Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Grasshopper vs Lugano: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Lugano crest
Lugano
125%(3.24)
X20%(3.64)
255%(2.00)

Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.

Grasshopper vs Lugano: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper played Lugano in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lugano: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.33 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Lugano scores 1.76 and concedes 1.24. League average: 3.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 62%, Lugano 57%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 57%, Lugano 57%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Lugano has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.46. Grasshopper: 12.9 shots per match, Lugano: 13.8.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Lugano: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 31-45+ (6 goals). Lugano: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.35 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lugano is in significantly better form than Grasshopper, as evidenced by 4 wins in their last 5 matches and a high PPG of 2.4. The hosts are only in 11th place in the table with just a 20% home win rate and a negative streak (only 1 win in their last 5 matches). Lugano, as the league's second-placed team, boasts a 50% away win rate and an advantage in possession (58% vs 47%), indicating control of the game. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.67 vs 1.45) and scoring statistics (Lugano with 37 goals this season vs Grasshopper's 28) further confirm the visitors' advantage. Considering the hosts' poor form, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per match at home, and Lugano's solid performance, an away win is expected.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

34Possession (%)66
GrasshopperLugano
11Shots14
GrasshopperLugano
5Shots on target7
GrasshopperLugano
1.3xG1.69
GrasshopperLugano
3Corners6
GrasshopperLugano
34Dangerous attacks42
GrasshopperLugano
16Fouls12
GrasshopperLugano
2Cards4
GrasshopperLugano

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.76
GrasshopperLugano
1.86Goals conceded / match1.24
GrasshopperLugano
45%Average possession56%
GrasshopperLugano
4.57Shots on target / match4.81
GrasshopperLugano

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.86Shots per match13.81
GrasshopperLugano
4.57Shots on target4.81
GrasshopperLugano
10.4%Shot conversion12.8%
GrasshopperLugano
45%Possession56%
GrasshopperLugano
1.46xG for1.52
GrasshopperLugano
1.61xG against1.59
GrasshopperLugano

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedLugano: Balanced
GrasshopperLugano
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lugano is 275% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grasshopper · 3 pts / match - Lugano

Grasshopper
LWLLD
Season result split
19% W29% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-11
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Lugano
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-6
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lugano is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.76 goals / match - Lugano

Lugano is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.24 goals / match - Lugano

Grasshopper scoring profile: strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Lugano keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

Lugano scoring profile: very strong

Lugano scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).

28Goals scored (season)37
GrasshopperLugano
39Goals conceded (season)26
GrasshopperLugano
3.19Average goals in match3
GrasshopperLugano
9Goals scored (last 5)17
GrasshopperLugano
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
GrasshopperLugano

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
GrasshopperLugano
29%2 goals38%
GrasshopperLugano
19%3 goals29%
GrasshopperLugano
5%4 goals19%
GrasshopperLugano

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal67%
GrasshopperLugano
48%2 goals38%
GrasshopperLugano
24%3 goals14%
GrasshopperLugano
10%4 goals5%
GrasshopperLugano

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
GrasshopperLugano
10%BTTS in both halves10%
GrasshopperLugano
24%Scored in both halves24%
GrasshopperLugano

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
GrasshopperLugano
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
GrasshopperLugano
80%BTTS - last 560%
GrasshopperLugano

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
GrasshopperLugano
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
GrasshopperLugano
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
GrasshopperLugano

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
GrasshopperLugano
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
GrasshopperLugano
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
GrasshopperLugano

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lugano is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.71 pts / match - Lugano

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading38% draw33% trailing
Lugano - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.71
GrasshopperLugano
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.95
GrasshopperLugano
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
GrasshopperLugano
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.38
GrasshopperLugano
43%Clean sheet before half-time62%
GrasshopperLugano
57%No goal before half-time43%
GrasshopperLugano

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.43
GrasshopperLugano
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
GrasshopperLugano
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
GrasshopperLugano
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.62
GrasshopperLugano
29%Clean sheet after half-time38%
GrasshopperLugano
48%No goal after half-time48%
GrasshopperLugano

Grasshopper - second-half results

19% W38% D43% L
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lugano - second-half results

38% W29% D33% L
36
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lugano - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.20
Goals scored / match2.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match2.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+9+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
2
9
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
5
46-60
6
12
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Lugano
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
3
31-45
5
4
46-60
8
8
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Lugano

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaLugano
Average goals in match 3.193.35 3.00
Both teams scored 62%66% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%68% 57%
Clean sheets 10%19% 33%
Goal before half-time 76%76% 71%
Goal after half-time 81%83% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.35
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LuganoSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Belhaj MahmoudOff: Hannes Delcroix
  2. GrasshopperYellow cardAbdoulaye Diaby
  3. LuganoYellow cardKevin Behrens
  4. LuganoGoalRenato Steffen
  5. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Tim MeyerOff: Lovro Zvonarek
  6. LuganoSubstitutionOn: Zachary Brault-GuillardOff: Hicham Mahou
  7. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Óscar Clemente MuesOff: Michael Frey
  8. GrasshopperGoalSamuel KrasniqiAssist: Jonathan Asp Jensen
  9. LuganoYellow cardMattia Zanotti
  10. GrasshopperYellow cardJonathan Asp Jensen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Sandro SchärerMatches officiated: 9
4.89Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 211%Home wins67%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grasshopper 0 - 0 - 1 Lugano. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Lugano
2 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Lugano?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:1 Lugano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Lugano?

Grasshopper score 1.33 goals per game on average and Lugano 1.76. The Super League average is 3.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Grasshopper's matches and 57% of Lugano's.

What form are Grasshopper and Lugano in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lugano 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Lugano?

The statistical background for Grasshopper vs Lugano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.