scored 5 (1.0). Both teams generate comparable xG: Gimhae 1.60 vs Seoul 1.45, while Gimhae conceded xG against of 2.04 in the last 5 matches versus 1.12 for the visitors, increasing the risk of goals conceded for the home side. Additionally, the league has a seasonal BTTS level of 63% and an average of 2.74 goals per match, and the home team has over2.5 in 88% of games and an over2.5 + BTTS combination in 75%, which further boosts the chance of an exchange of goals; at the same time the higher clean sheet expected for the visitors at 43% weakens the signal, hence a 70% vs 30% assessment.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model gives 1.48 xG for Gimhae City and 1.26 xG for Seoul E-Land, totaling 2.74 expected goals. Gimhae averages 1.88 goals at home and has 88% of matches Over 2.5, while Seoul E-Land averages 1.43 goals away with 57% Over 2.5 — this translates into a strong signal for Over 2.5 (I rate it 72%). Additionally, 75% of Gimhae’s home matches and 43% of Seoul’s away matches end with both teams scoring, and in the last 5 games the visitors had 80% of matches Over 2.5, which reinforces the higher-goals forecast. Over 1.5 is even more likely (82% vs 18%) whereas Over 3.5 is much less certain (34% vs 66%), so the best value to play appears to be the Over market at the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gimhae City led at the break in 63% of their matches and averages 0.88 goals by half-time versus 0.57 for visitors, indicating strong starts from the hosts. Over the full 90 minutes, however, Seoul E-Land posts superior seasonal outcomes: 57% wins versus 50% for the home side, and in the last five matches the visitors have won 60% of games compared to 20% for the hosts. The away side is stronger after the break: Seoul has a positive goal differential in second halves of +3.0 versus 0.0 for Gimhae, and in the last five matches they average 1.6 points in second halves compared to 1.0 for the hosts. Gimhae simultaneously show higher xG and more shots on target (xG 1.6 vs 1.45; 5.5 shots on target vs 4.71), which explains their first-half advantage, but does not guarantee holding the lead to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
11Shots26
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
3Shots on target10
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1.29xG3.06
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
2Corners11
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
53Dangerous attacks102
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
8Fouls9
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
3Cards1
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0.79Goals scored / match1.67
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
2.14Goals conceded / match1.2
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
46%Average possession50%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
3.57Shots on target / match5.13
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.21Shots per match12.6
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
3.57Shots on target5.13
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
8.5%Shot conversion13.2%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
46%Possession50%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1.22xG for1.53
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1.86xG against1.21
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Gimhae City: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Gimhae City · 1.4 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Gimhae City
LLWLD
Season result split
7% W21% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-10
0.43 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-6
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Seoul E-Land
LDWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 111% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Gimhae City · 1.67 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Seoul E-Land is 78% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.14 goals / match - Gimhae City · 1.2 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Gimhae City scoring profile: very strong

Gimhae City scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

11Goals scored (season)25
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
30Goals conceded (season)18
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
2.93Average goals in match2.87
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal87%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0%2 goals53%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0%3 goals27%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal67%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
64%2 goals40%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
36%3 goals13%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
21%4 goals0%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time27%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0%Scored in both halves40%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
80%BTTS - last 560%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 220% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Gimhae City · 1.6 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Gimhae City - half-time state
7% leading29% draw64% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1.6
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0.14Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1Average goals (1st half)1.2
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
29%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
86%No goal before half-time40%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
1.93Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
21%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land
36%No goal after half-time33%
Gimhae CitySeoul E-Land

Gimhae City - second-half results

14% W43% R43% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

47% W27% R27% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
6
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimhae CityLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 2.932.75 2.87
Both teams scored 71%63% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%56% 73%
Clean sheets 7%23% 33%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 80%
Goal after half-time 93%76% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimhae CityYellow cardBeka Mikeltadze
  2. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Woo KimOff: Ju-hwan Kim
  3. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Joo-wan AnOff: Alan Lima Cariús
  4. Gimhae CityYellow cardJun-Young Cha
  5. Seoul E-LandGoalJae-Yong Park
  6. Seoul E-LandYellow cardElosman Euller Silva Cavalcanti
  7. Gimhae CityYellow cardBruno Xavier Almeida Costa
  8. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Miguel Baggio CoverOff: Geon-Hee Pyo
  9. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Jin-Seok SeoOff: Seok-Joo Yoon
  10. Gimhae CityGoalHo-Yeong SeongAssist: Seung-Jae Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Gimhae City 1:3 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land?

Gimhae City score 0.79 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.67. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Gimhae City's matches and 60% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Gimhae City and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Gimhae City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land?

The statistical background for Gimhae City vs Seoul E-Land — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.