Guaireña vs Fernando de la Mora: match statistics
Guaireña vs Fernando de la Mora: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Guaireña played Fernando de la Mora in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 28 September 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Guaireña: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Fernando de la Mora: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Guaireña scores 0.88 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Fernando de la Mora scores 1.12 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Guaireña 48%, Fernando de la Mora 60%. Over 2.5: Guaireña 44%, Fernando de la Mora 48%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.40. Guaireña: 11.2 shots per match, Fernando de la Mora: 11.9.
Match halves
Guaireña: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.52. Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Guaireña: 76-90+ (6 goals). Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fernando de la Mora head into this match in noticeably better form: they have collected 8 points from their last 5 matches, winning twice and losing just once, while Guaireña have recorded 4 defeats and 1 draw. The hosts have scored just 3 goals during this period and conceded an average of 2 goals per match, highlighting their problems both in chance creation and defensive organisation. At home, Guaireña average only 0.75 goals, fail to score in 58% of matches, and have a shot conversion rate of 7%, compared with Fernando de la Mora’s 1.17 goals and 11% conversion rate away from home. The chance-quality metrics are similar, but marginally favour the visitors in attack (xG 1.42 vs. 1.39), while their last 5 matches have produced just 5 goals conceded. The visitors’ away record is not dominant, so a draw remains a realistic outcome, but current form and Guaireña’s attacking deficiencies point to Fernando de la Mora having the better chances.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Although the season-long BTTS rates stand at 62% for Guaireña and 58% for Fernando de la Mora, the hosts’ current attacking efficiency clearly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Guaireña have scored just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game, and failed to score in 23% of their matches this season. Fernando de la Mora have kept a clean sheet in 25% of their games and conceded an average of only 1.0 goal over their last five fixtures, increasing the risk that the hosts’ weak attack will be held scoreless. The visitors should create chances against a Guaireña defence that has conceded 10 goals in its last 5 matches, but they themselves have failed to score in 33% of their games this season. The hosts’ high xG of 1.39 over their last five matches supports the case for a goal, but their actual output of 0.6 goals per game slightly favours the BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: Guaireña’s average xG is 1.65, while Fernando de la Mora’s stands at 1.42, providing a basis to expect around 2.55 goals. At the same time, the hosts have scored just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game, despite conceding as many as 10, so their weaker attacking form limits the risk of a very high-scoring outcome. Under 3.5 goals has landed in 77% of Guaireña’s matches and 67% of Fernando de la Mora’s, while the 3.5 line was exceeded in only 23% and 33% of cases, respectively. The visitors have been more effective in their current run, averaging 1.2 goals per game across their last five appearances, but neither team consistently records matches with more than 3 goals scored. The strongest selection is Under 3.5, as the season data and current goal production support a scoreline in the 1-3 goals range.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Fernando de la Mora victory at full-time, as Guaireña were level at the break in 54% of their matches, compared with as many as 67% for the visitors. Both teams tend to produce highly cautious first halves: the hosts average 0.38 goals before the break and the visitors 0.42, while the average total number of first-half goals is just 0.85 and 0.83, respectively. After the interval, the form advantage clearly shifts towards the visitors: Fernando de la Mora collected 1.6 points per match in their last five outings, whereas Guaireña managed only 0.2 and lost 80% of those games. During this period, the hosts scored just 0.6 goals per match and conceded 2.0, while the visitors recorded 1.2 goals scored and only 1.0 conceded. Furthermore, Guaireña did not lead at half-time in any of their last five matches, while Fernando de la Mora remained unbeaten at the break, further strengthening the forecast of a cautious start and an advantage for the visitors in the final outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Guaireña | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fernando de la Mora is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Guaireña · 1.6 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fernando de la Mora is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Guaireña · 1.12 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Guaireña is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Guaireña · 1.4 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Guaireña scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).
Fernando de la Mora scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while Guaireña keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Guaireña
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Guaireña - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Guaireña
Fernando de la Mora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Guaireña | Liga | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.59 | • 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 57% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 66% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Guaireña 3 - 0 - 0 Fernando de la Mora. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Guaireña vs Fernando de la Mora?
The Division Intermedia match finished Guaireña 0:2 Fernando de la Mora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Guaireña and Fernando de la Mora?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Guaireña won 3, Fernando de la Mora won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Guaireña vs Fernando de la Mora?
Guaireña score 0.88 goals per game on average and Fernando de la Mora 1.12. The Division Intermedia average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Guaireña's matches and 60% of Fernando de la Mora's.
What form are Guaireña and Fernando de la Mora in?
Over the last 5 games Guaireña have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Fernando de la Mora 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guaireña vs Fernando de la Mora?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


