South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen played Jeonnam Dragons in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 7 June 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Jeonnam Dragons: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.31 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Jeonnam Dragons scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 54%, Jeonnam Dragons 46%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 38%, Jeonnam Dragons 46%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Jeonnam Dragons has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.42. Gimpo Citizen: 11.1 shots per match, Jeonnam Dragons: 12.4.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.77. Jeonnam Dragons: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (7 goals). Jeonnam Dragons: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen are clear favorites: they sit 6th with a season record of 6 wins, 5 draws and only 2 losses and a goal difference of 17:12, while Jeonnam Dragons are 16th with 1 win, 4 draws and 8 losses and a 13:21 record. In their last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 and conceded 4 (1.2 scored and 0.8 conceded per game), registering 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, which equates to an average of 2 points per game; Jeonnam over the same period managed just 3 goals and conceded 6 (0.6 scored, 1.2 conceded) and failed to win, averaging 0.4 points per game. On the road Jeonnam concede 1.7 goals per game on average, with xG against of 1.45 versus their own xG of 1.27, and despite 10.7 shots and 3 on target per match their conversion rate is about 10%, highlighting issues in chance conversion. Additionally the visitors fail to register a shot on target in 50% of away games and have only 10% clean sheets and a negative goal differential of -6 away, which strongly favors the hosts. Based on this I predict a home win; I estimate the probabilities at 70% for Gimpo, 18% for a draw and 12% for a Jeonnam win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes. Gimpo has 0% clean sheets this season, and Jeonnam concedes an average of 1.7 goals away, significantly raising the visitors' scoring chances. Hosts generate a lot of chances — average xG 2.08, 18 shots and 4 on target per match — versus Jeonnam's xG against 1.45, so Gimpo scoring is realistic despite a low season conversion rate of 4%. Although Gimpo's season BTTS is only 33%, they had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches and scored 6 goals (1.2 per match), indicating improved finishing. Jeonnam's season BTTS is 50% and they score 1.1 goals away; in their last 5 matches they scored 3 goals (0.6 per match) with xG 1.59, so visitors also have potential to score despite poor form (lddll). Considering Gimpo's 0% clean sheets, xG 2.08 vs 1.45, a league BTTS level of 62% and stronger home form, I estimate BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and recommend "Yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated expected goals are 1.77 for Gimpo and 1.33 for Jeonnam (total 3.10). These values come from averaging each side’s xG: Gimpo xG_for 2.08 versus Jeonnam away xG_conceded 1.45 => (2.08+1.45)/2=1.77; Jeonnam xG_for 1.27 versus Gimpo xG_conceded 1.39 => (1.27+1.39)/2=1.33. With a combined lambda=3.10 the Poisson distribution yields probability of Over 1.5 ≈82% (1 - P(0 or 1)), Over 2.5 ≈60% and Over 3.5 ≈38%. Match statistics add context: Gimpo averages 18 shots and 4 on target but has a low conversion rate of 4% and scores only 0.67 goals per game, while Jeonnam scores 1.1 goals per game and concedes an average 1.7 goals (21 conceded) — this supports a multi-goal scenario. Considering the home xG advantage and that our expectation of 3.10 is above the league average of 2.7, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

HT data indicate Jeonnam hold the lead at the break more often: the visitors score an average of 0.7 goals by half-time and have 15 goals before the break this season, while Gimpo average 0.0 goals to half-time with only 1 such goal, suggesting Jeonnam more frequently lead at the midway point. However, Gimpo are significantly stronger after the break — they average 1.67 goals in the second half and score after the break in 100% of matches, and their recent form is 'ldwww' with a 60% win rate in the last five outings, indicating the hosts' ability to stage a turnaround. Gimpo also create more opportunities: xG 2.08 versus 1.27 for Jeonnam and an average of 18 shots compared to 10.7, so they have the tools to press and come back in the second half. Considering the visitors have led at the break in 30% of matches and the hosts regularly score after the interval, the strongest scenario is Jeonnam leading at half-time and Gimpo winning by full-time (2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
15Shots10
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
4Shots on target4
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1.88xG1.39
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
7Corners7
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
91Dangerous attacks66
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
15Fouls20
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
4Cards2
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1.31Goals scored / match1
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0.92Goals conceded / match1.62
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
50%Average possession48%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
4.08Shots on target / match3.46
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.08Shots per match12.38
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
4.08Shots on target3.46
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
11.8%Shot conversion8.1%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
50%Possession48%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1.42xG for1.47
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1.2xG against1.46
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedJeonnam Dragons: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
Accuracy (shots on target)37%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 0.4 pts / match - Jeonnam Dragons

Gimpo Citizen
LDWWW
Season result split
46% W38% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-2
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Jeonnam Dragons
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W31% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-8
0.54 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1 goals / match - Jeonnam Dragons

Gimpo Citizen is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.62 goals / match - Jeonnam Dragons

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Jeonnam Dragons keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

Jeonnam Dragons scoring profile: mixed

Jeonnam Dragons scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

17Goals scored (season)13
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
12Goals conceded (season)21
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
2.23Average goals in match2.62
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal46%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
31%2 goals38%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
15%3 goals8%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0%4 goals8%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal92%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
23%2 goals54%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
8%3 goals8%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0%4 goals8%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time15%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
31%Scored in both halves8%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
60%BTTS - last 540%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
15%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1 pts / match - Jeonnam Dragons

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
23% leading62% draw15% trailing
Jeonnam Dragons - half-time state
23% leading31% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1Average goals (1st half)1.23
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
54%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
54%No goal before half-time69%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
69%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons
31%No goal after half-time77%
Gimpo CitizenJeonnam Dragons

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

54% W23% R23% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jeonnam Dragons - second-half results

23% W23% R54% P
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding35%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Jeonnam Dragons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Jeonnam Dragons
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Jeonnam Dragons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaJeonnam Dragons
Average goals in match 2.232.72 2.62
Both teams scored 54%62% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%56% 46%
Clean sheets 38%24% 8%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%75% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Jeonnam DragonsGoalMin-Ho Yun
  2. Jeonnam DragonsGoalJun-Yeong Min
  3. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardDong-Min Kim
  4. Jeonnam DragonsSubstitutionOn: Yong-Hwan KimOff: Joo-Yeop Kim
  5. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuis Fabián Mina Zapata
  6. Jeonnam DragonsYellow cardMin-Ho Yun
  7. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardBo-Sang Yoon
  8. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardConnor Edward Chapman
  9. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Si-Heon LeeOff: Dong-Jin Park
  10. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardTae-Han Kim
  11. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Do-Hyuk KimOff: Seong-Jun Kim
  12. Jeonnam DragonsYellow cardJi-Ha Yoo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Gimpo Citizen 1 - 1 - 1 Jeonnam Dragons. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 0
Jeonnam Dragons FC
Jeonnam Dragons FC
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 1
Jeonnam Dragons FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 2:2 Jeonnam Dragons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Jeonnam Dragons?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 1, Jeonnam Dragons won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.31 goals per game on average and Jeonnam Dragons 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 46% of Jeonnam Dragons's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Jeonnam Dragons in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Jeonnam Dragons 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?

The statistical background for Gimpo Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.