Grasshopper vs Servette: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper played Servette in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 6 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Grasshopper: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Servette: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.27 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. Servette scores 1.73 and concedes 2.07. League average: 3.32 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 60%, Servette 73%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 60%, Servette 80%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Servette has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.44. Grasshopper: 12.7 shots per match, Servette: 15.2.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Servette: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 61-75 (5 goals). Servette: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.32 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
GrasshopperServette
14Shots7
GrasshopperServette
1Shots on target1
GrasshopperServette
1.41xG0.8
GrasshopperServette
7Corners3
GrasshopperServette
63Dangerous attacks39
GrasshopperServette
15Fouls10
GrasshopperServette
1Cards2
GrasshopperServette

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GrasshopperServette
1.27Goals scored / match1.73
GrasshopperServette
1.93Goals conceded / match2.07
GrasshopperServette
44%Average possession52%
GrasshopperServette
4.53Shots on target / match4.87
GrasshopperServette

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match15.2
GrasshopperServette
4.53Shots on target4.87
GrasshopperServette
9.9%Shot conversion11.4%
GrasshopperServette
44%Possession52%
GrasshopperServette
1.44xG for1.66
GrasshopperServette
1.66xG against1.53
GrasshopperServette

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedServette: Attacking
GrasshopperServette
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper
DLWDL
Season result split
20% W33% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-7
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Servette
WLLDD
Season result split
27% W27% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Servette is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.73 goals / match - Servette

Grasshopper is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.93 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2.07 goals / match - Servette

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

19Goals scored (season)26
GrasshopperServette
29Goals conceded (season)31
GrasshopperServette
3.2Average goals in match3.8
GrasshopperServette
5Goals scored (last 5)11
GrasshopperServette
11Goals conceded (last 5)12
GrasshopperServette

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal87%
GrasshopperServette
33%2 goals53%
GrasshopperServette
20%3 goals20%
GrasshopperServette
0%4 goals13%
GrasshopperServette

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
GrasshopperServette
47%2 goals60%
GrasshopperServette
27%3 goals40%
GrasshopperServette
13%4 goals20%
GrasshopperServette

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time33%
GrasshopperServette
7%BTTS in both halves7%
GrasshopperServette
27%Scored in both halves27%
GrasshopperServette

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
GrasshopperServette
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
GrasshopperServette
40%BTTS - last 580%
GrasshopperServette

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
GrasshopperServette
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
GrasshopperServette
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
GrasshopperServette

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GrasshopperServette
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
GrasshopperServette
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
GrasshopperServette

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Grasshopper · 0.73 pts / match - Servette

Grasshopper - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing
Servette - half-time state
13% leading33% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)0.73
GrasshopperServette
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.53
GrasshopperServette
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
GrasshopperServette
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.73
GrasshopperServette
53%Clean sheet before half-time33%
GrasshopperServette
53%No goal before half-time53%
GrasshopperServette

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per match (2nd half)1.67
GrasshopperServette
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
GrasshopperServette
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
GrasshopperServette
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.07
GrasshopperServette
27%Clean sheet after half-time40%
GrasshopperServette
47%No goal after half-time33%
GrasshopperServette

Grasshopper - second-half results

20% W27% R53% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Servette - second-half results

53% W7% R40% P
11
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding208%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Servette - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.43.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
6
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
5
11
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Servette
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaServette
Average goals in match 3.203.32 3.80
Both teams scored 60%66% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%71% 80%
Clean sheets 13%19% 13%
Goal before half-time 73%76% 80%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.32
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.87
Home goals / match
1.46
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ServetteGoalSteve RouillerAssist: Timothé Cognat
  2. GrasshopperYellow cardTim Meyer
  3. ServetteYellow cardJeremy Bruno Guillemenot
  4. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Joel MallOff: Jeremy Frick
  5. ServetteYellow cardBradley Mazikou
  6. ServetteSubstitutionOn: David DoulineOff: Jeremy Bruno Guillemenot
  7. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Malek IshuayedOff: Giotto Morandi
  8. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Samuel MrázOff: Florian Ayé
  9. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Loris GiandomenicoOff: Maximilian Ullmann

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grasshopper 0 - 1 - 0 Servette. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Servette FC
1 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Servette?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 0:1 Servette. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Servette?

Grasshopper score 1.27 goals per game on average and Servette 1.73. The Super League average is 3.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Grasshopper's matches and 73% of Servette's.

What form are Grasshopper and Servette in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Servette 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Servette?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Servette: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.