Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Grasshopper vs Lugano: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Lugano crest
Lugano
125%(3.24)
X20%(3.64)
255%(2.00)

Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.

Grasshopper vs Lugano: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Lugano in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Lugano: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Lugano scores 1.55 and concedes 1.11. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 61%, Lugano 61%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Lugano 47%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Lugano has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.41. Grasshopper: 12.5 shots per match, Lugano: 13.3.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66. Lugano: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). Lugano: 61-75 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

34Possession (%)66
GrasshopperLugano
11Shots14
GrasshopperLugano
5Shots on target7
GrasshopperLugano
1.3xG1.69
GrasshopperLugano
3Corners6
GrasshopperLugano
34Dangerous attacks42
GrasshopperLugano
16Fouls12
GrasshopperLugano
2Cards4
GrasshopperLugano

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.55
GrasshopperLugano
1.95Goals conceded / match1.11
GrasshopperLugano
45%Average possession56%
GrasshopperLugano
4.34Shots on target / match4.82
GrasshopperLugano

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match13.26
GrasshopperLugano
4.34Shots on target4.82
GrasshopperLugano
10.1%Shot conversion11.7%
GrasshopperLugano
45%Possession56%
GrasshopperLugano
1.41xG for1.49
GrasshopperLugano
1.62xG against1.53
GrasshopperLugano

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedLugano: Balanced
GrasshopperLugano
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lugano is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper · 2 pts / match - Lugano

Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Lugano
WWLDW
Season result split
50% W26% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-10-9
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-7-5
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lugano is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.55 goals / match - Lugano

Lugano is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.11 goals / match - Lugano

Grasshopper scoring profile: strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Lugano keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

Lugano scoring profile: very strong

Lugano scores in 89% of matches (34 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)59
GrasshopperLugano
74Goals conceded (season)42
GrasshopperLugano
3.21Average goals in match2.66
GrasshopperLugano
8Goals scored (last 5)9
GrasshopperLugano
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
GrasshopperLugano

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal89%
GrasshopperLugano
29%2 goals32%
GrasshopperLugano
18%3 goals18%
GrasshopperLugano
3%4 goals13%
GrasshopperLugano

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal68%
GrasshopperLugano
53%2 goals29%
GrasshopperLugano
26%3 goals11%
GrasshopperLugano
16%4 goals3%
GrasshopperLugano

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time16%
GrasshopperLugano
11%BTTS in both halves5%
GrasshopperLugano
24%Scored in both halves24%
GrasshopperLugano

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
GrasshopperLugano
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
GrasshopperLugano
80%BTTS - last 540%
GrasshopperLugano

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
GrasshopperLugano
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
GrasshopperLugano
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
GrasshopperLugano

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
GrasshopperLugano
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
GrasshopperLugano
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
GrasshopperLugano

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lugano is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.47 pts / match - Lugano

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Lugano - half-time state
34% leading45% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.47
GrasshopperLugano
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.68
GrasshopperLugano
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
GrasshopperLugano
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.08
GrasshopperLugano
45%Clean sheet before half-time63%
GrasshopperLugano
55%No goal before half-time55%
GrasshopperLugano

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.61
GrasshopperLugano
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
GrasshopperLugano
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
GrasshopperLugano
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.58
GrasshopperLugano
29%Clean sheet after half-time47%
GrasshopperLugano
50%No goal after half-time32%
GrasshopperLugano

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lugano - second-half results

45% W26% R29% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lugano - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Lugano
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
6
4
16-30
11
4
31-45
10
5
46-60
14
13
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Lugano

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaLugano
Average goals in match 3.213.29 2.66
Both teams scored 61%66% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%67% 47%
Clean sheets 13%19% 32%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 66%
Goal after half-time 84%85% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Grasshopper 1 - 0 - 1 Lugano. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Grasshopper Club Zürich
1 : 0
FC Lugano
FC Lugano
2 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Lugano?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:1 Lugano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Lugano?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 1, Lugano won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Lugano?

Grasshopper score 1.26 goals per game on average and Lugano 1.55. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Grasshopper's matches and 61% of Lugano's.

What form are Grasshopper and Lugano in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Lugano 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Lugano?

The statistical background for Grasshopper vs Lugano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.