Gorica vs Rudar: match statistics
Gorica vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gorica played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Gorica: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rudar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gorica scores 0.92 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.48 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gorica 60%, Rudar 52%. Over 2.5: Gorica 56%, Rudar 56%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Rudar has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.24. Gorica: 9.2 shots per match, Rudar: 9.9.
Match halves
Gorica: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.52. Rudar: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Gorica: 61-75 (5 goals). Rudar: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gorica sit 15th in the table, Rudar 8th, and the gap is clearest in attack: Rudar have scored 37 goals this season versus Gorica’s 23, with goal records of 31-37 compared to 38-23. At home Gorica have not won a match (0% home wins), recording 58% draws and 42% losses; they average 1.0 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per game, and in the last 5 they have 1 win and 4 losses (0.6 points per game on average). Rudar away have 25% wins, 25% draws and 50% losses, but are more effective in offense (37 goals this season) and in the last 5 they have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, conceding only 3 goals. xG shows 1.3 for Gorica versus 1.4 for Rudar, with Gorica at home allowing xG 1.27 while Rudar away allow 1.67; additionally Rudar have a higher shot conversion (13% vs 10%), giving them a qualitative edge. Considering the hosts’ high propensity to draw (58%), Gorica’s poor form over the last 5 and Rudar’s superior efficiency, I predict a draw as the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are mixed: Gorica records BTTS in 46% of home matches, while Rudar has BTTS in 58% of away matches, yielding a season average around 52%. However, the last 5 matches point clearly against both teams scoring simultaneously — Gorica had BTTS in 40% (2 of 5), and Rudar only 20% (1 of 5), so in this sample only about 30% of games ended BTTS. Rudar conceded an average of 0.6 goals in the last 5 matches (3 conceded), while Gorica conceded 1.6 goals (8 conceded); although Gorica generates higher xG (1.57 vs 1.40) and has better shot conversion (16% vs 13%), their form (4 losses and 1 win in last 5) weakens the attack. Additionally, Gorica keeps a clean sheet in 38% of home games, and the league averages 2.79 goals per match — taking into account Rudar's defensive stability and recent trends, this gives a stronger signal for 'No' on BTTS (65%) than for 'BTTS - Yes' (35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data analysis favors the Over market: Gorica scores on average 1.69 goals at home, while Rudar concedes an average of 1.50 goals away; home xG for Gorica is 1.57 versus 1.67 xG against for the visitors, yielding an estimated 1.62 goals for Gorica (average of 1.57 and 1.67). For Rudar the attacking xG is 1.40 and xG against Gorica is 1.40, nominally 1.40, but in the last 5 matches Rudar conceded only 0.6 goals on average, so I adjusted the visitors’ expected goals down to 1.33. The total expected goals sum to 2.95; at this level a Poisson distribution gives approximately a 79% probability of over 1.5 goals. Seasonal rates support this signal: Over 1.5 occurred in 69% of Gorica’s matches and 83% of Rudar’s matches; the 2.5 line has moderate backing (54% and 58%), while Over 3.5 is less likely (38% and 25%). Gorica attempts 4.92 shots on target on average with a 16% conversion, Rudar 3.67 with a 13% conversion, and the share of matches where both teams scored is 46% (Gorica) and 58% (Rudar) — this further strengthens the recommendation for Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at half-time: the home side were level at the break in 46% of their matches this season and in 60% of their last 5 games, while the away team were level at the break in 100% of their last 5. Scoring stats give Gorica a slight edge — goals per game 1.69 vs 1.25 for Rudar and xG 1.57 vs 1.40 — but first‑half goals are nearly equal (0.85 vs 0.82), so a small offensive difference does not necessarily decide the half. A full‑time draw also looks likely: Gorica have draws in 46% of their season fixtures, and Rudar drew 60% of their last 5 (form 'lwddd' includes 3 draws in 5), which weakens any clear win signal. Additionally, the visitors keep a clean sheet at half‑time in 82% of matches, and the hosts average 4.92 shots on target versus 3.67 for the visitors, showing a slight attacking advantage for the home side but not strong enough to rule out a draw. Therefore I rate the half‑time draw / full‑time draw (X/X) as the strongest scenario at about 34% probability, with an additional 12% for X/1 and 10% for X/2 stemming from the tendency for first‑half draws.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gorica | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rudar is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Gorica · 1.2 pts / match - Rudar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
0.92 goals / match - Gorica · 1.48 goals / match - Rudar
Rudar is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.52 goals / match - Gorica · 1.24 goals / match - Rudar
Gorica scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).
Rudar scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Gorica keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gorica
Over / Under - Rudar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudar is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Gorica · 1.52 pts / match - Rudar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gorica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 28%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gorica
Rudar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Gorica | Liga | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.79 | • 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 29% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- GoricaGoalTaj Rožič Šuligoj
- RudarGoalDominik Simic
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Gorica 0 - 0 - 1 Rudar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gorica vs Rudar?
The 2. SNL match finished Gorica 2:3 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gorica vs Rudar?
Gorica score 0.92 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.48. The 2. SNL average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Gorica's matches and 52% of Rudar's.
What form are Gorica and Rudar in?
Over the last 5 games Gorica have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rudar 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gorica vs Rudar?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gorica vs Rudar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


