South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Seongnam crest
Seongnam

Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen played Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Seongnam: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.23 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Seongnam scores 1.09 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 59%, Seongnam 64%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 36%, Seongnam 41%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.52. Gimpo Citizen: 12.9 shots per match, Seongnam: 12.1.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.64. Seongnam: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (9 goals). Seongnam: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-4-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen hold a clear edge in chance creation at home: their average xG stands at 1.89 compared with Seongnam’s 1.44 away from home, while the hosts also register 15.63 shots per match versus 12.18 for their opponents. Both teams have recorded identical form across their last five matches, with 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat, scoring 8 and 7 goals respectively. However, the strongest trend is Gimpo’s propensity for draws at home, accounting for as much as 63% of their home matches, with just 13% ending in victories. Seongnam lose 45% of their away matches and fail to score in 27% of them, while defensively conceding an average of 1.45 goals—very close to Gimpo’s 1.50 at home. The hosts should create more chances, but the evenly matched recent form and Gimpo’s high draw rate point towards a stalemate.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seongnam have recorded BTTS in 73% of their matches this season, while Gimpo Citizen have done so in 55%, against a league average of 63%, providing a moderately clear signal for goals at both ends. Both teams are also in a stronger attacking run of form: BTTS has landed in 80% of each side’s last 5 matches. During this period, Gimpo averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Seongnam scored 1.4 and allowed 1.2 goals per game. Their chance-creation potential is further supported by xG figures of 1.60 for the hosts and 1.54 for the visitors across their last five matches. The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily backed by Seongnam’s poor clean-sheet record this season, at just 9%, although Gimpo’s 27% clean-sheet rate limits confidence in this scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Gimpo average 1.00 goals per match, but their xG is significantly higher at 1.59, while Seongnam concede an average of 1.45 goals, raising the hosts’ attacking potential to around 1.36 goals. The visitors score an average of 1.18 goals with an xG of 1.44, but Gimpo rank among the more solid defensive sides, conceding just 0.91 goals per match. In their last five matches, both teams had at least three goals in 60% of their games; however, over the entire season, Gimpo have recorded fewer than 3.5 goals in 82% of matches, compared with 73% for Seongnam. Additionally, neither team has scored more than three goals in a single match this season, limiting the risk of a very high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.55 goals points to a match with a realistic chance of 2-3 goals, making Under 3.5 the market with the strongest statistical support.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at both half-time and full-time, as Gimpo drew 55% of their matches this season, with 55% also level at the break. Seongnam likewise tend to start cautiously: they were level after 45 minutes in 45% of their matches, while both teams average only 0.55 goals before half-time. Gimpo have slightly better defensive control, conceding an average of 0.91 goals per match compared with Seongnam’s 1.45, but the hosts’ attacking edge is not clear-cut, with an xG of 1.59 versus 1.44. After the break, Gimpo drew 82% of their second-half periods, further supporting the expectation of a level scoreline through to the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
9Shots11
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
2Shots on target5
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.46xG1.46
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
4Corners6
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
103Dangerous attacks57
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
11Fouls9
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
2Cards3
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.23Goals scored / match1.09
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.18Goals conceded / match1.18
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
50%Average possession54%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
4.36Shots on target / match3.77
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.95Shots per match12.05
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
4.36Shots on target3.77
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
9.5%Shot conversion9.1%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
50%Possession54%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.6xG for1.52
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.25xG against1.35
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedSeongnam: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seongnam is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.4 pts / match - Seongnam

Gimpo Citizen
DDWDL
Season result split
32% W45% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-5
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Seongnam
LWLWD
Season result split
27% W41% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-7
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.09 goals / match - Seongnam

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Seongnam scoring profile: strong

Seongnam scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
26Goals conceded (season)26
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
2.41Average goals in match2.27
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal68%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
27%2 goals32%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
14%3 goals9%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal82%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
32%2 goals27%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
9%3 goals9%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
5%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time18%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
5%BTTS in both halves9%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
23%Scored in both halves18%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
80%BTTS - last 580%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seongnam is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.45 pts / match - Seongnam

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
23% leading55% draw23% trailing
Seongnam - half-time state
32% leading50% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.45
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.14Average goals (1st half)0.95
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
45%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
55%No goal before half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.32
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
59%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam
41%No goal after half-time55%
Gimpo CitizenSeongnam

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

41% W27% R32% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seongnam - second-half results

9% W64% R27% P
32
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Seongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
10
46-60
3
0
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaSeongnam
Average goals in match 2.412.70 2.27
Both teams scored 59%62% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%53% 41%
Clean sheets 27%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 68%68% 59%
Goal after half-time 82%77% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardHak-Min Lee
  2. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardIn-Jae Lee
  3. SeongnamYellow cardJae-wook Lee
  4. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jeong-Bin LeeOff: Paul Breitner Villero Arevalo
  5. SeongnamYellow cardSang-Min Lee
  6. SeongnamGoalMin-gyu JeonAssist: Venício Tomás Ferreira dos Santos Fernandes
  7. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Byeong-gyu ParkOff: Rodrigo Luiz Angelotti
  8. SeongnamGoalByeong-gyu Park
  9. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Sang-Hyun ParkOff: Sung-Bum Choi
  10. Gimpo CitizenGoalDong-Jin ParkAssist: Min-Seog Kim
  11. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Chang-Beom HongOff: Jae-wook Lee
  12. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Chang-Seok LimOff: Do-Hyuk Kim
  13. SeongnamYellow cardByeong-jun Kwon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gimpo Citizen 0 - 4 - 0 Seongnam. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Seongnam
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen
Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:2 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 0, Seongnam won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.23 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.09. The K League 2 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 64% of Seongnam's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Seongnam 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.