South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 02 September 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Suwon Bluewings: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen vs Suwon Bluewings: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen played Suwon Bluewings in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Suwon Bluewings: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.24 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Suwon Bluewings scores 1.45 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 57%, Suwon Bluewings 45%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 33%, Suwon Bluewings 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Suwon Bluewings has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.62. Gimpo Citizen: 13.2 shots per match, Suwon Bluewings: 13.9.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.62. Suwon Bluewings: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (9 goals). Suwon Bluewings: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Suwon Bluewings lead the league and have a clearly superior season record: 13 wins and 32 goals scored, conceding 19, while Gimpo Citizen have won 7 times and scored 26 goals. Both teams are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws each, so the hosts’ current form limits the extent of the visitors’ advantage. Away from home, Suwon average 1.64 goals, have failed to score in none of their matches and concede only 1.00 goal per game, while Gimpo draw as many as 71% of their home matches. The visitors also have the stronger defensive record in terms of chance quality, allowing 0.96 xG compared with Gimpo’s 1.22, and 45% of their away matches end with a clean sheet. Gimpo generate a high 1.99 xG at home, so a draw remains a realistic outcome, but Suwon’s superior efficiency—10% versus 8%—favours a narrow win for the league leaders.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which at least one team fails to score has a slight edge, mainly due to Gimpo’s solid defence. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 55% of their matches this season and concede just 0.73 goals on average, while in their last five games they have allowed opponents only 0.6 goals per match. Gimpo has recorded BTTS - Yes in just 36% of matches and failed to score in 36%, increasing the risk that they will not convert their chances against Suwon, whose average xG conceded is 0.96. Suwon should pose a threat, averaging 1.64 goals, generating 1.88 xG and registering 5.73 shots on target per match, but the hosts’ strong defence could limit them to a win without conceding or a 0:0 draw. The last five matches involving both teams produced BTTS - Yes in 60% of cases, so the edge for BTTS - No is narrow, although Gimpo’s season data is clearly more restrictive.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Suwon Bluewings create more chances than Gimpo, averaging 1.88 xG and 5.73 shots on target per match compared with the hosts’ 1.51 xG and 4.27 shots on target. However, Gimpo remain very solid defensively, conceding just 0.73 goals on average, keeping a clean sheet in 55% of matches, and allowing opponents only 1.11 xG. In their last five matches, the two teams conceded a combined total of 3 and 5 goals respectively, confirming the limited potential for a four-goal game. Moreover, under 3.5 goals landed in 73% of matches for each team, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick despite the visitors’ good current attacking form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Suwon Bluewings win at full-time, as Gimpo were level at the break in 64% of their matches, while Suwon recorded a draw at half-time in as many as 80% of their last five games. The hosts are very difficult to dominate before the break: they have conceded an average of just 0.18 goals during the first half and have never gone into half-time trailing. However, after the interval, the attacking advantage lies with the visitors, who score an average of 1.18 goals compared with Gimpo’s 0.73, while their average has risen to 1.6 goals across their last five appearances. Suwon also create more chances over the course of the match, recording an xG of 1.88 compared with the hosts’ 1.51 and 5.73 shots on target versus 4.27, supporting a later turnaround in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
8Shots17
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1Shots on target5
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.11xG1.9
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
4Corners6
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
71Dangerous attacks66
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
9Fouls8
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1Cards0
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.24Goals scored / match1.45
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.05Goals conceded / match0.86
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
50%Average possession59%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
4.48Shots on target / match5
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.19Shots per match13.86
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
4.48Shots on target5
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
9.4%Shot conversion10.5%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
50%Possession59%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.62xG for1.69
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.21xG against1.04
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedSuwon Bluewings: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Suwon Bluewings is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 2.2 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings

Gimpo Citizen
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W48% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-4
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.21Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Suwon Bluewings
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
59% W23% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Suwon Bluewings is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.45 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings

Suwon Bluewings is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 0.86 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Suwon Bluewings keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 matches).

Suwon Bluewings scoring profile: very strong

Suwon Bluewings scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

26Goals scored (season)32
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
22Goals conceded (season)19
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
2.29Average goals in match2.32
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
7Goals scored (last 5)10
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal82%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
29%2 goals41%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
14%3 goals18%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0%4 goals5%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal50%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
29%2 goals32%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
5%3 goals5%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time14%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
24%Scored in both halves32%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
80%BTTS - last 560%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Suwon Bluewings is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.64 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading57% draw19% trailing
Suwon Bluewings - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.64
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.14Average goals (1st half)0.73
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
48%Clean sheet before half-time77%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
52%No goal before half-time50%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.73
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
1.14Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
62%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings
43%No goal after half-time36%
Gimpo CitizenSuwon Bluewings

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

43% W29% R29% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Suwon Bluewings - second-half results

45% W36% R18% P
36
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding164%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Suwon Bluewings - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Suwon Bluewings
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
4
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Suwon Bluewings

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaSuwon Bluewings
Average goals in match 2.292.72 2.32
Both teams scored 57%62% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%53% 50%
Clean sheets 29%23% 50%
Goal before half-time 67%69% 59%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Suwon BluewingsGoalSeong-Jin KangAssist: Hyun-Muk Kang
  2. Suwon BluewingsGoalBruno da Silva CostaAssist: Min-woo Kim
  3. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Si-Heon LeeOff: Do-Hyuk Kim
  4. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardSi-Heon Lee
  5. Suwon BluewingsSubstitutionOn: Seong-Ju KimOff: Ho-Yeon Jeong
  6. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-Sik KimOff: Dong-Jin Park
  7. Suwon BluewingsSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Seo HanOff: Jeong-Ho Hong
  8. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hak-Min LeeOff: Luan Dias da Silva
  9. Suwon BluewingsGoalEdgaras Dubickas
  10. Suwon BluewingsGoalSeong-Jin KangAssist: Bruno da Silva Costa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gimpo Citizen 2 - 2 - 0 Suwon Bluewings. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Suwon Bluewings
0 : 1
Gimpo Citizen
Suwon Samsung Bluewings FC
1 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
3 : 1
Suwon Samsung Bluewings FC
Suwon Samsung Bluewings FC
1 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Suwon Bluewings?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:4 Suwon Bluewings. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Suwon Bluewings?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 2, Suwon Bluewings won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Suwon Bluewings?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.24 goals per game on average and Suwon Bluewings 1.45. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 45% of Suwon Bluewings's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Suwon Bluewings in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Suwon Bluewings 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Suwon Bluewings?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.