Guangxi Hengchen vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Guangxi Hengchen vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Guangxi Hengchen play Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match date is 26 July 2026 at 13:30.
Current form
Guangxi Hengchen: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Guangxi Hengchen scores 1.57 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Guangxi Hengchen 57%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%. Over 2.5: Guangxi Hengchen 57%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Guangxi Hengchen has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.34. Guangxi Hengchen: 14.2 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.9.
Match halves
Guangxi Hengchen: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.07. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Guangxi Hengchen: 31-45+ (5 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Guangxi Hengchen | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangxi Hengchen is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Guangxi Hengchen · 0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangxi Hengchen is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Guangxi Hengchen · 1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangxi Hengchen is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Guangxi Hengchen · 1.67 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Guangxi Hengchen scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Guangxi Hengchen keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Guangxi Hengchen
Over / Under — Heilongjiang Lava Spring
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangxi Hengchen is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Guangxi Hengchen · 1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Guangxi Hengchen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Guangxi Hengchen
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Guangxi Hengchen | Liga | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.50 | 2.56 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Guangxi Hengchen 0 - 0 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Guangxi Hengchen and Heilongjiang Lava Spring play?
Guangxi Hengchen face Heilongjiang Lava Spring on 26 July 2026 in China League One. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Guangxi Hengchen vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Guangxi Hengchen score 1.57 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.40. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Guangxi Hengchen's matches and 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.
What form are Guangxi Hengchen and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?
Over the last 5 games Guangxi Hengchen have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Guangxi Hengchen vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Guangxi Hengchen vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.