Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 23 July 2026

Grobiņa vs Auda: match statistics

Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Auda crest
Auda
155%(2.75)
X30%(3.20)
215%(2.25)

Grobiņa shows significantly better form over their last five matches, securing 1.8 points per game with a record of two wins and three draws, remaining undefeated. The hosts demonstrate defensive solidity, conceding merely 3 goals in their last five outings. Auda, on the other hand, is in a clear slump, picking up only 0.8 points per game and suffering three defeats in their last five matches. The visitors have major defensive issues, leaking 9 goals in this period, which highlights a crucial vulnerability. Considering Grobiņa's superiority in form, the home-field advantage, and Auda's poor defensive setup, the hosts are clear favorites for this clash. A draw is also possible given Grobiņa's tendency to share points in recent matches.

Grobiņa vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grobiņa play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Grobiņa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grobiņa scores 0.65 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grobiņa 35%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 22%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.16. Grobiņa: 9.2 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.

Match halves

Grobiņa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.26. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-2-4. Average goals 2.83, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Grobiņa shows significantly better form over their last five matches, securing 1.8 points per game with a record of two wins and three draws, remaining undefeated. The hosts demonstrate defensive solidity, conceding merely 3 goals in their last five outings. Auda, on the other hand, is in a clear slump, picking up only 0.8 points per game and suffering three defeats in their last five matches. The visitors have major defensive issues, leaking 9 goals in this period, which highlights a crucial vulnerability. Considering Grobiņa's superiority in form, the home-field advantage, and Auda's poor defensive setup, the hosts are clear favorites for this clash. A draw is also possible given Grobiņa's tendency to share points in recent matches.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
GrobiņaAuda
6Shots21
GrobiņaAuda
1Shots on target10
GrobiņaAuda
0.67xG2.39
GrobiņaAuda
2Corners8
GrobiņaAuda
29Dangerous attacks51
GrobiņaAuda
15Fouls17
GrobiņaAuda
1Cards4
GrobiņaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.65Goals scored / match1.68
GrobiņaAuda
1.52Goals conceded / match1.18
GrobiņaAuda
42%Average possession60%
GrobiņaAuda
3Shots on target / match4.68
GrobiņaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.22Shots per match13.23
GrobiņaAuda
3Shots on target4.68
GrobiņaAuda
7.1%Shot conversion12.7%
GrobiņaAuda
42%Possession60%
GrobiņaAuda
1.16xG for1.63
GrobiņaAuda
1.6xG against1.13
GrobiņaAuda

Shooting quality

Grobiņa: BalancedAuda: Balanced
GrobiņaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1 pts / match - Auda

Grobiņa
LDLWL
Season result split
17% W35% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-11
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Auda
LWDLD
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 158% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.68 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.18 goals / match - Auda

Grobiņa scoring profile: mixed

Grobiņa scores in 48% of matches (11 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)37
GrobiņaAuda
35Goals conceded (season)26
GrobiņaAuda
2.17Average goals in match2.86
GrobiņaAuda
3Goals scored (last 5)4
GrobiņaAuda
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
GrobiņaAuda

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal86%
GrobiņaAuda
9%2 goals50%
GrobiņaAuda
9%3 goals14%
GrobiņaAuda
0%4 goals5%
GrobiņaAuda

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal68%
GrobiņaAuda
39%2 goals32%
GrobiņaAuda
17%3 goals14%
GrobiņaAuda
4%4 goals5%
GrobiņaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
GrobiņaAuda
4%BTTS in both halves0%
GrobiņaAuda
9%Scored in both halves36%
GrobiņaAuda

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
GrobiņaAuda
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
GrobiņaAuda
20%BTTS - last 540%
GrobiņaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
GrobiņaAuda
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
GrobiņaAuda
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
GrobiņaAuda

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
GrobiņaAuda
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
GrobiņaAuda
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
GrobiņaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.45 pts / match - Auda

Grobiņa - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing
Auda - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.45
GrobiņaAuda
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.77
GrobiņaAuda
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
GrobiņaAuda
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.41
GrobiņaAuda
57%Clean sheet before half-time55%
GrobiņaAuda
70%No goal before half-time41%
GrobiņaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

0.74Points per match (2nd half)1.55
GrobiņaAuda
0.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
GrobiņaAuda
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
GrobiņaAuda
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.45
GrobiņaAuda
39%Clean sheet after half-time55%
GrobiņaAuda
74%No goal after half-time36%
GrobiņaAuda

Grobiņa - second-half results

9% W48% R43% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
11
31-45
2
9
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

GrobiņaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 2.172.98 2.86
Both teams scored 35%56% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 22%55% 55%
Clean sheets 22%24% 32%
Goal before half-time 61%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 70%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Grobiņa 0 - 2 - 4 Auda. Average goals 2.83, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Grobiņa
0 : 0
Auda
Auda
7 : 0
Grobiņa
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
2 : 2
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 2
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Grobiņa vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 0:2 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and Auda?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 0, Auda won 4 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs Auda?

Grobiņa score 0.65 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Grobiņa's matches and 59% of Auda's.

What form are Grobiņa and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs Auda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.