Go Ahead Eagles vs AZ: match statistics
Go Ahead Eagles vs AZ: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Go Ahead Eagles played AZ in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Go Ahead Eagles: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. AZ: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Go Ahead Eagles scores 1.67 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. AZ scores 1.73 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.18 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Go Ahead Eagles 57%, AZ 63%. Over 2.5: Go Ahead Eagles 60%, AZ 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
AZ has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.43. Go Ahead Eagles: 11.6 shots per match, AZ: 15.6.
Match halves
Go Ahead Eagles: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.93. AZ: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Go Ahead Eagles: 76-90+ (12 goals). AZ: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eredivisie: 3.18 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Go Ahead Eagles possess a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: they average 2.2 goals scored at home and concede 1.33 per match, with a home goal difference of +13; meanwhile AZ average only 1.2 goals scored away and concede 1.6, yielding a negative away goal difference of -6. The hosts are also more precise — they register 6.67 on-target shots at home versus AZ’s 5.73 on target away and have a conversion rate of 16% compared to the visitors’ 8%; additionally Go Ahead fail to score in only 7% of home matches, while AZ are shut out in 20% of away fixtures. xG metrics show similar quality of chance creation (xG 1.70 for the hosts at home vs 1.67 for AZ away), so efficiency and defensive organization may be decisive. In short-term form AZ look better — in the last 5 matches the visitors averaged 2.0 points per game and recorded 3 wins, while the hosts averaged 1.4 points and 2 wins; both teams scored 12 goals and conceded 6 in their last five. Considering the superior efficiency of the hosts (16% conversion, 2.2 home goals per game), the better home balance (+13 vs -6) and the lower share of matches without scoring (7% vs 20%), I tip Go Ahead Eagles to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The baseline BTTS assessment is based on seasonal metrics: Go Ahead Eagles has BTTS 73%, AZ has 53%, giving a combined team average of 63% which matches the league average of 63%. However, over the last 5 matches their rates have dropped to 20% (Go Ahead) and 40% (AZ), averaging 30%; applying a 70% weight to season form and 30% to recent form yields a starting point of about 53%. Offensive and defensive numbers further increase the probability of both teams scoring: Go Ahead averages 2.27 goals at home seasonally, AZ scores 1.20 away; attacking xG is 1.81 (Go Ahead) vs 1.67 (AZ), and AZ concedes 1.6 goals seasonally with xG against 1.47. Additionally, both teams have only 27% of matches with a clean sheet, and in the last 5 meetings both sides scored 12 goals and conceded 6 each, indicating consistency in goal entries from both sides. Considering Go Ahead’s strong attack, AZ’s susceptibility to conceding (1.6) and the seasonal BTTS advantage, I ultimately rate BTTS at 62% vs 38%, therefore I pick BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and expected goals analysis indicate a match with clear goal potential: expected xG is 1.64 for Go Ahead Eagles and 1.48 for AZ, totaling 3.12 expected goals. Go Ahead averages 2.27 goals at home, AZ scores 1.20 away; both have high rates of matches over 1.5 goals: 93% (home) and 73% (away). The home side averages 16.13 shots with 6.27 on target and a 14% conversion rate, AZ has 15.0 shots with 5.73 on target and an 8% conversion — this increases the likelihood of chances being converted, especially by the hosts. Additionally, both teams frequently finish matches with both teams scoring: 73% for the home team and 53% for the away team, and in the last 5 fixtures each has averaged 2.4 goals (12 goals in 5), which confirms a tendency toward high-scoring games. Consequently I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (strongest signal): I estimate probability of Over 1.5 at 86% (Under 14%), Over 2.5 at 68% (Under 32%) and Over 3.5 at 44% (Under 56%) — the 1.5 line provides the largest safety margin relative to the cited statistics.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Go Ahead Eagles led at the break in 9 season matches (60%) and score an average of 1.4 goals in the first half versus 0.47 for AZ, while the hosts concede only 0.6 goals on average by half-time — a strong signal in favor of the home side leading after 45 minutes. Over the full match Go Ahead average 2.27 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, compared to AZ’s 1.2 scored and 1.6 conceded; additionally the home side’s average points per game is 1.93 versus 1.27 for the visitors, which favors a home win. The hosts have a higher attacking xG of 1.81 against AZ’s 1.67, register more shots on target (6.27 vs 5.73) and possess better shot conversion (14% vs 8%), so the attacking edge should help maintain the lead. Although home matches often finish with goals at both ends (73% vs 53% for AZ), the seasonal first-half stats (60% of Go Ahead leading at the break) and the goal advantage lead me to select a Half-Time/Full-Time lead at the break and victory by full-time. I estimate the probability of HT/FT 1/1 at around 45% as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Go Ahead Eagles | AZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AZ is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Go Ahead Eagles · 1.8 pts / match - AZ
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Go Ahead Eagles scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while AZ keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
AZ scores in 90% of matches (27 of 30 matches), while Go Ahead Eagles keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Go Ahead Eagles
Over / Under - AZ
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AZ is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Go Ahead Eagles · 1.4 pts / match - AZ
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Go Ahead Eagles - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
AZ - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Go Ahead Eagles
AZ
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Go Ahead Eagles | Liga | AZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.17 | 3.18 | • 3.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 63% | • 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 20% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Go Ahead Eagles 0 - 1 - 0 AZ. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Go Ahead Eagles vs AZ?
The Eredivisie match finished Go Ahead Eagles 0:0 AZ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Go Ahead Eagles vs AZ?
Go Ahead Eagles score 1.67 goals per game on average and AZ 1.73. The Eredivisie average is 3.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Go Ahead Eagles's matches and 63% of AZ's.
What form are Go Ahead Eagles and AZ in?
Over the last 5 games Go Ahead Eagles have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and AZ 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Go Ahead Eagles vs AZ?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


