Grasshopper vs Basel: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper played Basel in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Basel: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.38 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Basel scores 1.69 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.38 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 62%, Basel 54%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 69%, Basel 69%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 74%.

xG, shots and style

Basel has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.46. Grasshopper: 13.1 shots per match, Basel: 17.5.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77. Basel: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 61-75 (5 goals). Basel: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.38 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 74%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
GrasshopperBasel
14Shots19
GrasshopperBasel
5Shots on target5
GrasshopperBasel
1.58xG2
GrasshopperBasel
4Corners4
GrasshopperBasel
48Dangerous attacks62
GrasshopperBasel
18Fouls17
GrasshopperBasel
5Cards2
GrasshopperBasel

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1.69
GrasshopperBasel
2.08Goals conceded / match1.23
GrasshopperBasel
44%Average possession56%
GrasshopperBasel
4.69Shots on target / match6
GrasshopperBasel

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.08Shots per match17.54
GrasshopperBasel
4.69Shots on target6
GrasshopperBasel
10.6%Shot conversion9.6%
GrasshopperBasel
44%Possession56%
GrasshopperBasel
1.46xG for1.88
GrasshopperBasel
1.63xG against1.51
GrasshopperBasel

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedBasel: Dominant
GrasshopperBasel
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Basel is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.4 pts / match - Basel

Grasshopper
LLDLW
Season result split
23% W31% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Basel
WLWDL
Season result split
54% W8% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Basel is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.69 goals / match - Basel

Basel is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.08 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.23 goals / match - Basel

Grasshopper scoring profile: strong

Grasshopper scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Basel keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

Basel scoring profile: very strong

Basel scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

18Goals scored (season)22
GrasshopperBasel
27Goals conceded (season)16
GrasshopperBasel
3.46Average goals in match2.92
GrasshopperBasel
4Goals scored (last 5)6
GrasshopperBasel
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
GrasshopperBasel

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal85%
GrasshopperBasel
38%2 goals46%
GrasshopperBasel
23%3 goals31%
GrasshopperBasel
0%4 goals8%
GrasshopperBasel

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal62%
GrasshopperBasel
54%2 goals31%
GrasshopperBasel
31%3 goals15%
GrasshopperBasel
15%4 goals8%
GrasshopperBasel

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time8%
GrasshopperBasel
8%BTTS in both halves0%
GrasshopperBasel
31%Scored in both halves38%
GrasshopperBasel

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
GrasshopperBasel
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
GrasshopperBasel
20%BTTS - last 520%
GrasshopperBasel

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
GrasshopperBasel
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
GrasshopperBasel
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
GrasshopperBasel

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
GrasshopperBasel
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
GrasshopperBasel
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
GrasshopperBasel

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Basel is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.85 pts / match - Basel

Grasshopper - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Basel - half-time state
54% leading23% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)1.85
GrasshopperBasel
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.92
GrasshopperBasel
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
GrasshopperBasel
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.46
GrasshopperBasel
62%Clean sheet before half-time69%
GrasshopperBasel
54%No goal before half-time38%
GrasshopperBasel

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1.23
GrasshopperBasel
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
GrasshopperBasel
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
GrasshopperBasel
2.08Average goals (2nd half)1.46
GrasshopperBasel
15%Clean sheet after half-time46%
GrasshopperBasel
38%No goal after half-time38%
GrasshopperBasel

Grasshopper - second-half results

23% W15% D62% L
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Basel - second-half results

23% W54% D23% L
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.41.6
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Basel - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
5
11
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Basel
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Basel

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaBasel
Average goals in match 3.463.38 2.92
Both teams scored 62%65% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%74% 69%
Clean sheets 15%19% 38%
Goal before half-time 69%75% 85%
Goal after half-time 100%86% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.38
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / match
1.46
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrasshopperYellow cardSamuel Marques
  2. BaselSubstitutionOn: Albian Afrim AjetiOff: Moritz Broschinski
  3. BaselYellow cardAndrej Bačanin
  4. GrasshopperYellow cardSimone Stroscio
  5. BaselYellow cardAndrej Bačanin
  6. BaselSubstitutionOn: Koba Lein KoindrediOff: Xherdan Shaqiri
  7. GrasshopperYellow cardSamuel Marques
  8. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Allan ArigoniOff: Maximilian Ullmann
  9. GrasshopperYellow cardAllan Arigoni
  10. GrasshopperYellow cardSimone Stroscio
  11. BaselSubstitutionOn: Marin ŠotičekOff: Keigo Tsunemoto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Luca PiccoloMatches officiated: 15
6Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 240%Home wins27%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grasshopper 0 - 0 - 1 Basel. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Basel 1893
2 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Basel?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:1 Basel. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Basel?

Grasshopper score 1.38 goals per game on average and Basel 1.69. The Super League average is 3.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Grasshopper's matches and 54% of Basel's.

What form are Grasshopper and Basel in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Basel 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Basel?

The statistical background for Grasshopper vs Basel — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.