Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Gnistan vs Jaro: match statistics

Gnistan crest
Gnistan
5 : 0half-time 1:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

Gnistan vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gnistan played Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Gnistan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Jaro: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gnistan scores 0.83 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.67 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gnistan 50%, Jaro 50%. Over 2.5: Gnistan 33%, Jaro 17%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.44 vs 0.91. Gnistan: 7.7 shots per match, Jaro: 11.5.

Match halves

Gnistan: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Jaro: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Gnistan: 61-75 (3 goals). Jaro: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I expect a draw in this match. Jaro has yet to record an away win (0 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses — 67% draws), while Gnistan have only 1 home victory this season and a 33% home win rate. The visitors create significantly more chances: on average 14 shots and 5.33 shots on target with xG 1.61 per game, versus the hosts’ 7.67 shots, 2.33 on target and xG 0.91. Despite that, Jaro convert very poorly away (2% conversion rate and only 0.33 goals per away match), whereas Gnistan at home have a 13% conversion and an average of 1.00 goal, which reduces the visitors’ qualitative advantage in chances. Additionally, the hosts concede 2.67 goals at home on average, but in the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points per game (goal difference 6–5), while the visitors have 1.0 PPG and a goal difference of 8–10 in their last 5, which increases the likelihood of a shared point.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend BTTS - Yes: Gnistan has a season BTTS rate of 67% and 40% in the last 5 matches, while Jaro has a season BTTS rate of 33% and 60% in their last five, which together provides a strong signal for both teams to score. Jaro creates more chances (xG 1.61, avg. 14.0 shots and 5.33 shots on target) versus Gnistan (xG 1.28, 9.0 shots and 3.67 shots on target), so the visitors have a realistic chance to score. Gnistan average 1.2 goals in the last 5 matches, and Jaro concede an average of 2.0 goals in that period; seasonally Gnistan scored 5 and conceded 11, and Jaro scored 4 and conceded 7, showing both teams regularly concede. Additionally, the home side have 0% clean sheets this season, and the league average BTTS is 47% with 2.18 goals per game, so accounting for xG, shots and recent form I assess BTTS at 65% vs 35% and recommend 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG estimate for this match is 1.31 for Gnistan (calculated from xG 1.28 and opponent-average xG 1.34) and 1.40 for Jaro (xG 1.61 and opponent-average xG 1.19), giving a combined 2.71 expected goals. Both teams have 67% of their season matches over 1.5 goals (Gnistan 67%, Jaro 67%), so historically Over 1.5 occurs frequently and confirms the xG signal. Jaro attempts significantly more shots (14 avg vs 9) and more on target (5.33 vs 3.67) and has the higher xG, but their shot conversion is only 2%, which explains the low goals-per-game of 0.33 and may correct in upcoming matches. Gnistan has not kept a single clean sheet (0% matches without conceding) and concedes 1.33 goals on average, so both sides are susceptible to conceding; for this reason I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, while Over 2.5 is moderately likely (Gnistan 33% Over 2.5, Jaro 0%, league 32%), and Over 3.5 looks unlikely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a Half-Time draw and a Gnistan turnaround to win (X/1). The hosts average 0.67 goals by half-time versus 0.33 for the visitors, and the hosts have scored at least one goal by the break in 100% of matches this season compared to 67% for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of first-half goals but not a clear lead. Jaro generates higher xG (1.61 vs 1.28) and more shots (14 vs 9) and shots on target (5.33 vs 3.67); however, their conversion rate is only 2% versus 11% for the hosts, so many chances have not translated into an early lead. After the break the numbers favour Gnistan: average second-half goals 1.0 versus 0.33 for the visitors, and the hosts won the second half in 60% of their last five matches (vs 20% for Jaro), supporting a Gnistan turnaround in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
GnistanJaro
15Shots11
GnistanJaro
8Shots on target2
GnistanJaro
1.81xG1.2
GnistanJaro
4Corners3
GnistanJaro
42Dangerous attacks50
GnistanJaro
8Fouls14
GnistanJaro
1Cards1
GnistanJaro

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match0.67
GnistanJaro
1.83Goals conceded / match1.17
GnistanJaro
41%Average possession46%
GnistanJaro
2.5Shots on target / match4.5
GnistanJaro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.67Shots per match11.5
GnistanJaro
2.5Shots on target4.5
GnistanJaro
10.9%Shot conversion5.8%
GnistanJaro
41%Possession46%
GnistanJaro
0.91xG for1.44
GnistanJaro
1.65xG against1.26
GnistanJaro

Shooting quality

Gnistan: BalancedJaro: Balanced
GnistanJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.15

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gnistan is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Gnistan · 0.8 pts / match - Jaro

Gnistan
LLDWD
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Jaro
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-2
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gnistan is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Gnistan · 0.67 goals / match - Jaro

Jaro is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Gnistan · 1.17 goals / match - Jaro

Gnistan scoring profile: very strong

Gnistan scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

5Goals scored (season)4
GnistanJaro
11Goals conceded (season)7
GnistanJaro
2.67Average goals in match1.83
GnistanJaro
4Goals scored (last 5)4
GnistanJaro
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
GnistanJaro

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
GnistanJaro
17%2 goals17%
GnistanJaro
0%3 goals0%
GnistanJaro
0%4 goals0%
GnistanJaro

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal83%
GnistanJaro
33%2 goals33%
GnistanJaro
33%3 goals0%
GnistanJaro
17%4 goals0%
GnistanJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
GnistanJaro
0%BTTS in both halves17%
GnistanJaro
17%Scored in both halves17%
GnistanJaro

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
GnistanJaro
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
GnistanJaro
40%BTTS - last 560%
GnistanJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
GnistanJaro
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
GnistanJaro
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
GnistanJaro

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
GnistanJaro
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
GnistanJaro
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
GnistanJaro

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Gnistan · 1.33 pts / match - Jaro

Gnistan - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.33
GnistanJaro
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
GnistanJaro
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
GnistanJaro
1Average goals (1st half)1.17
GnistanJaro
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
GnistanJaro
67%No goal before half-time50%
GnistanJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)0.67
GnistanJaro
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
GnistanJaro
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
GnistanJaro
1.67Average goals (2nd half)0.67
GnistanJaro
33%Clean sheet after half-time50%
GnistanJaro
50%No goal after half-time83%
GnistanJaro

Gnistan - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jaro - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gnistan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gnistan
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gnistan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.77
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

GnistanLigaJaro
Average goals in match 2.672.27 1.83
Both teams scored 50%51% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%34% 17%
Clean sheets 17%28% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%78% 83%
Goal after half-time 100%73% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroSubstitutionOn: Rudi VikströmOff: Linus Zetterström
  2. JaroYellow cardMats Pedersen
  3. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Sergei EremenkoOff: Saku Ylätupa
  4. JaroSubstitutionOn: Aron BjonbäckOff: Jim Myrevik
  5. GnistanGoalJoakim Latonen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Gnistan 0 - 1 - 1 Jaro. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

IF Gnistan
1 : 2
FF Jaro
FF Jaro
1 : 1
IF Gnistan

FAQ

What was the result of Gnistan vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Gnistan 5:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gnistan and Jaro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Gnistan won 0, Jaro won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gnistan vs Jaro?

Gnistan score 0.83 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.67. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Gnistan's matches and 50% of Jaro's.

What form are Gnistan and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games Gnistan have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Jaro 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gnistan vs Jaro?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gnistan vs Jaro: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.