Grasshopper vs Thun: match statistics
Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.
Grasshopper vs Thun: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Grasshopper played Thun in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Grasshopper: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Thun: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Grasshopper scores 1.37 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Thun scores 2.05 and concedes 1.21. League average: 3.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Grasshopper 58%, Thun 68%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Thun 74%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Thun has higher xG: 1.99 vs 1.51. Grasshopper: 13.3 shots per match, Thun: 18.7.
Match halves
Grasshopper: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68. Thun: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.11.
Goals by minute
Grasshopper: 31-45+ (6 goals). Thun: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.27 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Grasshopper | Thun | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Thun is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.8 pts / match - Thun
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.37 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2.05 goals / match - Thun
Thun is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.84 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.21 goals / match - Thun
Grasshopper scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
Thun scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grasshopper
Over / Under - Thun
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Thun is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.58 pts / match - Thun
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Thun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Grasshopper
Thun
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Grasshopper | Liga | Thun | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.21 | 3.27 | • 3.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 68% | ▲ 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Grasshopper 0 - 1 - 0 Thun. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Grasshopper vs Thun?
The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:3 Thun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Thun?
Grasshopper score 1.37 goals per game on average and Thun 2.05. The Super League average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Grasshopper's matches and 68% of Thun's.
What form are Grasshopper and Thun in?
Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Thun 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Thun?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.