France - Ligue 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont: match statistics

Grenoble Foot 38 crest
Grenoble Foot 38
2 : 2half-time 2:1
Clermont crest
Clermont

Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grenoble Foot 38 play Clermont in Ligue 2 (France). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Grenoble Foot 38: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Clermont: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grenoble Foot 38 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Clermont scores 1.12 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grenoble Foot 38 56%, Clermont 59%. Over 2.5: Grenoble Foot 38 38%, Clermont 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Grenoble Foot 38 has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.17. Grenoble Foot 38: 10.0 shots per match, Clermont: 10.7.

Match halves

Grenoble Foot 38: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53. Clermont: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Grenoble Foot 38: 76-90+ (14 goals). Clermont: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1). Grenoble concedes an average of 0.79 goals per home match and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of appearances, while Clermont concedes 1.57 goals away and keeps a clean sheet in only 29% of away games. Grenoble produces higher xG at home — 1.27 versus Clermont’s 1.00 on the road — and averages 11.38 shots (3.69 on target) per match compared to Clermont’s 9.43 shots (2.71 on target), indicating superior chance creation. However, the hosts are less efficient in finishing: Grenoble scores only 0.71 goals per home match and fails to score in 43% of games, whereas Clermont averages 1.07 goals away and posts a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 7%). Form is mixed — Clermont has 2 wins in the last 5 and averages 1.2 points over that span, while Grenoble is winless in the last 5 with 0.6 points — but the high proportion of home draws (57% draws at home) increases the likelihood of a share of points. Summing up Grenoble’s better defensive record at home, the xG advantage and superior chance volumes, I expect a narrow Grenoble victory, hence probabilities of 45% home, 35% draw and 20% away.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
9Shots14
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
2Shots on target6
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
1.01xG1.49
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3Corners4
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
40Dangerous attacks25
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
12Fouls14
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
2Cards2
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.97Goals scored / match1.12
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
1.15Goals conceded / match1.29
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
44%Average possession50%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3.59Shots on target / match3.35
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.03Shots per match10.68
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3.59Shots on target3.35
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
9.7%Shot conversion10.5%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
44%Possession50%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
1.19xG for1.17
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
1.57xG against1.44
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Shooting quality

Grenoble Foot 38: BalancedClermont: Balanced
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grenoble Foot 38
DLDWW
Season result split
24% W44% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-11
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Clermont
DLDWW
Season result split
26% W29% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-9
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clermont is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38 · 1.12 goals / match - Clermont

Grenoble Foot 38 is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38 · 1.29 goals / match - Clermont

Grenoble Foot 38 scoring profile: very strong

Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Clermont scoring profile: strong

Clermont scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

33Goals scored (season)38
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
39Goals conceded (season)44
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
2.12Average goals in match2.41
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal71%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
21%2 goals32%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
6%3 goals6%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3%4 goals3%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal82%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
32%2 goals32%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
12%3 goals9%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0%4 goals6%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Grenoble Foot 38 - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 34 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time21%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
12%Scored in both halves9%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
60%BTTS - last 560%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grenoble Foot 38 is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Grenoble Foot 38 · 1.12 pts / match - Clermont

Grenoble Foot 38 - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing
Clermont - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.12
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.76Average goals (1st half)1.06
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
68%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
68%No goal before half-time68%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.35
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
44%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont
53%No goal after half-time53%
Grenoble Foot 38Clermont

Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results

21% W44% R35% P
45
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clermont - second-half results

32% W29% R38% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grenoble Foot 38 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grenoble Foot 38
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
14
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
9
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grenoble Foot 38

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

Grenoble Foot 38LigaClermont
Average goals in match 2.122.53 2.41
Both teams scored 56%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%47% 47%
Clean sheets 29%30% 18%
Goal before half-time 53%67% 56%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grenoble Foot 38 0 - 0 - 1 Clermont. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Clermont Foot 63
2 : 1
Grenoble Foot 38

FAQ

What was the result of Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont?

The Ligue 2 match finished Grenoble Foot 38 2:2 Clermont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont?

Grenoble Foot 38 score 0.97 goals per game on average and Clermont 1.12. The Ligue 2 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Grenoble Foot 38's matches and 59% of Clermont's.

What form are Grenoble Foot 38 and Clermont in?

Over the last 5 games Grenoble Foot 38 have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Clermont 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont?

The statistical background for Grenoble Foot 38 vs Clermont — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.