Göztepe vs Antalyaspor: match statistics
Göztepe vs Antalyaspor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Göztepe played Antalyaspor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Göztepe: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Antalyaspor: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Göztepe scores 1.23 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Antalyaspor scores 1.00 and concedes 1.63. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Göztepe 43%, Antalyaspor 53%. Over 2.5: Göztepe 40%, Antalyaspor 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Göztepe has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.07. Göztepe: 13.5 shots per match, Antalyaspor: 9.2.
Match halves
Göztepe: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.70. Antalyaspor: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
Göztepe: 46-60 (8 goals). Antalyaspor: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Süper Lig: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back '1' — a Göztepe win. Göztepe averages 1.33 goals per home match and generates xG 1.55 with 14.33 shots (4.53 on target), while Antalyaspor away averages just 0.6 goals per match and xG 0.87 with 7.27 shots (2.8 on target), giving the hosts a clear advantage in chance creation. Antalyaspor fail to score in 60% of away matches and win only 20% on the road, whereas Göztepe at home record 40% wins, only 13% losses and 53% clean sheets; the difference is also visible in goal difference (+7 for hosts vs -7 for visitors). In the last 5 matches Göztepe have scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and average 1.2 points per match, while Antalyaspor have 6 goals and 0.8 points per match, although both teams have recently seen increased goals conceded (Göztepe 9 conceded in the last 5, Antalyaspor 10). Considering the xG advantage (1.55 vs 0.87), the number of shots on target (4.53 vs 2.8) and the high percentage of matches without a goal by the visitors, I set the probability distribution at 60% for the home team, 28% for a draw and 12% for the away team.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics favor a BTTS - Yes scenario: Göztepe posts a season BTTS of 80% vs Antalyaspor 27%, and in the last 5 matches the rates are 80% and 40% respectively. The home side creates significantly more chances (xG 1.26 vs 0.87, avg 11.2 shots vs 7.27 and 4.2 on target vs 2.8) and has higher efficiency (conversion 13% vs 8%), which increases total goals in their games. Antalyaspor’s season scoring average is only 0.6 with 60% of matches goalless for them, but they concede a lot (49 goals this season and 2.0 conceded in the last 5), so the hosts have a strong chance to score, and the visitors have shown in L5 they can reply (6 goals in L5, 1.2 per game). Additionally Göztepe rarely keeps a clean sheet (7% season CS) and in the last 5 matches both teams combined scored and conceded 9 goals, which supports BTTS. Considering this, I assign 62% to Yes and 38% to No, because the strong local BTTS signal (80%) and Antalyaspor’s high goals conceded outweigh the visitors’ season tendency to not score (60%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model yields expected goals of 1.47 for Göztepe (xG for 1.26 and xG against Antalyaspor 1.67 — average) and 1.17 for Antalyaspor (xG for 0.87 and xG against Göztepe 1.47), totaling 2.64 goals. A Poisson distribution with lambda=2.64 gives about a 74% probability of Over 1.5 goals and about 49% for Over 2.5 goals, indicating a clear edge on the Over 1.5 market. Seasonal stats reinforce this signal: Göztepe has 100% of home matches Over 1.5 and 80% Over 2.5 at home, while Antalyaspor away records only 33% Over 1.5 and 27% Over 2.5, so the onus of goal creation is on the home side. Additionally, Göztepe averages 11.2 shots and 4.2 on target with a 13% conversion, versus Antalyaspor’s 7.27 shots and 2.8 on target with an 8% conversion, increasing the home team’s chance of creating scoring opportunities. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest and most likely bet, with moderate support for Over 2.5 and low confidence in Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict Göztepe will lead at the break but the match will finish level (1/X). The hosts led at half-time in 33% of matches overall and in 40% of their last five, scoring an average of 0.67 goals by half-time versus Antalyaspor’s 0.2; their attacking xG is 1.26 compared to the opponents’ 0.87, and their average on-target shots are 4.2 versus 2.8. However, Göztepe concedes heavily after the break — an average of 1.47 second-half goals; 93% of their games see at least one goal in the second half, and despite having 53% clean sheets at half-time they only have 7% clean sheets for full games this season, indicating they tend to lose leads. Antalyaspor record 40% season clean sheets and concede on average 1.07 goals per match, so they have a realistic chance to equalize after the interval. Therefore the strongest signal is a home lead at half-time and a draw at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Göztepe | Antalyaspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Göztepe is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Göztepe · 0.8 pts / match - Antalyaspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Göztepe is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Göztepe · 1 goals / match - Antalyaspor
Göztepe is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.9 goals / match - Göztepe · 1.63 goals / match - Antalyaspor
Göztepe scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Antalyaspor keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
Antalyaspor scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Göztepe keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Göztepe
Over / Under - Antalyaspor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Göztepe is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Göztepe · 1.07 pts / match - Antalyaspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Göztepe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Antalyaspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Göztepe
Antalyaspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).
Teams vs league
| Göztepe | Liga | Antalyaspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.62 | • 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 52% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 27% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 66% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Göztepe 1 - 0 - 0 Antalyaspor. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Göztepe vs Antalyaspor?
The Süper Lig match finished Göztepe 2:0 Antalyaspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Göztepe vs Antalyaspor?
Göztepe score 1.23 goals per game on average and Antalyaspor 1.00. The Süper Lig average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Göztepe's matches and 53% of Antalyaspor's.
What form are Göztepe and Antalyaspor in?
Over the last 5 games Göztepe have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Antalyaspor 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Göztepe vs Antalyaspor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Göztepe vs Antalyaspor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


