Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów: match statistics
Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Górnik Łęczna played Chrobry Głogów in 1. Liga (Poland). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Górnik Łęczna: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chrobry Głogów: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Górnik Łęczna scores 1.19 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Chrobry Głogów scores 1.44 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Górnik Łęczna 70%, Chrobry Głogów 56%. Over 2.5: Górnik Łęczna 63%, Chrobry Głogów 52%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Chrobry Głogów has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.51. Górnik Łęczna: 12.9 shots per match, Chrobry Głogów: 13.5.
Match halves
Górnik Łęczna: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70. Chrobry Głogów: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Górnik Łęczna: 76-90+ (12 goals). Chrobry Głogów: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favourites are the visitors from Chrobry Głogów; the team sits 2nd in the table versus Górnik Łęczna’s 17th and has 13 wins this season compared with the hosts’ just 3. Defensive disparity is clear: Chrobry concedes 0.92 goals on average away, keeps 38% clean sheets and has conceded 26 goals this season, while Górnik at home concedes 1.57 on average, has only 21% clean sheets and 49 goals conceded. In attack the visitors score 1.38 goals on average away versus the hosts’ 1.00 at home, and a conversion rate of 11% vs 7% and share of matches without a goal 15% vs 29% indicate greater efficiency for Chrobry despite a similar number of on-target shots (4.15 vs 4.14). xG shows created chances are comparable (xG for 1.59 vs 1.55), but Chrobry’s advantage in defensive quality (xG against 1.51 vs 1.70) and better form over the last 5 matches (8 goals and 1.4 pts/match vs Górnik’s 7 goals and 1.0 pts/match) give them a real edge. Based on this I predict an away win; I assess Chrobry’s chances at ~60%, draw 25% and the home win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is strong: league-wide BTTS occurs in 66% of matches, and the season rates for the two teams are 57% (Górnik Łęczna) and 54% (Chrobry Głogów), providing a solid backdrop for a both-teams-to-score scenario. The last-5 trend reinforces this — Górnik has BTTS in 60% of its last 5 matches (avg. 1.4 scored and 1.6 conceded), and Chrobry in 80% (avg. 1.6 scored and 1.2 conceded), so both sides regularly score and concede. xG metrics indicate both teams create chances: xG for Górnik 1.71 vs 1.59 for Chrobry, with xG against 1.61 vs 1.51, meaning matches generate opportunities from both ends. Additionally, avg. on-target shots 5.14 (Górnik) and 4.15 (Chrobry) with a conversion rate of 11% translate to season goal averages of 1.5 and 1.38, while low clean sheet rates of 29% and 38% reduce the likelihood of one side keeping a clean sheet. Given the league goals average of 2.96 and that in the last 5 matches Górnik conceded 8 goals and Chrobry 6, I assess BTTS as more probable (72% vs 28%) and recommend a
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total xG is 1.71 (Górnik) + 1.59 (Chrobry) = 3.30, which in a simple Poisson model corresponds to roughly an 84% chance of Over 1.5 goals and about 64% chance of Over 2.5 goals. Seasonal stats confirm a strong signal for Over 1.5: Górnik has 86% such matches, Chrobry 77% (avg ~82%). Actual season goals average 1.50 + 1.38 = 2.88, slightly below xG, but the last 5 matches show an uptick for Over 2.5 (60% and 80%), so I adopt 64% for Over 2.5 as a compromise between xG and recent results. Over 3.5 is rare in the season (7% for Górnik, 15% for Chrobry ≈11%), so despite model outputs I lower its probability to 22%. Based on this, the strongest and most obvious market from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates the strongest signal is the scenario: away team leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2). After weighing seasonal data and current form, I derived an approximate half-time distribution: away leading ≈41%, draw ≈38%, home leading ≈21% (calculated from leadingAtHTPercentage_away 38% and leadingAtHTPercentage_home 29% plus the last five matches, where away teams led at the break in 60% vs 0% for hosts). If the away team leads at half-time, I assumed a probability of maintaining the lead and winning of ≈70%, yielding the away-leading-at-half and winning scenario ≈29% (41%*70%=28.7%); with a half-time draw the draw→away-win scenario I estimated at ≈17% (38%*45%=17.1%). Despite the home team having a slightly higher xG (1.71 vs 1.59 for the away side), the away team converts chances into results more effectively — they average 1.85 points per match versus 1.50 for the hosts and have a higher season win rate (54% vs 43%), which supports the 2/2 prediction.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Górnik Łęczna | Chrobry Głogów | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chrobry Głogów is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Górnik Łęczna · 1.4 pts / match - Chrobry Głogów
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chrobry Głogów is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Górnik Łęczna · 1.44 goals / match - Chrobry Głogów
Chrobry Głogów is 89% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.81 goals / match - Górnik Łęczna · 0.96 goals / match - Chrobry Głogów
Górnik Łęczna scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Chrobry Głogów keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
Chrobry Głogów scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Górnik Łęczna keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Górnik Łęczna
Over / Under - Chrobry Głogów
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chrobry Głogów is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Górnik Łęczna · 1.41 pts / match - Chrobry Głogów
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Górnik Łęczna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chrobry Głogów - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Górnik Łęczna
Chrobry Głogów
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Górnik Łęczna | Liga | Chrobry Głogów | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 2.96 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 66% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 19% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 80% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Górnik Łęczna 0 - 0 - 1 Chrobry Głogów. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów?
The 1. Liga match finished Górnik Łęczna 1:0 Chrobry Głogów. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów?
Górnik Łęczna score 1.19 goals per game on average and Chrobry Głogów 1.44. The 1. Liga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Górnik Łęczna's matches and 56% of Chrobry Głogów's.
What form are Górnik Łęczna and Chrobry Głogów in?
Over the last 5 games Górnik Łęczna have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chrobry Głogów 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Górnik Łęczna vs Chrobry Głogów: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


