Grimsby Town vs Salford City: match statistics
Grimsby Town vs Salford City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Grimsby Town played Salford City in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Grimsby Town: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Salford City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Grimsby Town scores 1.61 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Salford City scores 1.33 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Grimsby Town 50%, Salford City 48%. Over 2.5: Grimsby Town 48%, Salford City 43%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Grimsby Town has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.59. Grimsby Town: 13.8 shots per match, Salford City: 13.7.
Match halves
Grimsby Town: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.76. Salford City: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Grimsby Town: 31-45+ (19 goals). Salford City: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Grimsby are the favorites due to clear home advantages in key metrics: the hosts have scored 74 goals this season and average 1.78 goals per home match versus Salford’s 1.17 goals on the road. Grimsby also show superior home defence – conceding 0.96 goals per match and keeping 39% clean sheets, while Salford concede 1.17 away and record only 22% clean sheets. In chance creation the hosts dominate: 15.87 shots and 5.65 on target per match, with average home xG 1.83 versus the visitors’ xG 1.43, and a probability of failing to score of 17% compared to 35% for Salford. Form reinforces Grimsby’s edge – 2 points per match in the last 5 games versus Salford’s 1.6, and although the visitors have 25 wins this season versus the hosts’ 22, Salford suffer 43% defeats away. I therefore expect an attacking display from the hosts and a Grimsby win, although Salford remain dangerous and can force a draw on the counter.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally both teams have BTTS at 48% (Grimsby 48%, Salford 48%), while the league average is 53%, slightly favoring a scenario where both teams score. xG analysis indicates both sides have scoring potential: Grimsby’s average xG is 1.75 versus xG against Salford 1.38 (+0.37), and Salford’s xG is 1.43 versus xG against Grimsby 1.24 (+0.19); additionally Grimsby averages 5.09 shots on target compared to Salford’s 3.91. Grimsby have scored 74 and conceded 50 this season, Salford have scored 61 and conceded 51, demonstrating both teams can find the net. Countering this is Salford’s form over the last 5 matches: only 20% BTTS and an average of 0.8 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, plus a high percentage of clean sheets for Grimsby at 43% on the season, which reduces certainty that both teams will score. Weighing the signals (strong Grimsby attack and xG plus 12 scored and 5 conceded in the last 5 matches) I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% versus 38% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are estimated at 1.57 for Grimsby Town and 1.34 for Salford City, totaling 2.91 goals; calculation based on the average of team's attacking xG and opponent's defensive xG: (1.75 + 1.38)/2 ≈ 1.57 and (1.43 + 1.24)/2 ≈ 1.34. Season over-1.5 shares are 61% for the home side and 65% for the away side (average 63%), so I assign Over 1.5 a 66% probability as the strongest signal. On the 2.5 line both teams have 43% of matches over 2.5 seasonally, but Grimsby in the last 5 matches recorded 80% over 2.5 and scored 12 goals in those 5 matches (2.4 per game), which raises the Over 2.5 probability to 58%. Over 3.5 is less likely: seasonal values are 30% (home) and 22% (away), and Grimsby scored more than 3 goals in only 9% of matches while Salford in 0%, hence Over 3.5 only 24%. Additionally Grimsby averages 5.09 shots on target versus Salford's 3.91 and has higher xG (1.75 vs 1.43), which strengthens the goals signal and justifies recommending Over 1.5 as the best pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grimsby are the favorites: seasonally they score on average 1.48 goals per match with an xG of 1.75 and collect on average 2.0 points per home match, versus Salford — 1.17 goals, xG 1.43 and 1.52 points per match. At half-time the statistics also favor the hosts — Grimsby average 0.57 goals and concede 0.35 by the break, and 78% of their home matches are clean halves; in the last 5 fixtures the hosts led at the break in 60% and had 10 goals by half-time, while Salford had 3. Offensively Grimsby average 15.0 shots and 5.09 shots on target per match compared to 12.43 and 3.91 for Salford, which together with the higher xG (1.75 vs 1.43) increases their chance to control the game and maintain a lead. Although both teams have a similar share of matches where both teams scored (48% seasonally), the first-half profile and the hosts’ statistical advantage point to a scenario of Grimsby leading at the break and winning by full-time. Therefore I assign 1/1 the highest probability (40%), with alternatives X/1 18% and X/X 14% as the next most realistic scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Grimsby Town | Salford City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Grimsby Town is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Grimsby Town · 1.6 pts / match - Salford City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Grimsby Town is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.61 goals / match - Grimsby Town · 1.33 goals / match - Salford City
Grimsby Town scores in 83% of matches (38 of 46 matches), while Salford City keeps a clean sheet in 33% (15 of 46 matches).
Salford City scores in 72% of matches (33 of 46 matches), while Grimsby Town keeps a clean sheet in 37% (17 of 46 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grimsby Town
Over / Under - Salford City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grimsby Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Salford City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Grimsby Town
Salford City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Grimsby Town | Liga | Salford City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.70 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 48% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 67% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Grimsby Town 2 - 0 - 0 Salford City. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Grimsby Town vs Salford City?
The EFL League Two match finished Grimsby Town 1:2 Salford City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby Town and Salford City?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Grimsby Town won 2, Salford City won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Grimsby Town vs Salford City?
Grimsby Town score 1.61 goals per game on average and Salford City 1.33. The EFL League Two average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Grimsby Town's matches and 48% of Salford City's.
What form are Grimsby Town and Salford City in?
Over the last 5 games Grimsby Town have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Salford City 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grimsby Town vs Salford City?
The statistical background for Grimsby Town vs Salford City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


